Categories Trading

7 days 30 days All time Recent Popular
(1) Thread: I joined fund management early in my career. At that point, my first firm was small, I had many opportunities to learn & grow. It was not as structured so roles were flexible. Which is why I always encourage to start with small firm and learn as much as you can.


(2) People were wonderful, I was assigned a mentor who looked after my personally & professionally and gave me guidance from the occassional erratic & naive moves I made, purely down to inexperience. Were there people I disliked too? Yes

(3) I had a deep interest in how the business was run, although I was part of the investment team. My bosses & seniors were ever willing to answer my many questions. I, through my own initiative, started developing my own relationships, that I would then bring over to the firm

(4) Bosses appreciated this, and quickly I was involved in the business aspects of things. Being small firm then, allowed me to put my hand up for everything. I sat in on operations meeting that I had nothing to do with because I was curious about how the chain worked

(5) I got picked to run a newly formed entity in my late twenties. I was confident, and elated. However tinge of fear creeped in. I confided in my bosses, who told me ā€œwe will give you support, just dont screw it up sonā€ šŸ˜€
1/ Having built online trading platforms, I can share insights what is happening with #RobinhoodApp, why their businessmodel is shady and how this $GME šŸš€šŸš€šŸš€squeeze makes this all a pretty messy affair.

So, a thread šŸ‘‡šŸ»

2/ Firstly, the well hidden truth of online trading platforms is that most of the active traders lose money. And most does not mean 51%, but this is more like 90-95%. Clients burn out quite quickly as well.

3/ Some research:
a) from Brazil: "97% of traders lose money"
https://t.co/DVEfRkyvuS
b) from Taiwan: "Less than 1% of daytraders consistently earn positive returns"

4/ If we take a 100 year stock market chart, one can clearly see that longterm investing makes a lot of sense, whereas active trading most often is not a very rational thing to do. People do it because they think they can be better than the average.


5/ Every online broker should say to their clients "just do long term buy and hold, please-pretty-please do not do any trading stuff." But have you seen messages like that? Me neither.

The reason is that one active trader can bring fees like 500 passive investors.
THREAD: Robinhood and other brokerages came under fire last week for restricting trading in certain securities, including $GME and $AMC.

A thread simplifying the underlying mechanics of this drama and explaining why our archaic T+2 settlement system is to blame...


1/ First, if you're unfamiliar with the backdrop to this story, here are the basics.

GameStop (and other "meme stocks") saw a massive price spike last week.

There were fundamental and technical reasons for the rise.

My thread below is a helpful primer.


2/ On Thursday, several brokerages, including the popular @RobinhoodApp, halted or restricted trading in many of these stocks.

The public outcry was immediate (and very loud).

Amazingly, it even had @AOC and @TedCruz agreeing on something.


3/ There was speculation suggesting that Robinhood was involved in something nefarious.

Many pointed to their relationship with Citadel - a buyer of Robinhood order flow and a part-owner of infamous $GME short Melvin Capital - as a potential driver of the trading halts.


4/ But while this story made for headline-grabbing news, the real driver of the trading halts was much more mundane.

It has to do with our financial system's archaic "T+2 settlement" infrastructure.

It can get a bit complex, so let's simplify it here for everyone to understand.