Categories For later read

7 days 30 days All time Recent Popular
Here the big people you requested. Now delete your tweets:

1. Haafidh Ibn Hajr said, “I asked my Shaikh Siraaj ud deen al-Balqayaanee about Ibn Arabee and he replied quickly he is kaafir (disbeliever)”{Leesaan ul-Meezaan(4/319), another edn (5/213),


…Tambiyyatul-Ghabee Ilaa Takfeer Ibn Arabee (pg.159)}

2. Muhaddith Baqaa’ee wrote our teacher Haafidh Ibn Hajr and another man called Ibn al-Ameen had a mubaahilah concerning Ibn Arabee. The man said, “If Ibn Arabee is upon misguidance then curse me.”

Haafidh Ibn Hajr said, “Oh Allaah if Ibn Arabee is upon guidance then curse me.” After a few months the man became blind and died during the night.
{Tambiyyatul-Ghabee (pg.136-137)}

3. Haafidh Ibn Daqeeq al-Eed asked Abu Muhammad Izz ud deen Abdul Azeez bin Abdus Salaam as-Silmee ad-Damashqee (660H) about Ibn Arabee and he replied, “Dirty, liar and far from the truth, he opined time was old and he did not consider other peoples private parts to be…

…haraam.”
{al-Wafaa Bal-Wafyaat (4/125) with an authentic chain, Tambiyyatul-Ghabee (pg.138)}
A THREAD OF PEOPLE DISCUSSING MY THREAD:

here's a good thought about it


and here's another good place to get started on it


this person is saying things about the thread


oh jeez did i forget to add part 5 hold on
........

I have no words.


Sadly @ezralevant needs someone to help him understand more about the US/US politics and what has been unfolding for decades.

Call me Ezra I can help.


1/ The history of and threats to scientific publishing


2/ the reality of fact checkers


3/ How we got here (work in progress)
I've had a lot of positive comments on this theory, and some helpful challenges. The most common of which was: surely a single-day effect wouldn't be big enough to cause the 'twist' in the data that we're seeing in those age groups? So I set out to find out if it was (thread)


This is one of those university / job interview 'order of magnitude' estimation problems. So feel free to disagree with any or all steps on my logic chain, and please explain why - it will help improve / refine (or falsify) the analysis.

So let's focus on the primary-school-age kids as that's where the effect is strongest. We have 3.5m 5-9 year-olds in England. I don't know how many were in school on 4th Jan - we know some regions (London / Kent etc.) didn't go back, and a lot of schools had INSET days etc

So I'm going to make a wild guess and say 40% were in school on that day. Better ideas (particularly if backed by data) very welcome. So that's about 1.4m children in school

Now ONS tells us that about 1.5% of that age group would test positive for coronavirus in early January. So that's about 20,000 kids with the virus heading into school.