
T-1 Psychology behind the formation of a candle - personally I feel that if one is aware of psychology behind the formation of candle than chart starts talking to you. So, here I am starting my journey of 🧵 with how actually candles form. Small but important for beginners 👇







More from Stockslearnings
Ex- #sastasundar after breakout 145/155 zone , stocks in 2/3 weeks given 30/40% return.
And in 2/3 months it was double 💞 https://t.co/9kkc3IV4Lo

I am going to make #priceaction breakout thread with real examples
— V\xb6k\u03c0nT (@Trading0secrets) June 24, 2021
By which u can easily find out blasting stocks.
it is only based on my experience of last 5 years
How many learners are excited \U0001f973
Show your love \u2764 by likes & retweets so that most new one can take advantage.
🌟Lesson 2 - if stock is making same pattern ( in 2 /3hours chart) after given breakout of (weekly /monthly chart) , then chances of stock going up is much more.
Ex - #HGS after given breakout of Trendline ( range) in monthly chart, again making same pattern 4 hours chart. 💞

🌟Lesson 3- if stock never come to retest it's weekly & monthly breakout zone then the chances of it's 2x is much more.
EX - #happiestmind everytime consolidating & making new high. 💞
@chartmojo
@charts_breakout

🌟Lesson 4 - when whole market fall still strongest stocks only consolidate or move down very little.
Ex - when this march market took correction 800/1000 points #jindalpoly just consolidating from that time.
Now ready for new high . 💞

🌟Lesson 5 - when market recover the strongest stocks recover very fast & will make new high.
Ex - #happiestmind when market take little correction & again bounce little , then #happiestmind made new high before market .

Thread's on:
• How to find targets and exit criteria?
• Shanon's Demon (Investing)
• Tradingview scanner- Intraday/BTST
• 90-degree angle inflection point for profit-booking
• Importance of Leverage
Other cool tweets as well.
🧵Shannon's Demon - an investing "thought exercise"
This account writes the best threads, if you like the threads I make, you will surely love this account. Must
1/
— 10-K Diver (@10kdiver) October 23, 2021
Get a cup of coffee.
In this thread, I'll walk you through Shannon's Demon.
This is an investing "thought exercise" -- posed by the great scientist Claude Shannon.
Solving this exercise can teach us a lot about favorable vs unfavorable long-term bets, position sizing, etc.
🧵Finding expected targets and exit criteria to look for to exit the
How to find out the expected targets and what should be the exit criteria when you enter a trade - \U0001f9f5
— Sheetal Rijhwani (@RijhwaniSheetal) October 25, 2021
Possible ways to find out the target:
Check if any patterns forming - it gets quite easy to figure out the targets that way. (1/15)
🧵Trading View Scanner process to trade in momentum stocks.
Trading view scanner process -
— Vikrant (@Trading0secrets) October 23, 2021
1 - open trading view in your browser and select stock scanner in left corner down side .
2 - touch the percentage% gain change ( and u can see higest gainer of today) https://t.co/GGWSZXYMth
🧵90-degree angle inflection point for
The 90 degree angle inflection point in a stock is a signal to book profit
— Nikita Poojary (@niki_poojary) October 24, 2021
Lets understand with a recent example of a stock #IRCTC \U0001f683\U0001f68b
Time for a thread\U0001f9f5
You May Also Like
Flat Earth conference attendees explain how they have been brainwashed by YouTube and Infowarshttps://t.co/gqZwGXPOoc
— Raw Story (@RawStory) November 18, 2018
This spring at SxSW, @SusanWojcicki promised "Wikipedia snippets" on debated videos. But they didn't put them on flat earth videos, and instead @YouTube is promoting merchandising such as "NASA lies - Never Trust a Snake". 2/

A few example of flat earth videos that were promoted by YouTube #today:
https://t.co/TumQiX2tlj 3/
https://t.co/uAORIJ5BYX 4/
https://t.co/yOGZ0pLfHG 5/
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.

Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)

There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.

At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?