Praj Industries - BIG Picture
155-175 Major support and also retest of breakout.
275-220 Probabable targets in medium term.
#PRAJIND https://t.co/dsbj25WPbQ
Thanks. Praj Industries perfect smart distribution. More weakness below 336. Rise to 355-365 can face selling pressure.
— Shivaji Vitthalrao\U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@shivaji_1983) August 10, 2021
Below 336 I see 275 in few months as long as its trading below 388 on closing basis CMP 351. https://t.co/iMRpbTfOpU pic.twitter.com/mKwgDwreaU
More from Shivaji Vitthalrao🇮🇳
India Cement setting up for multi year breakout above 226 can do 340-370-400-450-500 and more in next 2-4 years. @entrepreneur987 @moneyworks4u_fa @TradeWithSandy pic.twitter.com/MbCPMnN6d9
— Shivaji Vitthalrao\U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@shivaji_1983) May 20, 2021
1. Stock is consolidating in the band 100-120 on lower side & 1900-1950 on upper side.
2. CMP 1344 1st targets 1850-1950
3. Medium term targets 2400-2500
4. Long term taregts 3500 first and then 8,000-10,000 in next 4-5 yrs
5. This is going to be 15-16 years breakout https://t.co/BXMv5GjsGW
Spotted a stock which can become 5digits and 5x over 3-5 years
— Shivaji Vitthalrao\U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@shivaji_1983) September 2, 2021
Headquarters in Namma Bengaluru, Karnataka.
Keep Thinking will post over weekend\U0001f92a
6. Stock hits high 160-175 in 1995 & 1997
7. went into down trend, consolidated for 3 yrs 1999-2002
8. Gave breakout above 34 hinting at major shift in Feb 2002
9. Gave 1st multi year breakout in Oct 2003 above 160-175 which was failed
10. Next attempt in Sep 2004 crossed 175
11. Above 1995-1997 highs (160-175) stock went on to become 10x in a matter of 20-22 months
12. CMP 1344 Multi year breakout will trigger above 1950 on weekly closing basis
13. Will be watching 1st breakout above 1950
14. SL 1260/1100 depends on risk of the trader or investor
More from Praj
You May Also Like
To me, the most important aspect of the 2018 midterms wasn't even about partisan control, but about democracy and voting rights. That's the real battle.
2/The good news: It's now an issue that everyone's talking about, and that everyone cares about.
3/More good news: Florida's proposition to give felons voting rights won. But it didn't just win - it won with substantial support from Republican voters.
That suggests there is still SOME grassroots support for democracy that transcends
4/Yet more good news: Michigan made it easier to vote. Again, by plebiscite, showing broad support for voting rights as an
5/OK, now the bad news.
We seem to have accepted electoral dysfunction in Florida as a permanent thing. The 2000 election has never really
Bad ballot design led to a lot of undervotes for Bill Nelson in Broward Co., possibly even enough to cost him his Senate seat. They do appear to be real undervotes, though, instead of tabulation errors. He doesn't really seem to have a path to victory. https://t.co/utUhY2KTaR
— Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) November 16, 2018
@NBA @StephenKissler @yhgrad 1. From Day 1, SARS-COV-2 was very well adapted to humans .....and transgenic hACE2 Mice
1. From Day 1, SARS-COV-2 was very well adapted to humans .....and transgenic hACE2 Mice
— Billy Bostickson \U0001f3f4\U0001f441&\U0001f441 \U0001f193 (@BillyBostickson) January 30, 2021
"we generated a mouse model expressing hACE2 by using CRISPR/Cas9 knockin technology. In comparison with wild-type C57BL/6 mice, both young & aged hACE2 mice sustained high viral loads... pic.twitter.com/j94XtSkscj
@NBA @StephenKissler @yhgrad 2. High Probability of serial passaging in Transgenic Mice expressing hACE2 in genesis of SARS-COV-2
1. High Probability of serial passaging in Transgenic Mice expressing hACE2 in genesis of SARS-COV-2!
— Billy Bostickson \U0001f3f4\U0001f441&\U0001f441 \U0001f193 (@BillyBostickson) January 2, 2021
2 papers:
Human\u2013viral molecular mimicryhttps://t.co/irfH0Zgrve
Molecular Mimicryhttps://t.co/yLQoUtfS6s https://t.co/lsCv2iMEQz
@NBA @StephenKissler @yhgrad B.1.1.7 has an unusually large number of genetic changes, ... found to date in mouse-adapted SARS-CoV2 and is also seen in ferret infections.
https://t.co/9Z4oJmkcKj
@NBA @StephenKissler @yhgrad We adapted a clinical isolate of SARS-CoV-2 by serial passaging in the ... Thus, this mouse-adapted strain and associated challenge model should be ... (B) SARS-CoV-2 genomic RNA loads in mouse lung homogenates at P0 to P6.
https://t.co/I90OOCJg7o
Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?
A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:
Next level tactic when closing a sale, candidate, or investment:
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) February 27, 2018
Ask: \u201cWhat needs to be true for you to be all in?\u201d
You'll usually get an explicit answer that you might not get otherwise. It also holds them accountable once the thing they need becomes true.
2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to
- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal
3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:
Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.
Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.
4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?
To get clarity.
You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.
It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.
5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”
Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.
