1. Schedule:
The Military has told media stations to anticipate a public declaration of Martial Law by Sun. 24 Jan.
Military troops were well aware of to whom they should be loyal in the dual government forces over them: "I am a National Guard soldier from the...
More from 🇺🇸I Support Our Military & Law Enforcement🇺🇸
1. Nashville Tenn. Missile Strike Explosion: NSA/AT&T Spy Hub Targeted.
Rumor: Once “Comrade [B]iden” is put into power ANTIFA will be given $120-million in funds to establish safety command and control systems in suburbs across the US in all 50 States.
2. SORCHA: "“Deadly Force” Zone Activated In Wake Of Strike On Nashville Voting Machine NSA Spy Hub" https://t.co/aQCqMy9mKf
24 Hour Period is Over - Nashville Dis-Info Clown Show From Here On
3. Christmas Day 25 Dec. Nashville Tenn. Missile Strike Explosion:
An assessment of the Nashville explosion made by the SVR based on the revelations made by former CIA-NSA computer expert Edward Snowden, who, in 2013, revealed the NSA hidden spy hubs located in American...
4. ... cities—revelations that, in 2015, were analyzed by the New York Times in their article “AT&T Helped U.S. Spy On Internet On A Vast Scale”, that stated: “The National Security Agency’s ability to spy on vast quantities of Internet traffic passing through the United States..
5. ... has relied on its extraordinary, decades-long partnership with a single company: the telecom giant AT&T.”
This was a secret relationship between the NSA and AT&T to begin a massive spying operation against the American people in 1985, known as Fairview Surveillance...
Rumor: Once “Comrade [B]iden” is put into power ANTIFA will be given $120-million in funds to establish safety command and control systems in suburbs across the US in all 50 States.
2. SORCHA: "“Deadly Force” Zone Activated In Wake Of Strike On Nashville Voting Machine NSA Spy Hub" https://t.co/aQCqMy9mKf
24 Hour Period is Over - Nashville Dis-Info Clown Show From Here On
3. Christmas Day 25 Dec. Nashville Tenn. Missile Strike Explosion:
An assessment of the Nashville explosion made by the SVR based on the revelations made by former CIA-NSA computer expert Edward Snowden, who, in 2013, revealed the NSA hidden spy hubs located in American...
4. ... cities—revelations that, in 2015, were analyzed by the New York Times in their article “AT&T Helped U.S. Spy On Internet On A Vast Scale”, that stated: “The National Security Agency’s ability to spy on vast quantities of Internet traffic passing through the United States..
5. ... has relied on its extraordinary, decades-long partnership with a single company: the telecom giant AT&T.”
This was a secret relationship between the NSA and AT&T to begin a massive spying operation against the American people in 1985, known as Fairview Surveillance...
More from Government
If you're curious what Trump's defense will look like, all you have to do is turn on Fox News. My latest at @mmfa
The tl;dr is that for years right-wing media have been excusing Trump's violent rhetoric by going, "Yes, but THE DEMOCRATS..." and then bending themselves into knots to pretend that Dems were calling for violence when they very, very clearly weren't.
And in fact, this predates Trump.
In 2008, Obama was talking about not backing down in the face of an ugly campaign. He said "If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun."
https://t.co/i5YaQJsKop
That quote was from the movie The Untouchables. And there's no way anybody reading that quote in good faith could conclude that he was talking about actual guns and knives. But it became a big talking point on the
In 2018, Obama-era Attorney General Eric Holder was speaking to a group of Georgia Democrats about GOP voter suppression. He riffed on Michelle Obama's "When they go low, we go high" line from the 2016 DNC.
The tl;dr is that for years right-wing media have been excusing Trump's violent rhetoric by going, "Yes, but THE DEMOCRATS..." and then bending themselves into knots to pretend that Dems were calling for violence when they very, very clearly weren't.
And in fact, this predates Trump.
In 2008, Obama was talking about not backing down in the face of an ugly campaign. He said "If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun."
https://t.co/i5YaQJsKop
That quote was from the movie The Untouchables. And there's no way anybody reading that quote in good faith could conclude that he was talking about actual guns and knives. But it became a big talking point on the
In 2018, Obama-era Attorney General Eric Holder was speaking to a group of Georgia Democrats about GOP voter suppression. He riffed on Michelle Obama's "When they go low, we go high" line from the 2016 DNC.
Which metric is a better predictor of the severity of the fall surge in US states?
1) Margin of Democrat victory in Nov 2020 election
or
2) % infected through Sep 1, 2020
Can you guess which plot is which?
The left plot is based on the % infected through Sep 1, 2020. You can see that there is very little correlation with the % infected since Sep 1.
However, there is a *strong* correlation when using the margin of Biden's victory (right).
Infections % from https://t.co/WcXlfxv3Ah.
This is the strongest single variable I've seen in being able to explain the severity of this most recent wave in each state.
Not past infections / existing immunity, population density, racial makeup, latitude / weather / humidity, etc.
But political lean.
One can argue that states that lean Democrat are more likely to implement restrictions/mandates.
This is valid, so we test this by using the Government Stringency Index made by @UniofOxford.
We also see a correlation, but it's weaker (R^2=0.36 vs 0.50).
https://t.co/BxBBKwW6ta
To avoid look-ahead bias/confounding variables, here is the same analysis but using 2016 margin of victory as the predictor. Similar results.
This basically says that 2016 election results is a better predictor of the severity of the fall wave than intervention levels in 2020!
1) Margin of Democrat victory in Nov 2020 election
or
2) % infected through Sep 1, 2020
Can you guess which plot is which?
The left plot is based on the % infected through Sep 1, 2020. You can see that there is very little correlation with the % infected since Sep 1.
However, there is a *strong* correlation when using the margin of Biden's victory (right).
Infections % from https://t.co/WcXlfxv3Ah.
This is the strongest single variable I've seen in being able to explain the severity of this most recent wave in each state.
Not past infections / existing immunity, population density, racial makeup, latitude / weather / humidity, etc.
But political lean.
One can argue that states that lean Democrat are more likely to implement restrictions/mandates.
This is valid, so we test this by using the Government Stringency Index made by @UniofOxford.
We also see a correlation, but it's weaker (R^2=0.36 vs 0.50).
https://t.co/BxBBKwW6ta
To avoid look-ahead bias/confounding variables, here is the same analysis but using 2016 margin of victory as the predictor. Similar results.
This basically says that 2016 election results is a better predictor of the severity of the fall wave than intervention levels in 2020!
You May Also Like
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
