FIERY OPEN by @JudgeJeanine đ„âWhen 100M people vote before an election & a huge portion are mail-in ballots, extraordinary regulatory oversight is required. When election laws are changed for a Presidential Election on the eve of that election, in violation of the
WHY was the counting stopped?
WHY were observers not
WHY were observers removed from counting areas?
WHY did counters cheer when Republican observers were removed?
WHY were windows boarded up in Detroit so that observers could not observe?
WHY when observers were allowed
And why was there a failure to match signatures on mail-in ballots?
WHY was there destruction of mail-in ballots envelopes, which must contain
WHY does the Voter Integrity Project [@MattBraynard] in GA estimate that over 20k people who no longer meet residency requirements were casting ballots in GA? Where Bidenâs margin is only 12k votes.
Why are statistical anomalies in the chain of custody
WHY are there record numbers of dead people voting?
HOW is it that ballots in pristine condition, w/ out creases, suggesting they had not been in mail-in envelopes, as required by law?
WHY is Joe Biden the 1st candidate to lose FL + OH & still become President?
WHY are 18-19 bellwether counties historically indicative of a presidential win, won by Trump and not Biden?
HOW is it that Biden underperformed Clinton in NY, Chicago & LA, but won in the
How is it that Joe Biden underperformed w/ African Americans everywhere, BUT in those swing-states?
WHY were ballot watchers in PA not allowed to observe to the
HOW is it that the NYTimes, Jimmy Carter & James Baker all agree that absentee ballots are the largest source of fraud that allow for the changes of votes, but now
Bill, did you really have answer to all those questions before your premature comment? Have your US Attorneys even finished their investigations? â
Where are the prosecutions of individuals referred to you by the Inspector General like James Comey
How is it that as soon as you became AG you affirmatively came out protecting Barack Obama and Joe Biden?
Since when does an AG say that? Unless the investigation was complete and you knew they had no involvement? But the again, if the
Do you really want America to believe that one low-level FBI Attorney by the name of Kevin Clinesmith is the only one person responsible for the Russian Collusion delusion?
You affirmatively exonerate Joe Biden
Gee, that would only help Biden, doesnât it?
You say you donât want to weaponized the DOJ against political enemies. Charging someone
You admit the DOJ used one standard for Hillary and another for Trump. You said that. And âyou canât ever allow that to happen again.â How?
Should we write another nonsensical BS
Like I said, Bill. You talk a big game. So
More from Murray đșđž
More from Law
Today the superior court will hear oral arguments in Midtown Citizens Coalition v. Municipality of Anchorage. "MCC" is an unofficial group that opposes the recall of Assembly member Felix Rivera. The question is whether the Muni properly certified the recall petition. #aklaw
Before posting the MCC v. MOA briefs, it's worth noting that the legal arguments made by Rivera's supporters parallel those made by Dunleavy in Recall Dunleavy v. State. Both Rivera and Dunleavy argued that their recall petitions should have been denied by election officials.
So let's play a game called "Who Argued It." Guess which politician, Rivera or Dunleavy, made the following arguments in court:
1. "The grounds for recall stated in the petition are insufficient as a matter of law, and therefore the petition should have been rejected."
2. "Even under Alaskaâs liberal recall standards, courts have not hesitated to find petitions legally insufficient when those petitions did not contain sufficient factual allegations of unlawful activity to state sufficient grounds for recall.â
3. "The allegations must be sufficiently particular to allow the official a meaningful opportunity to respond . . . . [and] ensure that voters have the information they need to vote."
Oral argument in scheduled for January 21 at 3 pm in this case & will be telephonic. To listen, call 1-800-768-2983, code: 2640561#. Alternate phone numbers if the toll-free number gives you trouble: 1-907-206-2349 or 1-913-904-9867 or 1-212-231-3884.
— Alaska Court System (@AlaskaCourt) January 20, 2021
Before posting the MCC v. MOA briefs, it's worth noting that the legal arguments made by Rivera's supporters parallel those made by Dunleavy in Recall Dunleavy v. State. Both Rivera and Dunleavy argued that their recall petitions should have been denied by election officials.
So let's play a game called "Who Argued It." Guess which politician, Rivera or Dunleavy, made the following arguments in court:
1. "The grounds for recall stated in the petition are insufficient as a matter of law, and therefore the petition should have been rejected."
2. "Even under Alaskaâs liberal recall standards, courts have not hesitated to find petitions legally insufficient when those petitions did not contain sufficient factual allegations of unlawful activity to state sufficient grounds for recall.â
3. "The allegations must be sufficiently particular to allow the official a meaningful opportunity to respond . . . . [and] ensure that voters have the information they need to vote."
