https://t.co/hrCU2xVi3U
2016
https://t.co/ZpyQ4WeUWZ
2016
https://t.co/ua10Y0fu0Z
2015 mice influenca
https://t.co/vaJVnItF3B
Novavax
Matrix M coating for cancer therapeutics
Following in the orchestrated wave if 'Emerging infectious diseases'.
A good cloak to hide a nasty machinery beneath.
2022
https://t.co/gm76Pzw0KT
further articles in following tweet
https://t.co/hrCU2xVi3U
2016
https://t.co/ZpyQ4WeUWZ
2016
https://t.co/ua10Y0fu0Z
2015 mice influenca
https://t.co/vaJVnItF3B
More from rubic3n
@Keane1975 Die Forschung mit Virenmanipulation und mRNA Impfstoffen geht dem schon seitlich weit voraus.
Nachfolgend
- zum Bau des Labors in Wuhan durch BioMerieux -> Bancel jetzt Moderna
- Werbebroschüre BioMerieux (CEPI GAVI Einbindung)
- Moderna ominöser geheimer weiterer Impfstoff
1
Bau des Labors in Wuhan BioMerieux Beteiligung
2004
Bancel BioMerieux
Mehr zum Bau des Labors durch BioMerieus in Wuhan (Stephane Bancel ex BioMerieux jetzt
Bancel BioMerieux Wuhan
Nachfolgend
- zum Bau des Labors in Wuhan durch BioMerieux -> Bancel jetzt Moderna
- Werbebroschüre BioMerieux (CEPI GAVI Einbindung)
- Moderna ominöser geheimer weiterer Impfstoff
1
Bau des Labors in Wuhan BioMerieux Beteiligung
2004
CCP
— rubic3n (@rubic3n) February 19, 2021
US
France
all in.
Gates Biontech, Biomerieux Moderna, Gilead Trump
All in.
Who is more?@franciscodeasis https://t.co/ADowRaYHsL
Bancel BioMerieux
However, through the Bancel (WEF), James Le Duc, Biomerieux gateway France still stayed pretty well in the game - however, sophisticatedly covered. Quite a camouflage masterpiece.
— rubic3n (@rubic3n) August 29, 2021
This is where 100Mio EU funding went?https://t.co/hFvdBS62rYhttps://t.co/jkJgyBdiYk pic.twitter.com/rulfKhKIWw
Mehr zum Bau des Labors durch BioMerieus in Wuhan (Stephane Bancel ex BioMerieux jetzt
biomerieux has the lab in lyon and they also made the lab in wuhan. https://t.co/dmgTLZ1kEK
— Bianca, fight the abolition of human rights (@Bianca50406170) November 16, 2021
Bancel BioMerieux Wuhan
I\u2019m wondering if/when this will catch on... https://t.co/PoBxz4JyiW pic.twitter.com/1rZFot4uxr
— Jesse \u201cEpstein+WEF+\U0001f1fa\U0001f1f3=Malthusianism\U0001f489\u201d Matchey (@JesseMatchey) January 9, 2022
80% of diseases not treatable with 'conventional medicine'. Protein treatment as an alternative with drawbacks.
An 80% market for mRNA. Yet, the vector is the bottleneck causing the limitation.
Viral V is almost a 'use once only' bcs of antibody formation.
LNP sole way to push.
mRNA Therapy - with a gargantuan market - in dire need for a vector.
Viral vectors as a dead ally until 2015.
mRNA Therapy meets enormous resentments.
Luckily, billions of people have now got first hand experience. Obviously, AZ was not that useful in the general drift.
LNP instead of a vector
PFIZER BioNtech
ALC-0315
ALC-0159, DSPC
"This product is for research use only and not for human use."
https://t.co/tNsG5wxVCT
'EMA Zulassung ohne
Official statement by Echelon
Paraphrased - "we do produce it, but only for use in labs.
Pfizer get theirs from other companies. With them it is safe in humans."
No study data presented
A reference to GMP as 'safe in humans'
ALC-0315
ALC-0159, DSPC
PFIZER LNP
This paper claims "It is just like another fatty compound. You eat salad oil and chips as well"
https://t.co/uncdUpkFnI
No, it is not.
An 80% market for mRNA. Yet, the vector is the bottleneck causing the limitation.
Viral V is almost a 'use once only' bcs of antibody formation.
LNP sole way to push.
READ THE INTRODUCTION... https://t.co/1k4qZeutit
— Not Your Mom (@Notyour28981739) December 24, 2021
mRNA Therapy - with a gargantuan market - in dire need for a vector.
Viral vectors as a dead ally until 2015.
mRNA Therapy meets enormous resentments.
Luckily, billions of people have now got first hand experience. Obviously, AZ was not that useful in the general drift.
LNP instead of a vector
PFIZER BioNtech
ALC-0315
ALC-0159, DSPC
"This product is for research use only and not for human use."
https://t.co/tNsG5wxVCT
'EMA Zulassung ohne
https://t.co/rSOxRFTZwHhttps://t.co/gi40e7mUqIhttps://t.co/3yAElKnXgshttps://t.co/QXYZbFxHRqhttps://t.co/Nb0q026Zvj
— Lexa W. \U0001f1e9\U0001f1ea (@rebew_lexa) December 22, 2021
Official statement by Echelon
Paraphrased - "we do produce it, but only for use in labs.
