Die Forschung mit Virenmanipulation und mRNA Impfstoffen geht dem schon seitlich weit voraus.
Nachfolgend
- zum Bau des Labors in Wuhan durch BioMerieux -> Bancel jetzt Moderna
- Werbebroschüre BioMerieux (CEPI GAVI Einbindung)
- Moderna ominöser geheimer weiterer Impfstoff
1

@Keane1975 Bau des Labors in Wuhan BioMerieux Beteiligung
2004
https://t.co/JXp0Z9etD6
@Keane1975 Bancel BioMerieux Xi
https://t.co/c510itEdB6
@Keane1975 Mehr zum Bau des Labors durch BioMerieus in Wuhan (Stephane Bancel ex BioMerieux jetzt Moderna)
https://t.co/lc5fRwJe6K
@Keane1975 Bancel BioMerieux Wuhan Moderna

https://t.co/HOnVegMbSA
@Keane1975 Die Original Leaks aus der Zeit des Wuhan Ausbruchs zur Beteiligung von BioMerieux am Labor in Wuhan.

Schon 2020 früh auf Zusammenhänge hingewiesen. Immer wieder tauchte auf 'Virus - Impfstoff Parallelentwicklung'

https://t.co/4fwcm7tNwM
@Keane1975 Biodefense involvement

https://t.co/4E1XBd9gj0
@Keane1975 Fondation Merieux
BioMerieux Wuhan
2017

Pandemic Preparedness presentation.
Auf dem Weg zur Pandemie.
CEPI GAVI
https://t.co/ecev8SMtI4
@Keane1975 Auch von der Seite Baric et al Virus mRNA Stoff Entwicklung

https://t.co/2nOEhzvaPB
.
@Keane1975 DARPA mRNA
https://t.co/cwW1QpzrbN
@Keane1975 More DARPA mRNA
2011 !
https://t.co/QngFdo3vpm
@Keane1975 Sicherheit gegen Gentechnik Geneditierungs Unfall DARPA

https://t.co/Ko9AWgSSyt
@Keane1975 2015
Kongress aller bis dahin führenden mRNA Produktentwickler in Berlin - mit 'guter Aussicht'

https://t.co/j40sltFElm
@Keane1975 Das 'besondere' Mausmodell - für das man Versuche am Menschengewebe in Mäusen machen kann - speziell auch für die Erforschung von Corona Viren
BARIC

https://t.co/F4onKv9iOM
@Keane1975 Sie wussten Details über die Unwirksamkeit von mRNA Impfstoffen.
DARPA 2019
https://t.co/qZ9kRWrJud
@Keane1975 DARPA ' ADEPT '
2013 Moderna Funding
https://t.co/zBotlFgYIl
.
@Keane1975 DARPA zelebriert im Februar 2019 zunächst noch das Produkt der langjährige Entwicklung von mRNA Impfstoffen

https://t.co/8O3yHfnW8C
@Keane1975 Moderna 2017
'2014 ALXN1540 Gene Therapy' beendet in 2015/2016, weil das dann verwendete LNP Todesfälle aufgrund hoher Toxizität in den Trials zeigte.

Aber, es gab ja noch einen 'geheimen' vierten Impfstoff.

Nicht etwas für SARS* ?

'Geheime' Entwicklung
https://t.co/S8kAMNRkNI
@Keane1975 Artikel
Moderna Entwicklungsschritte
Kariko Bancel

https://t.co/A3k9Z8DZhR
@Keane1975 Science Visit to Moderna 2017
Moderna
AstraZeneca

https://t.co/e6M7m7LpGv

https://t.co/getFBiVhkp
.

More from rubic3n

80% of diseases not treatable with 'conventional medicine'. Protein treatment as an alternative with drawbacks.
An 80% market for mRNA. Yet, the vector is the bottleneck causing the limitation.
Viral V is almost a 'use once only' bcs of antibody formation.
LNP sole way to push.


mRNA Therapy - with a gargantuan market - in dire need for a vector.
Viral vectors as a dead ally until 2015.
mRNA Therapy meets enormous resentments.

Luckily, billions of people have now got first hand experience. Obviously, AZ was not that useful in the general drift.


LNP instead of a vector
PFIZER BioNtech

ALC-0315
ALC-0159, DSPC
"This product is for research use only and not for human use."
https://t.co/tNsG5wxVCT

'EMA Zulassung ohne


Official statement by Echelon
Paraphrased - "we do produce it, but only for use in labs.
Pfizer get theirs from other companies. With them it is safe in humans."

No study data presented
A reference to GMP as 'safe in humans'

ALC-0315
ALC-0159, DSPC


PFIZER LNP

This paper claims "It is just like another fatty compound. You eat salad oil and chips as well"

https://t.co/uncdUpkFnI

No, it is not.
Fondation Merieux
2017
Pushing the
CEPI Dialogue

Excellent presentation to see, how they, including Bancel, had layed out the narrative.
Quess, what they had specifically included in their list of targeted viruses?

https://t.co/J5FDe6W986


Fondation Merieux 2017
CEPI
Almost basking about their list being more inclusive, more emergent viruses based.
https://t.co/J5FDe6W986


Fondation Merieux 2017
Narrative: "Look, what ZIKA has done to your populace. Nasty ZIKA."

How much of that ZIKA damage was actually related to a virus? Was there a computer guy, who had invested in mosquitos as a vector?

https://t.co/J5FDe6W986


Fondation Merieux 2017
What is the advanges of a programme like CEPI.

And for who?

Let me translate: They want a coordinated vaccine production, with only one strong production pipeline, and solidly regulated pathsways.
Provide the incentives for big pharma.

They've made it.


Vision - look at nasty ZIKA, you surely do not want that
Mission - get the pipeline going of (only) the big ones
Scope - the anti-cancer platforms with their DNA, mRNA basis fit perfectly. They so far do not sell very well, but they could be recycled.

Correct me, if I am wrong.

You May Also Like

Oh my Goodness!!!

I might have a panic attack due to excitement!!

Read this thread to the end...I just had an epiphany and my mind is blown. Actually, more than blown. More like OBLITERATED! This is the thing! This is the thing that will blow the entire thing out of the water!


Has this man been concealing his true identity?

Is this man a supposed 'dead' Seal Team Six soldier?

Witness protection to be kept safe until the right moment when all will be revealed?!

Who ELSE is alive that may have faked their death/gone into witness protection?


Were "golden tickets" inside the envelopes??


Are these "golden tickets" going to lead to their ultimate undoing?

Review crumbs on the board re: 'gold'.


#SEALTeam6 Trump re-tweeted this.
1/“What would need to be true for you to….X”

Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?

A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:


2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to

- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal

3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:

Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.

Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.

4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?

To get clarity.

You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.

It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.

5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”

Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.