Gematria decode ... very powerful and a bit moving too, at the end ... https://t.co/D6s7zEev80
\U0001f4a5INdiGO ASCenSiON\U0001f4a5..........................................................\U0001f4a5
— SPACEX (@SPACEX25587506) December 29, 2020
\U0001f4a5.......................................................\U0001f4a5..................\U0001f4a5... ...... .........\u267e pic.twitter.com/dW24cc8ruv
More from ๐นโ๏ธ โ๏ธ ๐ฎ๐ฝ๐๐๐ฝ๐พ๐๐ถ๐ฝ โ๏ธ โ๏ธ ๐น
\U0001f4a5ViCToRy\U0001f4a5iS OuRS \U0001f4a5.......................................................\U0001f4a5
— SPACEX (@SPACEX25587506) December 13, 2020
\U0001f4a5..............................................................................\U0001f4a5... ...... .........\u267e pic.twitter.com/r8L32gnZmh
https://t.co/LEY7ZuSj0i
https://t.co/aFNhQhVP6Q
https://t.co/9Ai0QXAIcg
https://t.co/ekTV5auW6s
PuRiFiCaTiOn \u26aa\ufe0f TiMe........................................................................
— SPACEX (@SPACEX25587506) December 11, 2020
............................................................................................. ... ...... .........\u267e pic.twitter.com/wFBsTQwJEX
https://t.co/StVLKc0G7k
https://t.co/7GR4q4sBNQ
https://t.co/5edvpWoJfw
https://t.co/yvMJWdQlJC
Divine being of light, I will not have one word spoken against this man. And if you do, you are dead to me.
That's it.
Sorry. Not sorry.
โค๏ธ๐๐โจ
I just want to stop the world from killing itself!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 11, 2020
Gematria 2952 ... =11 7 = 18
https://t.co/aG1zzDoCad
https://t.co/ZazQksLbWE
https://t.co/CUXFxxKQDy
At the moment, POTUS is sitting on a stack of Trump cards that he's just waiting to unleash...a royal flush!
@John_F_Kennnedy @Pamelal33566076 @GeorgePapa19 @whitebunny @atvguy @stormis_us
This is the Calm...in the Eye of the Storm. pic.twitter.com/Zl7D48TAlf
— AltarOfEgo (@unidentifiedta1) December 31, 2020
He has court cases that will go to the Supreme Court and thanks to the Texas case, he's now aware how to file them properly... under article 3 not 2...
so the SCOTUS will be forced to listen.....He now has the DNI report. Barr stepped down and can now be a witness.....he did his job. Durham is special counsel and can prosecute, in any state....
Heโs letting civil, criminal, and federal courts fail to handle the situation properly.....so he can use military tribunals. He has ALL the data from the NSA, the Kraken supercomputer, the Alice supercomputer and likely many more computers, unknown to us....
He has the dueling electors from 7 state legislatures. He has VP Pence, as the final arbiter of which ballots to accept.. the NDAA, the national emergency, the 14th amendment, the 2018 executive order, the 2017 very first EO, the Patriot Act, the FISA warrants,
More from For later read
This is an excellent report, and I'm glad to have joined the study group. The central focus on avoiding war is understandable--a US-China war would be catastrophic and should be avoided. But protecting Taiwan's security and prosperity requires doing more. 1/x https://t.co/P0Sg4LJcpV
— Bonnie Glaser / \u845b\u4f86\u5100 (@BonnieGlaser) February 12, 2021
Normally as it might seem churlish to be so critical, but @cfr is so high-profile & the co-authors so distinguished I think itโs key to be clear. If not, people - including in Beijing - could get the wrong idea & this report could do real harm if influential on defense issues. 2/
BLUF: The defense discussion in this report does not engage at the depth needed to add to this critical debate. Accordingly conclusions in report are ill-founded - & in key parts harmful/misleading, esp that US shldnt be prepared defend Taiwan directly (alongside own efforts). 3/
The root of the problem is that report doesn't engage w the real debate on TWN defense issues or, frankly, the facts as knowable in public. Perhaps the most direct proof of this: The citations. There is nothing in the citations to @DeptofDefense China Military Power Report...4/
Nor to vast majority of leading informed sources on this like Ochmanek, the @RANDCorporation Scorecard, @CNAS, etc. This is esp salient b/c co-authors by their own admission have v little insight into contemporary military issues. & both last served in govt in Bush 43. 5/