Categories For later read
https://t.co/nx8ZfDB5Bc
Maintaining open-source is brutal, and feeling obligated to acknowledge, review, and respond to every attempt to contribute is a huge burden to carry.
When I saw this tweet from @dhh the other day I couldn't help but s/email/open source contribution/, but it makes me feel horribly guilty to suggest that anyone should feel anything but grateful for unsolicited free work from
You are not obligated to spend even a moment of your precious time on this planet dealing with emails you did not ask for, do not want, and aren't interested in responding to. The unsolicited email is an assault on our natural proclivity to reciprocity.
— DHH (@dhh) January 25, 2021
But the reality is even though folks are generally trying to help by contributing, those contributions still cost the maintainer more than they cost the contributor, in terms of time to review, stress worrying about making time to review, and long term maintenance.
And unlike email where as long as you can convince yourself it's totally fair to not respond to unsolicited email it's okay, on GitHub there's a public counter signaling to the rest of the world that you are a poor steward of your project if you can't keep the number low.
And also unlike email, the only way to ignore something while also dismissing it from your "inbox" is to take an explicit action (closing the issue/PR) that sends a notification to the person, highlighting how rude you are if you don't craft a thoughtful reason for closing.
So I have a theory on this. And if I'm right, there's bad news about that acceleration in the overall case trend, and possibly good news about vaccines in the over-80s. WARNING: This is going to be another long, maths-y thread (involving cubic coefficients this time!) https://t.co/EiszSAIL9t
— James Ward (@JamesWard73) January 29, 2021
This is one of those university / job interview 'order of magnitude' estimation problems. So feel free to disagree with any or all steps on my logic chain, and please explain why - it will help improve / refine (or falsify) the analysis.
So let's focus on the primary-school-age kids as that's where the effect is strongest. We have 3.5m 5-9 year-olds in England. I don't know how many were in school on 4th Jan - we know some regions (London / Kent etc.) didn't go back, and a lot of schools had INSET days etc
So I'm going to make a wild guess and say 40% were in school on that day. Better ideas (particularly if backed by data) very welcome. So that's about 1.4m children in school
Now ONS tells us that about 1.5% of that age group would test positive for coronavirus in early January. So that's about 20,000 kids with the virus heading into school.
here's a good thought about it
hey this is a really really important thread, if you're a follower of mine i'd really appreciate it if you could read through this https://t.co/6yalBIEotQ
— Goddess of Butterflies (@JuniperTheory) January 17, 2021
and here's another good place to get started on it
[THREAD] https://t.co/Xr5YOxECxp
— Plum, Cat Girl (Festive)\U0001f384 (@BirbBabe) January 17, 2021
this person is saying things about the thread
there's always a lot of stuff vying for yr attention on twitter but try to read this thread, if you can https://t.co/A8PNSgH1LL
— soaked through in digital video (@tvwolfsnake) January 17, 2021
oh jeez did i forget to add part 5 hold on
5. There is no five.https://t.co/dsUDkY4dHa
— Lorxus \U0001f967 (@CoronaCoreanici) January 17, 2021