#GRASIM Update
1595 Hit followed by at New HH at 1614.20
Sustenance above 1600 would trigger it towards the channel top.
#StockMarket #StocksToWatch https://t.co/LWCC03F2aM

#GRASIM
— Gurleen (@GurleenKaur_19) August 1, 2021
Parallel channel intact with a series of HL-HH.
Renewed buying interest at the channel bottom with good price volume action.
A follow-up move here would trigger 1595 followed by a new HH. #StockMarket #StocksToWatch pic.twitter.com/XsW0RlfIQd
More from Gurleen
TSL hit 📉
Though at CMP; Time to stack in 📈 for targets of 2620 followed by 2720.
#StockMarket https://t.co/IHHpv2bU2w

#MASTEK Update
— Gurleen (@GurleenKaur_19) July 23, 2021
2800 Hit; 70% Booked and rest Holding for a target of 2900.
#StockMarket #StockToWatch https://t.co/gQTyzf4IUS pic.twitter.com/fp9hrZyv7d
2715 📍
In Weekly; next in-line 2850.
In Monthly; Once ATH is taken out, A sight of 3000+ would be caught.
#StockMarket #StocksInFocus #HDFC https://t.co/VpM9Yvbq7l

#HDFC Daily and Weekly TF's
— Gurleen (@GurleenKaur_19) August 3, 2021
Broken past the descending trendline; A follow-up beyond '2558' would bring in 2630 initially followed by 2850.
In Monthly; Once ATH is taken out, A sight of 3000+ would be caught.
[Will open position above 2558]#StockMarket #StocksToWatch pic.twitter.com/jRukw5Yh6d
You May Also Like
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x