#Breaking #BreakingNews
Countries around the world are speaking out about the #Deepstate of the #DNC CRIMINALS & The Military-Industrial Complex & other Corrupt Corporate & Business & Intel Agency Interests in #America which have subverted the nation, laws, ppl & the world.

💥🏮🌌☄️🪐
MASSIVE Geomagnetic Storm inbound G3 class was predicted to have Aurora further south than anything in last 14 yrs. This could be able to hear it's interference in headphones & likely will cause outages across some satellites & some communications. However it was a dud

#Breaking #BreakingNews
💥🚨🇦🇺🇬🇧🇨🇰🇺🇸💥🚨
"#Elections RIGGING instead of conventional warfare is the NEW Western Foreign Policy Method"
-The #USA & #NWO comprised of the #Deepstate #UN #EU & #UK Privy Council have shifted to RIGGING World Elections for Total Slavery vs Guns&Bombs

FACTS about "The Idea of #QAnon"
1. #Q or Qanon or "Anons" is "Just an Idea" Unlike Antifa or BLM
2. There is No organization nor any official organization of Q or Qanon & those who "are part of it" don't even know if there is a leader or who "the leader is" Unlike Antifa or BLM

The #FOREIGN Run, Owned, Controlled, Hacked, Stored, Subverted, Stolen, Insurrected, Manipulated, International, Multinational, CCP China International Funding Facilitated #Elections infrastructure& #Election of #America. Brought to U by Terror States, Communists&Insurrectionists

#Breaking #BreakingNews
💥
#Dominion CRIME Machines CEO LIES Under Oath to Officials that the company didn't get 400 Million Dollars From UBS Securities LLC when the actual document for the SALE OF EQUITY is on the SEC website. Maybe the SEC is lying? Reporters should call them.

Oh are we talking about Sheryl Sandberg again? Well, your reminder that disabled feminists, LGBQT feminists, and feminists of color criticised her ‘lean in’ deal from day one. Don’t let anyone retcon that out of existence.

Like, a pretty narrow slice of feminists actually endorse and support corporate feminism, they’re just white, nondisabled, straight, cis, and noisy so their voices have a bigger reach.

So if your impression is that ‘feminism’ gave her a ‘free pass’ maybe you should question your overall impression of feminism rather than continuing to centre a handful of people as ‘thought leaders’ or whatever.

Critics within feminism have been doing this work for a long time and have been getting shat on it for about as long and I'm tired of seeing them erased. But what do I know — I am, after all, not a feminist.

But I WILL say, from my not-a-feminist perspective, that people who aren’t feminists who are criticising feminism should maybe understand the movement more deeply beyond a handful of high profile celebrity feminists.

I have just received information about a family that has locked up their child at home in isolation because she complained of some aches in her body. They suspected the child as having C19. She was tested and after a couple of days, the test came out negative. 1/n

The girl has already been in isolation for 4 days. Now they are waiting to do another PCR test today to check again because they fear that the first test was done too early and it didn't detect covid. So this little girl will remain in isolation for at least another 24 hrs. 2/n

This is idiocy. Insanity. Ignorance. Cruelty. Simply a crime against children.
The stupid fear and the stupid policies are driving parents to abuse their children. 3/n

Children are not the main source of C19 transmission.

"transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from children under 14 years of age was minimal in primary schools"

Overall I think Labour will be a bit disappointed with how the ‘relaunch’ has started. Labour have given themselves a mountain to climb anyway through a year of inaction but the speech today lacked coherence, purpose and distinction from the government.

Starmer is (funnily enough) making a lot of the same mistakes Corbyn made in 2019. He is listing a ‘bold’ set of policy proposals that come across as disjointed and lacking connection to Britain’s priorities.

The policies themselves were basically good, I wouldn’t argue against them. But I would cringe whenever Labour came out with spending proposal after spending proposal in 2019 without any rationale or connection to a larger economic strategy. That’s what Starmer did today.

The questions that voters will have about Starmer’s speech are the same ones that voters will have had about Corbyn’s 2019 manifesto: why are these policies your priority, how can we afford them and why aren’t we doing these already?

The first one needs to be answered by diagnosing Britain’s problems and their causes. He doesn’t have to diagnose all of them. For the purpose of today he could have picked three that feed off each other: inequality, stagnant income growth and stagnant productivity.

One wonders how long Lord Frost will retain his new position. The personnel decisions made by the PM are nothing if not frequent, ruthless and mercurial.

The whole affair is very curious. While I am sure that Lord Frost’s elevation owes much to his relationship with the PM and the perceived success of the Brexit negotiation, it is very curious indeed that allegedly it took a threat to resign to secure this new role.

A role which is needed (although might have been structured differently) but was to a large effect previously undertaken (with reasonable success) by Michael Gove who one might imagine may not be entirely happy with this diminishment of his responsibilities.

What might have happened to have resulted in this dramatic and to some extent destructive move (which appears to have been played out in the context of a wider struggle that saw Oliver Lewis (previously Lord Frost’s (LF) negotiation deputy)?

The original sin, of course, is the agreement to the Northern Ireland Protocol. Who knows who did what to who or thought what about what but my speculation is the PM either did not understand the consequences of the Protocol or was assured they could be successfully addressed.