I'm slightly obsessed with this "#PenceCard" nonsense which is like the Platonic ideal of the current level of Trump election stealing conspiracy theory nonsense.
Which was a week ago, incidentally.
I expect there will be some meltdowns, but probably even more people seamlessly pivoting to "Well obviously he wouldn't do it in public." or "It's actually January 6th."
Small problem is: he's a defendant in that case, not a plaintiff.
https://t.co/kmPoiQ3KYa
The only really notable feature of the absurd new election lawsuit in D.C. is that the plaintiffs sued Mike Pence in his official capacity, meaning I suppose that the Justice Department will now be obliged to defend him from the many pages of absurdity. https://t.co/PqKLZHWtSI pic.twitter.com/bUc9uWMnD6
— Brad Heath (@bradheath) December 22, 2020
https://t.co/Agqr6NmrbG
There is actually some mystery here. As much as I'd love to see it dismissed under Fed R Civ P 12(b)(1-7)(inclusive), it will probably be narrower. In which case we're looking at any or all of a considerable number of plausible options.
— Mike Dunford (@questauthority) December 23, 2020
Specifically: https://t.co/zv4zMESxZs
https://t.co/4i8Qzz3yLJ
Also, good luck attempting service on the Electoral College, which isn't really an organization or a thing. This is like suing "the states."
— Brad Heath (@bradheath) December 22, 2020
Prison inmates who represent themselves generally avoid goofy stuff like this. pic.twitter.com/Cvbk7v5zzO
More from Alexandra Erin the Meadow We Can Build a Snowman
(DC POLICE) MPD CHIEF : "There was no intelligence that suggests that there would be a breach of the US Capitol. "
— Chris Cioffi (@ReporterCioffi) January 7, 2021
More from Law
The entire first part of the hearing related to messages sent by certain individuals from the Stonewall Trans Advisory Group seeking cooperation with trans allies at Garden Court. So far all the discussion has been about whether their names must remain redacted.
— LGB Alliance (@ALLIANCELGB) February 11, 2021
The judge has ruled that for this hearing only, the names should remain redacted.
It is a Rule 50 Order. These particular individuals are members of Stonewall’s Trans Advisory Group and their names may well be known elsewhere. What is relevant is the messages from the group to Garden Court.
The judge states she would not make the same decision at the full hearing. This is only for the preliminary hearing.
Having dealt with the anonymity issue we now move to the main submissions in the case.