Since 1980-90s WS successful ongoing intentional strategy to blend w/fundamentalist W Christian & infiltrate/integrate/take over these spaces; emerging in homeschooling tied to natural CB, attachment style parenting, Le Leche League, Natural child rearing & ecological mov'nts
The problem is that a lot of people on the left don't seem to realize just how much of the crunchy wellness space is taken up by various flavors of far right Christians, which made it a soft target for long game indoctrination.
— Dr. Kathryn Bright Christmas Lights \u2712\ufe0f (@KEBrightbill) December 20, 2020
THIS IS A SOCIAL PROBLEM and both White Supremacists & fundamentalist Christians know it and exploit it for all its worth!
The men in these circles, now 6/
This IS NOT the LEFT's fault ..
THIS IS A SOCIAL PROBLEM....
Its not just that American White men hate women...its that 8/
9/
End
More from kateneuropsych Dr. Kate Shaw MA/MS/PsyD Auntie Fa
THREAD: TRUMP IS A CRIMINAL PSYCHOPATH
I think we've had this exchange B4 yes? Ive said from t/start (despite all who vociferously insisted over& over hes a malignant narcissitic) TRUMP IS A CRIMINAL PSYCHOPATH (whos dementing but that's a diff thread) & have written extensive 1/
threads (see @threadreaderapp) explaining what criminal psychopathy is and why Trump is a criminal psychopath, AKA more formally as Anti-Social Personality Disorder w/Psychopathy (ASPDp).
1) Trump is NOT a Narcissist. He does NOT have NPD and IS NOT a nalignant narcissist 2/
(which BTW isn't even a valid DX, is not in any iteration of the DSM and more importantly IS NOT backed by research)
Lastly (but very importantly) narcissists ARE NOT DRIVEN BY SADISM
2) Trump is NOT a sociopath (someone who due to poverty & social oppression with few if
3/
any other options, is driven to crime to survive; who does not particularly enjoy it but as the only way to survive, become a way of life...eventually you become numb as that's just a fact of life)
4/
3) Trump IS/HAS Anti-Social Personality disorder w/PSYCHOPATHY
which is driven by sadism
i.e. Trump is a PSYCHOPATHIC criminal
Trump IS NOT a sociopath. He does not now nor did he ever need to commit crimes to survuve. TRUMP IS DRIVEN TO CRIME BECAUSE HE ENJOYS 5/
I think we've had this exchange B4 yes? Ive said from t/start (despite all who vociferously insisted over& over hes a malignant narcissitic) TRUMP IS A CRIMINAL PSYCHOPATH (whos dementing but that's a diff thread) & have written extensive 1/
Are you saying he is not a malignant narcissist? A sadistic sociopath? Untreatable?
— Jane Dickerson (@jwdickerson) December 3, 2020
threads (see @threadreaderapp) explaining what criminal psychopathy is and why Trump is a criminal psychopath, AKA more formally as Anti-Social Personality Disorder w/Psychopathy (ASPDp).
1) Trump is NOT a Narcissist. He does NOT have NPD and IS NOT a nalignant narcissist 2/
(which BTW isn't even a valid DX, is not in any iteration of the DSM and more importantly IS NOT backed by research)
Lastly (but very importantly) narcissists ARE NOT DRIVEN BY SADISM
2) Trump is NOT a sociopath (someone who due to poverty & social oppression with few if
3/
any other options, is driven to crime to survive; who does not particularly enjoy it but as the only way to survive, become a way of life...eventually you become numb as that's just a fact of life)
4/
3) Trump IS/HAS Anti-Social Personality disorder w/PSYCHOPATHY
which is driven by sadism
i.e. Trump is a PSYCHOPATHIC criminal
Trump IS NOT a sociopath. He does not now nor did he ever need to commit crimes to survuve. TRUMP IS DRIVEN TO CRIME BECAUSE HE ENJOYS 5/
More from History
You May Also Like
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?