#FreeTip Qrly EPS breakout stocks are more likely to move in excess of 5% multiple times after a technical price breakout. High double or triple digit Annual qoq EPS growth rate have even more chances. Best site to see this is @MarketSmithIND . Egs #Datamatics #Icil etc.
More from ScorpioManoj
#Freetip
Today's move is an example of this tweet. Save this chart for future ref. https://t.co/amUhSLrET3
Today's move is an example of this tweet. Save this chart for future ref. https://t.co/amUhSLrET3
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E4_H5zlX0AQfueh.png)
#FreeTip
— HMK alias MANOJ (@scorpiomanojFRM) June 23, 2021
A general rule to assess if a market is ranging is to look at developing TC and / or developing BC. If either of them is flat, it means market is currently ranging. If you are trading in 5 min, go to a lower tf chart, say, 2 min to have a less lagging assessment.
More from Screeners
You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".