Invested in Indian Energy Exchange IEX ? Checkout this blog, all recent blocks in one place. Found useful ? Share with your investor friends &
More from Iexinfo
#IEX
#IEX
● POWER MARKET SEES 8,997 MU VOLUME IN SEPT’21 ACHIEVING 59% YOY GROWTH
● Q2 FY’22 SEES 25,857 MU VOLUME ACROSS MARKET SEGMENTS WITH 57 % YOY
GROWTH
● IEX LAUNCHES VALUE ADDED SERVICES FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATORS
IEX ACHIEVES 59% GROWTH YOY #BREAKING pic.twitter.com/cWZacwq48N
— Redbox India (@REDBOXINDIA) October 1, 2021
#IEX
● POWER MARKET SEES 8,997 MU VOLUME IN SEPT’21 ACHIEVING 59% YOY GROWTH
● Q2 FY’22 SEES 25,857 MU VOLUME ACROSS MARKET SEGMENTS WITH 57 % YOY
GROWTH
● IEX LAUNCHES VALUE ADDED SERVICES FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATORS
Those who are interested in IEX should read this.
While the market size may grow a lot in the next decade, the government policy risk still stays.
Pic 1: PTC Q4FY21 call
Pic 2: PTC Q1FY22 call
https://t.co/eImnTNEZeX
While the market size may grow a lot in the next decade, the government policy risk still stays.
Pic 1: PTC Q4FY21 call
Pic 2: PTC Q1FY22 call
https://t.co/eImnTNEZeX
Long term investing is a peaceful & slow way of creating wealth.And sometime luck plays its role too.
— SmartSyncServices.com (@SmartSyncServ) September 1, 2021
When we researched IEX in 2019 & recommended investors to buy in Mar 2020, we never anticipated such high growth & 470%+ rise in 1.5 Yrs.@MashraniVivekhttps://t.co/qZIdI10ybc pic.twitter.com/v4UYa6fRyn
120: It's just a power exchange
250: Electricity in India won't grow
300: It just makes 4paise per trade
350: MBED will erode it's profitablilty
500: Maybe what @itsTarH said about IEX = NSE + Zerodha was right
570: Buys IEX
#JourneyOfAPessimist
250: Electricity in India won't grow
300: It just makes 4paise per trade
350: MBED will erode it's profitablilty
500: Maybe what @itsTarH said about IEX = NSE + Zerodha was right
570: Buys IEX
#JourneyOfAPessimist
Zerodha + NSE = IEX \U0001f4a1\u26a1\ufe0f
— Tar \u26a1 (@itsTarH) June 20, 2021
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x