Feels like a good time to share my path from random person on the internet to @Coinbase to @1confirmation

Nothing special just curiosity and hustle which everyone has, it just needs to be unlocked

Coinbase is now a giant that's easy to hate on but started as an underdog just like every other startup. @brian_armstrong launched it by himself in June 2012

I got curious after reading his Hacker News post (https://t.co/t69Tz5E2Eb) and became one of the first users
Months earlier a @fredwilson post (https://t.co/wmu3WRuYCy) about BTC intrigued me and I made my first purchase by taking out cash from an ATM then going to a CVS to Moneygram it to Mt. Gox

Buying on https://t.co/lvwtxPqm8B was a huge improvement from that initial experience
Bitcoin wasn’t in high demand then so Brian sent "bitcents" to users 😂

Down the rabbit hole I went
July 2013: Cold emails ftw (this was one of many)
Fall 2013: Reached out to merchants w/ my .edu email & relentlessly pitched them on adding BTC as a payment method

Before working for the company I proved I could contribute by convincing many to use Coinbase merchant tools (@fiverr @fancy @treehouse @SJEarthquakes, etc)
Early 2014: Missed lots of class while also serving as Coinbase's east coast presence, left @YaleSOM for SF
2014 - 2016: Many ups & downs

A phishing attack wiped out my entire BTC holdings (before 2FA on withdrawals) 🤬

Startups are volatile, crypto startups are extra volatile 😬

Helped Coinbase emerge as trusted brand 🚀

Launched new products that helped BTC adoption🌎
There was some momentum on bitcoin dev and merchant adoption then, but not a lot

The core buy/sell product was what moved the needle (still is)
I wrote a lot publicly on the Coinbase blog and my own blog

People like @pmarca shared my work which helped a lot for "credibility" but more importantly for confidence e.g. https://t.co/dY5PlyIjFo
We were mostly BTC maximalists early on

This was an obvious misstep - we focused too much on the yellow paper and what distributed systems PhDs were saying and not enough on the talent of the creators (@VitalikButerin and @gavofyork). We quickly adjusted though
.@zxocw was the first I recall taking Ethereum seriously. I got conviction and wrote up a company memo on it after judging a @coindesk hackathon in '15 where every dev was using it - wish i still had that memo https://t.co/dsFHRYoYid cc/ @pete_rizzo_
This @FEhrsam post was big for the culture "Ethereum is the Forefront of Digital Currency" https://t.co/HhlklejWC6
2017: Ethereum ecosystem emerged, innovation accelerated. I started @1confirmation

First investors: @Andrebliznyuk @jgut @mcuban @pmarca @cdixon @peterthiel
May 2017: Digital Currency's "Netscape Moment" at the Inaugural Token Summit w/ @wmougayar: https://t.co/wwjOXGuk73
2018 - Present: Ethereum ecosystem thrives, innovation accelerates, institutions want more crypto exposure

The Coinbase public listing will be a nice milestone for the industry when it happens but it's just the first inning
So far crypto has enriched an exclusive few, but It’s lasting impact will be empowering the billions who’ve been excluded & exploited by institutions who are happy to maintain status quo

This is not a platitude, it’s already started & will happen on massive scale this decade
Takeaway(s):

Ignore uninformed opinions from extroverts around you

It’s easy to have a short-term view that sounds good to other people, much harder and more rewarding to have quiet conviction long-term and be right
Most people overvalue institutional constructs IRL & undervalue new ideas online

You don’t have to have special talent or be in Silicon Valley to benefit from new ideas online, you can be anyone with curiosity & hustle anywhere
Cold emails and DMs are your friend
You need timing & team. We had both @craighammel @SatoshiLite @whiteadaml @barrykwok @aharshner @nathaliemcgrath @mihar @dwr @maksim_s @shodyesq @defunctzombie @rwitoff @jorilallo @karrisaarinen @ljxie @antoniomjuliano @bramanathan @keighstone @sjrosenblum many not active on twtr

More from Tech

A brief analysis and comparison of the CSS for Twitter's PWA vs Twitter's legacy desktop website. The difference is dramatic and I'll touch on some reasons why.

Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.

6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices

https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x


PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.

735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices

https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ


The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.

The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.

You May Also Like

"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."


We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.

Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)

It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.

Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".