#SBI #SBIN #PNF Counts open for 800-900
That move from 430 to 546 changed the chart.
I have 1500-2500-3000 targets for long term. Have explained in 2021 when stock was at 370-400 But lets take it step by step.
#SBIN chart pic.twitter.com/RQ491UvxeP
— Vithal (@srvithal388) August 13, 2022
More from Shivaji Vitthalrao🇮🇳
Copper break below 4.43 qualify as bearish Flag and pole
HINDCOPPER break below 157 qualify as bearish Flag n pole.
Impact copper can test 4.28-4.20
HINDCOPPER can test 150-141 as per pattern targets.
165-166 Lakshman Rekha.
Quiz - Hindcopper
— Shivaji Vitthalrao\U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@shivaji_1983) June 9, 2021
What pattern do you see?
whats the confirmation level and impact ?
Both are interlinked. https://t.co/0gVaRXd4pS pic.twitter.com/Bbs1rdaOWf
Today I see a very strong signal of this happening in 3-4 years. Trail sl as pernur risk.
#Indiacem
India Cement Could not cross 226 in the last attempt to trigger multi year breakout.
— Shivaji Vitthalrao\U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@shivaji_1983) September 2, 2021
Stock in this leg crossing 212 can trigger this 14 years breakout. CMP 180 taking a SL 150
Revised Target 4 digits by 2024-2025. I am not kidding \U0001f600#Indiacement https://t.co/xhWjqrJm4j pic.twitter.com/42Q8qO7tO7
Till it breakouts expect pendulum swings within this structure.
I am positive for 19300-20000 above 18350.
Bottoms 16800-17000 in place and 200dema at 16600. Dont see any big cut. @moneyworks4u_fa https://t.co/lceGFlDyRM
#Nifty taking a shape of triangle rather than CNH.
— Shivaji Vitthalrao\U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@shivaji_1983) January 29, 2022
Confirmation point is same 18350 and targets also same as below \U0001f447
Traingle /CNH whats in a name as long as targets and Confirmation point is same. https://t.co/vfM1odTd94
More from Sbin
#FnOstock #SBIN has completed a 9 month time correction towards the primary trend line & is all set to head higher from here.
— Trendline Investor (@dmdsplyinvestor) July 11, 2022
This could also be a #SIP stock considering it broke out from a decade long consolidation in Feb'21.
Might continue to outperform #Nifty & #Banknifty pic.twitter.com/mYk4exvOn7
You May Also Like
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?