Pfizer get theirs from other companies. With them it is safe in humans."
No study data presented
A reference to GMP as 'safe in humans'
ALC-0315
ALC-0159, DSPC
PFIZER LNP
This paper claims "It is just like another fatty compound. You eat salad oil and chips as well"
https://t.co/uncdUpkFnI
No, it is not.
Fondation Merieux
2017
Pushing the
CEPI Dialogue
Excellent presentation to see, how they, including Bancel, had layed out the narrative.
Quess, what they had specifically included in their list of targeted viruses?
https://t.co/J5FDe6W986
Fondation Merieux 2017
CEPI
Almost basking about their list being more inclusive, more emergent viruses based.
https://t.co/J5FDe6W986
Fondation Merieux 2017
Narrative: "Look, what ZIKA has done to your populace. Nasty ZIKA."
How much of that ZIKA damage was actually related to a virus? Was there a computer guy, who had invested in mosquitos as a vector?
https://t.co/J5FDe6W986
Fondation Merieux 2017
What is the advanges of a programme like CEPI.
And for who?
Let me translate: They want a coordinated vaccine production, with only one strong production pipeline, and solidly regulated pathsways.
Provide the incentives for big pharma.
They've made it.
Vision - look at nasty ZIKA, you surely do not want that
Mission - get the pipeline going of (only) the big ones
Scope - the anti-cancer platforms with their DNA, mRNA basis fit perfectly. They so far do not sell very well, but they could be recycled.
Correct me, if I am wrong.
2017
Pushing the
CEPI Dialogue
Excellent presentation to see, how they, including Bancel, had layed out the narrative.
Quess, what they had specifically included in their list of targeted viruses?
https://t.co/J5FDe6W986
Fondation Merieux 2017
CEPI
Almost basking about their list being more inclusive, more emergent viruses based.
https://t.co/J5FDe6W986
Fondation Merieux 2017
Narrative: "Look, what ZIKA has done to your populace. Nasty ZIKA."
How much of that ZIKA damage was actually related to a virus? Was there a computer guy, who had invested in mosquitos as a vector?
https://t.co/J5FDe6W986
Fondation Merieux 2017
What is the advanges of a programme like CEPI.
And for who?
Let me translate: They want a coordinated vaccine production, with only one strong production pipeline, and solidly regulated pathsways.
Provide the incentives for big pharma.
They've made it.
Vision - look at nasty ZIKA, you surely do not want that
Mission - get the pipeline going of (only) the big ones
Scope - the anti-cancer platforms with their DNA, mRNA basis fit perfectly. They so far do not sell very well, but they could be recycled.
Correct me, if I am wrong.
You May Also Like
1/x Fort Detrick History
Mr. Patrick, one of the chief scientists at the Army Biological Warfare Laboratories at Fort Detrick in Frederick, Md., held five classified US patents for the process of weaponizing anthrax.
2/x
Under Mr. Patrick’s direction, scientists at Fort Detrick developed a tularemia agent that, if disseminated by airplane, could cause casualties & sickness over 1000s mi². In a 10,000 mi² range, it had 90% casualty rate & 50% fatality rate
3/x His team explored Q fever, plague, & Venezuelan equine encephalitis, testing more than 20 anthrax strains to discern most lethal variety. Fort Detrick scientists used aerosol spray systems inside fountain pens, walking sticks, light bulbs, & even in 1953 Mercury exhaust pipes
4/x After retiring in 1986, Mr. Patrick remained one of the world’s foremost specialists on biological warfare & was a consultant to the CIA, FBI, & US military. He debriefed Soviet defector Ken Alibek, the deputy chief of the Soviet biowarfare program
https://t.co/sHqSaTSqtB
5/x Back in Time
In 1949 the Army created a small team of chemists at "Camp Detrick" called Special Operations Division. Its assignment was to find military uses for toxic bacteria. The coercive use of toxins was a new field, which fascinated Allen Dulles, later head of the CIA
Mr. Patrick, one of the chief scientists at the Army Biological Warfare Laboratories at Fort Detrick in Frederick, Md., held five classified US patents for the process of weaponizing anthrax.
2/x
Under Mr. Patrick’s direction, scientists at Fort Detrick developed a tularemia agent that, if disseminated by airplane, could cause casualties & sickness over 1000s mi². In a 10,000 mi² range, it had 90% casualty rate & 50% fatality rate
3/x His team explored Q fever, plague, & Venezuelan equine encephalitis, testing more than 20 anthrax strains to discern most lethal variety. Fort Detrick scientists used aerosol spray systems inside fountain pens, walking sticks, light bulbs, & even in 1953 Mercury exhaust pipes
4/x After retiring in 1986, Mr. Patrick remained one of the world’s foremost specialists on biological warfare & was a consultant to the CIA, FBI, & US military. He debriefed Soviet defector Ken Alibek, the deputy chief of the Soviet biowarfare program
https://t.co/sHqSaTSqtB
5/x Back in Time
In 1949 the Army created a small team of chemists at "Camp Detrick" called Special Operations Division. Its assignment was to find military uses for toxic bacteria. The coercive use of toxins was a new field, which fascinated Allen Dulles, later head of the CIA
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
