Categories Trading

7 days 30 days All time Recent Popular
In which Chamath quite literally says Robinhood “should go to fucking jail” for obeying legal collateral requirement


Like he actually connects the two and mentions collateral requirements and says RH should go to jail

This is maybe the worst discussion I’ve heard of GME from people who clearly know better. They’re encouraging people to “watch billions” to understand how hedge funds work.

Oh just got to the point where they call for a short term transaction tax to REPLACE the capital gains tax.

Chamath calls lowering the cap gains tax “genius”

Oh now Chamath believes the class actions will work because of the “implied losses,” because users clearly lost tens of billions theoretical gains!

The solution is to move accounts to other brokers (like sofi)
1/ Having built online trading platforms, I can share insights what is happening with #RobinhoodApp, why their businessmodel is shady and how this $GME 🚀🚀🚀squeeze makes this all a pretty messy affair.

So, a thread 👇🏻

2/ Firstly, the well hidden truth of online trading platforms is that most of the active traders lose money. And most does not mean 51%, but this is more like 90-95%. Clients burn out quite quickly as well.

3/ Some research:
a) from Brazil: "97% of traders lose money"
https://t.co/DVEfRkyvuS
b) from Taiwan: "Less than 1% of daytraders consistently earn positive returns"

4/ If we take a 100 year stock market chart, one can clearly see that longterm investing makes a lot of sense, whereas active trading most often is not a very rational thing to do. People do it because they think they can be better than the average.


5/ Every online broker should say to their clients "just do long term buy and hold, please-pretty-please do not do any trading stuff." But have you seen messages like that? Me neither.

The reason is that one active trader can bring fees like 500 passive investors.
Draft legislation to implement the UK-EU deal now published

A few quick thoughts (although very much first

It seems like the bill contains a mix of some of the options outlined in our @instituteforgov explainer on UK ratification

https://t.co/WUa3MSkABL


Clause 29 seems to be a catch all clause - so existing domestic law is treated as subject to the UK-EU deal where it has not been specifically amended to implement it (where this is required) (more from @ProfMarkElliott
https://t.co/FEBrdG09Cy)


Also seem to be separate provisions for the social security coordination protocol to form part of domestic law (clause 26)


Clause 31 includes a general implementating power (a big Henry VIII power, that allows the use of secondary legislation to do anything an act of parliament could do). Seems to be affirmative. Exercisable by gov and also devolved administrations. Inevitable given short time.