Categories For later read

7 days 30 days All time Recent Popular
This is my favorite HN thread in a long time, so (positively) surprised at the support in the comments:

https://t.co/nx8ZfDB5Bc

Maintaining open-source is brutal, and feeling obligated to acknowledge, review, and respond to every attempt to contribute is a huge burden to carry.

When I saw this tweet from @dhh the other day I couldn't help but s/email/open source contribution/, but it makes me feel horribly guilty to suggest that anyone should feel anything but grateful for unsolicited free work from


But the reality is even though folks are generally trying to help by contributing, those contributions still cost the maintainer more than they cost the contributor, in terms of time to review, stress worrying about making time to review, and long term maintenance.

And unlike email where as long as you can convince yourself it's totally fair to not respond to unsolicited email it's okay, on GitHub there's a public counter signaling to the rest of the world that you are a poor steward of your project if you can't keep the number low.

And also unlike email, the only way to ignore something while also dismissing it from your "inbox" is to take an explicit action (closing the issue/PR) that sends a notification to the person, highlighting how rude you are if you don't craft a thoughtful reason for closing.
Few comments since this topic is as perennial as the AIT issue among internet H -- of course you may not like it, so don't @ me. The domesticated Bos was a central animal for the subsistence of the Indo-European pastoralists on the steppe. It was also a major domesticate for the


the pre-IE Indian peoples like the Harappans and the neolithic Ash Mound culture of southern India (i.e. the bUti-palli/halli-s; early Dravidians?). What is clear is that these pre-IE & circum-IE entry peoples of India consumed the flesh of cattle. However, it is like the female

animal (henceforth cow) was also valued for milk->curds/cheese(?) among both the Harappan and Ash Mound peoples. The former probably also used them as draught animals. The situation was similar with the IEans on the steppe with their version of Bos cattle playing a major role in

food (both diary and flesh) and as draught animals. Given their value for the IEans, the idea of the protection of cattle was central to their culture (independently of them consuming their flesh). Thus, the cattle raids& countering such were very central to their imagination.

Hence, we may infer that the concept of cattle-protection, emerged entirely independently of their consumption among the steppe IEans. For a IEan king whose wealth was animal herds such protection was a central role. Hence, the ideal of go-pAlana emerged long before beef-taboo.
A THREAD OF PEOPLE DISCUSSING MY THREAD:

here's a good thought about it


and here's another good place to get started on it


this person is saying things about the thread


oh jeez did i forget to add part 5 hold on
The Enemy


https://t.co/2r3zHhkXMq


Goal of the Globalist Project: The "Genocide of the Vital for the Profit of the Profitable Occult". Means of Financing the Project: Among other things, using Humanitarian Aid, International Food Aid in order to finance the "Multinationals" of the 6.6.6.

To achieve this goal, it is imperative to be able to infiltrate the Media (Radio, Television, Newspapers), the circles of "Fashion" and "Culture" (the circles of New Music) by which we will undoubtedly influence all layers of Western Societies.

Thus by keeping the youth (the adults of tomorrow) under the control of the "Senses", we will consequently have the free way to infiltrate, and to transform in depth, without being worried, the Politics, the Legal System and Education;