$USOIL
With the inching up of reaction lows, the targets are placed at $125 and $134.
In a different case scenario, Let's not rule out the possibility- If the price continues to sustain above the level of $104, Might see a hit towards the level of $150 as well.
#CrudeOil
More from Gurleen
#BAJFINANCE Update
Once again Above 6342.80; ATH 📍 6477.45
View intact- Sustenance above 6342.80 for the upcoming sessions would trigger new highs towards the channel top.
#StockMarket #StocksToWatch https://t.co/wNH5bJ8oi2
Once again Above 6342.80; ATH 📍 6477.45
View intact- Sustenance above 6342.80 for the upcoming sessions would trigger new highs towards the channel top.
#StockMarket #StocksToWatch https://t.co/wNH5bJ8oi2
#BAJFINANCE
— Gurleen (@GurleenKaur_19) July 29, 2021
Breaking past the previous ATH;
Sustenance above 6342.80 would bring in new highs towards the channel top. #StockMarket #StockToWatch pic.twitter.com/ID8Q3QdFEf
#LAURUSLABS Update
Into a narrow consolidation band post breakout.
Sustained above the zone, Target's intact.
#StockMarket #StocksInFocus https://t.co/lhfemwd4iQ
Into a narrow consolidation band post breakout.
Sustained above the zone, Target's intact.
#StockMarket #StocksInFocus https://t.co/lhfemwd4iQ
#LAURUSLABS Multiple TF Analysis
— Gurleen (@GurleenKaur_19) August 9, 2021
A break-through at ATH.
Sustenance above 698 and a breakout at 705.85 would bring in higher targets of 733 followed by 800 in short term. #StockMarket #StocksToWatch pic.twitter.com/2aaY3BG99D
More from Crudeoil
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x