High volumes could have been better here although I am content with the move from the March lows considering the least risk the setup provided. It is better if we get a strong candle closing above the boundary.
Jubilant Foodworks - updated chart https://t.co/mH1TTqHbcq
Post the capitulation move, I am anticipating an ascending triangle breakout in Jubilant Foodworks however the buy is not triggered yet. That target open would be 667.
— The_Chartist \U0001f4c8 (@charts_zone) April 21, 2022
Ascending triangles also act as key reversal patterns. https://t.co/M1vLYEsngf pic.twitter.com/f06rbJhLaq
More from The_Chartist 📈
Explained you same concept with Elxsi. The real test of a strong Breakout is that the big hand will not give you another chance to buy the share at the breakout level. They will absorb all the selling of weak hands. I mean "STRONG breakout". https://t.co/7fxFqGQl3p
Tata Elxsi ---
— Steve Nison (@nison_steve) June 30, 2021
In the last 10 minutes, all the selling was absorbed despite intraday positions being squared off (if not converted). will wait for the EOD data. However, the chart structure is extremely strong. https://t.co/pci7GCDBEO pic.twitter.com/1NBD9V3mKc
although a must-have portfolio stock. Faced resistance right at the upper channel boundary. Volumes high. Any retracement back to the lower boundary will be an opportunity to accumulate. https://t.co/5uDsUXsbPP
IEX - the resistance turning support. Kindly review, please. @nishkumar1977 @suru27 @rohanshah619 @indian_stockss @sanstocktrader @BissaGauravB @RajarshitaS @PAVLeader @Rishikesh_ADX @VijayThk @Investor_Mohit @TrendTrader85 pic.twitter.com/7CCzmee5If
— Steve Nison (@nison_steve) December 18, 2020
More from Jublfood
Double Top Buy & T20 Pattern - Bullish above 4058.33 daily close on 1% Box Size chart. https://t.co/DPEehZwkS4
JUBLFOOD
— Saket Reddy (@saketreddy) June 24, 2020
Achieved the second target of 1820 today, now near the first target of 1780!
Got a nice 15-20% move till now.
Trailing stop loss is the best thing one can do now! https://t.co/YidPZamyxz
You May Also Like
This New York Times feature shows China with a Gini Index of less than 30, which would make it more equal than Canada, France, or the Netherlands. https://t.co/g3Sv6DZTDE
That's weird. Income inequality in China is legendary.
Let's check this number.
2/The New York Times cites the World Bank's recent report, "Fair Progress? Economic Mobility across Generations Around the World".
The report is available here:
3/The World Bank report has a graph in which it appears to show the same value for China's Gini - under 0.3.
The graph cites the World Development Indicators as its source for the income inequality data.
4/The World Development Indicators are available at the World Bank's website.
Here's the Gini index: https://t.co/MvylQzpX6A
It looks as if the latest estimate for China's Gini is 42.2.
That estimate is from 2012.
5/A Gini of 42.2 would put China in the same neighborhood as the U.S., whose Gini was estimated at 41 in 2013.
I can't find the <30 number anywhere. The only other estimate in the tables for China is from 2008, when it was estimated at 42.8.