big louis winthorpe III energy

i almost feel bad for the guy, because someone this absolutely clueless about how he sounds really shouldn't be allowed to post under his own name.
he seems like someone who *genuinely* means well most of the time, but it extremely easy to excite and wind up, and who is just profoundly dense about the wisdom of getting wound up the way he does in public.
on the other hand, the tara reade business was indefensible, exploitative, and gross. if there is ever a writer who desperately needs an editor to save him from himself, it's nathan robinson.
i had a few friends in high school who were well-meaning, wealthier than they realized, and in drama class, and most of them grew out of their nathan robinson stage because, well, it was oklahoma. there's almost something a little charming about the fact that he didn't.
he'd be a markedly more likable character if he just owned up to his wealth and advantages, focused on the areas where he's good, quit twitter, and stopped cosplaying as a rumpled mid-atlantic workingman of the late 19th century.
for everything terrible about him, he's still markedly better as a writer, a thinker, and, i'd bet, as a person, than most of the jacobin masthead, and current affairs could be the real deal with a serious, professional and experienced EIC.
listen, nathan robinson, if karl marx didn't need to pretend that he was a poverty-stricken, threadbare newsie just scraping by to survive on these hard, cobblestone streets, you definitely don't need to, either.

More from Marketing

25 Marketing Threads That Will Teach You More Than Any Marketing Class 🧵

1. 10 Marketing Lessons From Steve Jobs That Every Marketer Must Know


2. The Ad Campaign That Changed Advertising Forever


3. How Absolut Vodka Went From 2% Market Share to 50% With One Ad Campaign


4. Why Jeff Bezos named his online bookstore,

You May Also Like

1/“What would need to be true for you to….X”

Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?

A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:


2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to

- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal

3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:

Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.

Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.

4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?

To get clarity.

You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.

It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.

5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”

Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.