When building an audience, optimize for 3 things:

Volume
➡ How many followers?

Affinity
➡ How much do they prefer your tweet to the same one from someone else?

Recursive power
➡ How influential are your followers toward your goals?
Here's how to do marketing:

People follow to be entertained.

Entertain people & remind them that you exist.

You'll be top of mind when they want to sell an e-book or are frustrated by a slow check-out.
Don't make marketing more complicated than it is.

Forget funnels.

@mkobach just wants @Fast to be present to more people & knows 2M > 1M.

@tobydoyhowell just wants people to see MB everywhere & realize that the Brew is inevitable
Fact: people are more relatable than brands

Building your company around a personal brand(s) is a competitive advantage.

@Fast encourages & even helps people to build their personal brands
Marketing is about going to where people are, as much as it is about people coming to you.

Your customers might not be on Twitter, or Clubhouse, or Reddit. But if they are, find the exact community they're a part of.
Creating content is a commitment to consistency. If you can't be consistent, it's likely not for you.
Start out spontaneous, but become strategic. Find tweet opportunities in conversations & on Clubhouse.

But tweet carefully & consider all the perspectives: a single word can decide the success of a tweet.
Finally, selfless people are the most selfish. They know what they want & say so.

In that spirit, please retweet if you enjoyed.

I promised my wife I'd buy her coffee for a week if none of @tobydoyhowell, @shl, @mkobach, or @Julian retweeted.
https://t.co/EnXYo4YSEF

More from Marketing

Copywriting is a superpower.

Learn it and you can sell just about anything.

Use these 7 threads to master copywriting in the next 5 min 🧵

1. How to Write like an


2. 13 ways Apple Persuades Readers With Their


3. Master Business


4. 8 Timeless Copywriting Tips From David

You May Also Like

A brief analysis and comparison of the CSS for Twitter's PWA vs Twitter's legacy desktop website. The difference is dramatic and I'll touch on some reasons why.

Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.

6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices

https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x


PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.

735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices

https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ


The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.

The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.