I have a passion to help &  educate other trans athletes about their own bodies. I suffer many adverse health conditions from not understanding my own post surgery endocrine system early enough before it had damaged my health.
1-

This article shows the consequences to health when trans girls experience low T. This is important to educate everyone because in this conversation those against us compare men's performance versus women.
2-
https://t.co/EOH5dSHrxI
This article also shows trans girls have very different endocrine systems to a healthy male and as such they should not be compared to men when talking about sports performance.
3-
https://t.co/EOH5dSHrxI
The only comparison you can make between a trans female athlete and a male would be to compare the trans girl to a male that has either been surgically or chemically sterilized.
4-
You won't even find men competing in elite sports in this health state without being prescribed T replacement therapy which is not available to a trans woman like me in sports.
5-
Finally there is a paucity of research on trans athletes out there but there is an abundance of research and knowledge on the endocrine systems much has been known for decades.
6-
Sports need to be looking at how testosterone affects athletes health first way before they look at performance. Sadly they are not doing that & that is why my health has suffered and this is why Kristen Worleys also health suffered and many more.
7-7
https://t.co/EOH5dSHrxI
Athletes caught up in the IAAF/IOC policy on hyperandrogenism were required in order to partake in sport to undergo surgical and/or hormonal interventions unrelated to their health status.
These procedures have been called into question as invasively counterproductive to the wellbeing of those women.
https://t.co/2PaxipfIte
Many incorrectly presumed that, by comparison, transgendered female athletes have no similar health concerns. Their overarching requirement is to keep serum testosterone levels below 5 or 10 nmol/L, and they must submit to hormone tests as evidence of that.
A ten-year struggle by cyclist Worley showed this is not be a simple journey. The intricacies of her story have been deftly summarised by Pierre-Jean Vazel.
https://t.co/GXplQ4lKUz
In essence, Worley underwent gender reassignment via surgery in 2001 and attempted to re-enter the world of sport.
But when she applied for a (TUE) for testosterone (which is a vital hormone for women, as well as men), approval took ten months instead of days or weeks. (Exactly what I am experiencing now myself or has taken months whilst I become unwell.)
https://t.co/GXplQ4lKUz
This put Worley into a “severe post-menopausal state”. It not only impacted on her health, but it prevented her from training as an elite cyclist.
Ultimately, when Worley was permitted a TUE under the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) code, the allowable: levels of synthetic testosterone … were not enough to support her basic health.
We keep seeing Recycling failed policy.

Remarkably, Worley was able to have her case heard outside of CAS and, in a fillip for athlete self-determination, via a tribunal independent of sport.
Worley engaged Cycling Canada, the Ontario Cycling Association & the (UCI) in a formal mediation session at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario. Worley argued for reforms to: … the policies, guidelines, rules and processes surrounding XY female athletes, ....
gender verification and therapeutic use of required hormones that are captured by anti-doping regulations.
In a resounding victory for evidence-based policy, the UCI accepted Worley’s critique and announced it would now support an advocacy initiative to encourage sport’s....
governing bodies, at the highest level, to adopt policies and guidelines that are based in objective scientific research and responsive to the individualised needs of XY female athletes.
The mediation parties agreed to promote this message to the IOC and WADA – the overarching global organisations in the Worley case.

This is why the IOC will never ban us the science exists.....Kristen held global sports to account in the dock.
End:

https://t.co/hsLalSz3hd
@threadreaderapp please unroll

More from Kirsti Miller

”No child should ever be forced to live a life that is not theirs, I did and it nearly killed me many times.”


It appears that every time an under-age Transgender person attempts to access medical care to make their lives better conservative people try to say they’re not ready for it.


As an older transgender woman who waited until I my mid 30’s due to those same prevailing attitudes, I feel it’s sad right-wing people are still trotting out those same tired old lines.

According to them, we’re too young to know our gender pre-pubescent and when we start undergoing a puberty which doesn’t align with our gender identity apparently we’re still far too young to access puberty blockers to make the masculinisation process go away.

These people only want us to access medical care after the age of 18 and that’s when it’s far too late for many Trans women, as the whole masculinisation process [which we didn’t want in the first place] has already happened.

More from Society

global health policy in 2020 has centered around NPI's (non-pharmaceutical interventions) like distancing, masks, school closures

these have been sold as a way to stop infection as though this were science.

this was never true and that fact was known and knowable.

let's look.


above is the plot of social restriction and NPI vs total death per million. there is 0 R2. this means that the variables play no role in explaining one another.

we can see this same relationship between NPI and all cause deaths.

this is devastating to the case for NPI.


clearly, correlation is not proof of causality, but a total lack of correlation IS proof that there was no material causality.

barring massive and implausible coincidence, it's essentially impossible to cause something and not correlate to it, especially 51 times.

this would seem to pose some very serious questions for those claiming that lockdowns work, those basing policy upon them, and those claiming this is the side of science.

there is no science here nor any data. this is the febrile imaginings of discredited modelers.

this has been clear and obvious from all over the world since the beginning and had been proven so clearly by may that it's hard to imagine anyone who is actually conversant with the data still believing in these responses.

everyone got the same R

You May Also Like

I think a plausible explanation is that whatever Corbyn says or does, his critics will denounce - no matter how much hypocrisy it necessitates.


Corbyn opposes the exploitation of foreign sweatshop-workers - Labour MPs complain he's like Nigel

He speaks up in defence of migrants - Labour MPs whinge that he's not listening to the public's very real concerns about immigration:

He's wrong to prioritise Labour Party members over the public:

He's wrong to prioritise the public over Labour Party