1) Forced Vaccinations, 2) Unlawful Lockdowns 3) The Criminal Misuse 4) Fraudulent Tests on Healthy People
5) The Criminal misuse of 5G Technologies.
6) Economic Terrorism
7) Forcing people
URGENT MESSAGE DO NOT IGNORE SHARE VIRAL.
Greetings Everyone, we have formed an Emergency Grand Jury for Natural Law from Public Health and Justice along with 32 Judges from all around the world who are experts and together we have launched a International Tribunal for
1) Forced Vaccinations, 2) Unlawful Lockdowns 3) The Criminal Misuse 4) Fraudulent Tests on Healthy People
5) The Criminal misuse of 5G Technologies.
6) Economic Terrorism
7) Forcing people
Please find links of our Global Indictments here: https://t.co/7T3nFIUfBL
As many of you may already know, rogue highly corrupt usurpers who have now taken over all our public offices, departments and positions of power are misusing COVID 19 as an excuse to
The are grossly abusing the powers given to them by We The People.
Those in positions of Government and Mainstream Media are Acting as a Corrupt Corporations to facilitate their own special interests and No
In Law this is an ABUSE OF POWER called a Breach of ULTRA VIRES LAWS meaning 'They have gone BEYOND THE SCOPE OF POWERS' That We The People have given them.
We have arrived at a extremely dangerous situation whereby they are now
The company behind the vaccines called Pfizer were already sued by Nigeria in 2013, for harming countless Nigerian victims with their contaminated Testing Kits and now this very same company.(who should have been shut down years ago) are seeking to do the same thing
In addition, there is evidence that 490.000.00 children were paralyzed in India by Bill Gates's
AS THIS IS A CRITICAL STATE OF EMERGENCY - SO WE ARE CALLING FOR UNIFIED WORLDWIDE ACTION THAT REQUIRES EVERYONES INPUT TO HELP US TO IMMEDIATELY STOP THEM BY
1) REPORTING ON OUR INDICTMENT NEWS (make videos on your phones in
2) SHARING OUR INJUNCTION & INDICTMENT CHARGES LINK https://t.co/7T3nFIUfBL
3) Join the hashtag campaign by tweeting #GETTHECRINMALSOUT
#WEDONOTCONSENT
#STOPCOVIDTERRORISM
#STOPVACCINETERRORISM
#STOPCOVIDLIES
If you do not have a social media page or platform,
4) Make a short video of your own public I DO NOT CONSENT DECLARATION AND GET IT VIRAL. WE NEED MILLIONS OF THEM TO BE BLASTED WORLDWIDE.
To get our copy of our existing I DO NOT CONSENT DECLARATION go to twitter page
PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE THIS URGENT MESSAGE HELP GET VIRAL https://t.co/7T3nFIUfBL SEND TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW AS FAST AS POSSIBLE.
You can also visit https://t.co/QN26FwAFba
https://t.co/7T3nFIUfBL
FaceBook / Seven Starseed
Thank You
More from Pharoah Maskfree McFlightrisk
Library update: https://t.co/UvQcjVtxP4
https://t.co/gInQuwg7aq
Remember to register in the Common Law
Common Law
Common Cause
That's where questioning lockdown took me, and this is where they're headed.
— Pharoah Maskfree McFlightrisk (@trestrange) November 8, 2020
Google these linked terms and ask why a reset has an off button.
Shhh...https://t.co/26ebWCY2Ru pic.twitter.com/j3Uvkt822b
https://t.co/gInQuwg7aq
Remember to register in the Common Law
Common Law
Common Cause
More from Law
1/ After a good night's sleep, I have a few thoughts on the impending Ripple lawsuit.
Less schadenfreude, more "what now?" https://t.co/a0oTwblBHB
2/ First of all, the USG is going to lose.
I don't even need to read the complaint. They might force a settlement, but they're outclassed on legal.
Remember Ripple engaged former SEC Chair Mary Jo White in a civil matter in 2018. A hint of their
3/ Second, the USG should lose.
The SEC restrictions on non-accredited investors; the ridiculous Howey test; 80 year old securities law like the "40 Act" all need to die in fire. They are un-American and completely outdated.
I hope Ripple wins. (WUT?)
4/ Third, it's incumbent upon industry to self-police and hold the moral high ground.
I give certain individuals A's and others F's, but as a whole, the most powerful people and companies generally take a Swiss neutrality stance on assets.
So we're effectively in this together.
5/ We're "in this together" to draw lines of regulatory demarcation.
XRP as a "security" further hurts the U.S. businesses while global comps will continue to make these markets.
XRP as a security also means other assets will meet the same fate. At least Ripple has $ to fight.
Less schadenfreude, more "what now?" https://t.co/a0oTwblBHB
BREAKING: The @SEC_News intends to sue @ripple over its sale of XRP, alleging the cryptocurrency is an unregistered security according to @bgarlinghouse.@nikhileshde reportshttps://t.co/7Z3KSWk7dn
— CoinDesk (@CoinDesk) December 22, 2020
2/ First of all, the USG is going to lose.
I don't even need to read the complaint. They might force a settlement, but they're outclassed on legal.
Remember Ripple engaged former SEC Chair Mary Jo White in a civil matter in 2018. A hint of their
3/ Second, the USG should lose.
The SEC restrictions on non-accredited investors; the ridiculous Howey test; 80 year old securities law like the "40 Act" all need to die in fire. They are un-American and completely outdated.
I hope Ripple wins. (WUT?)
4/ Third, it's incumbent upon industry to self-police and hold the moral high ground.
I give certain individuals A's and others F's, but as a whole, the most powerful people and companies generally take a Swiss neutrality stance on assets.
So we're effectively in this together.
5/ We're "in this together" to draw lines of regulatory demarcation.
XRP as a "security" further hurts the U.S. businesses while global comps will continue to make these markets.
XRP as a security also means other assets will meet the same fate. At least Ripple has $ to fight.
We need to talk about the 'expert' witness statement evidence led by Ms Bell in her successful case before the Tavistock. THREAD
You can see who gave evidence in her support from these extracts from the Tavistock's Skeleton Argument.
Helpful for you to bear in mind that her solicitor was a man called Paul Conrathe, who has a long association with the religious right in the US (I have talked about him a number of times but this is as good a starting point as any).
I am not going to address here other criticisms that might be made of the form in which that evidence was given or the timing of its service before the court. I am just going to address, in alphabetical order, the individuals whose evidence Mr Conrathe led on Ms Bell's behalf.
The first witness, alphabetically, was Associate Professor of Sociology at the University of Oxford, Michael Biggs.
Mr Biggs was exposed for posting transphobic statements online under a fake twitter handle: @MrHenryWimbush according to this report.
You can see who gave evidence in her support from these extracts from the Tavistock's Skeleton Argument.
Helpful for you to bear in mind that her solicitor was a man called Paul Conrathe, who has a long association with the religious right in the US (I have talked about him a number of times but this is as good a starting point as any).
In this thread, I noted the lawyer acting against the Tavistock, Paul Conrathe, is using very similar arguments (those under 18 cannot consent at all; or cannot lawfully consent without x conditions) as he has run/is running in a number of cases challenging abortion rights. https://t.co/gJk4c9bUED
— Jo Maugham (@JolyonMaugham) June 21, 2020
I am not going to address here other criticisms that might be made of the form in which that evidence was given or the timing of its service before the court. I am just going to address, in alphabetical order, the individuals whose evidence Mr Conrathe led on Ms Bell's behalf.
The first witness, alphabetically, was Associate Professor of Sociology at the University of Oxford, Michael Biggs.
Mr Biggs was exposed for posting transphobic statements online under a fake twitter handle: @MrHenryWimbush according to this report.
