They mainstreamed paying for independent writing, and changed the lives of thousands of writers in the process.
But they're building for a specific type of creator.
Interesting point from @JayCoDon on why he left Substack.
— Austin Rief \u2615\ufe0f (@austin_rief) December 16, 2020
"Substack" becoming synonymous with "newsletter" on Twitter certainly has its pros.
But, there are also cons that may turn off future creators. pic.twitter.com/o5BhWxFv4x
Since this NYer article about Substack quotes a paragraph from my blog post about MultiSKU Creators but doesn't link to ithttps://t.co/QS206eYRsT
— \U0001f468\U0001f3fb\u200d\U0001f4bb\u2615\ufe0f (@hunterwalk) December 28, 2020
Refusal to link credit is one persistent example of how traditional media still doesn't truly embrace internet culture https://t.co/FUDvLgamBI
You can now run paid newsletters through @ConvertKit!
— Nathan Barry (@nathanbarry) November 11, 2020
Here's why you'll love it:
- Free for up to 1,000 subscribers
- 3.5% payment fees (compared to 12.9% for Substack)
- Very customizable custom designs
- Subscriber referral programs
- Automations to drive more sales pic.twitter.com/eH6JfFCyzP
4/10
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) October 22, 2020
...indication, first of all that testing for a (single) respiratory virus is done outside of surveillance systems or need for specific therapy, but even so the lack of consideration of Ct, symptoms and clinical findings when interpreting its result. https://t.co/gHH6kwRdZG
6/10
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) October 22, 2020
The neither validated nor standardised hypersensitive RT-PCR test / Ct 35-45 for SARS-CoV-2 is abused to mislabel (also) other diseases, especially influenza, as COVID-19.https://t.co/AkFIfTCTkS
External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results.https://t.co/mbNY8bdw1p pic.twitter.com/OQBD4grMth
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) November 29, 2020
Thread web\u2b06\ufe0f\u2b07\ufe0f
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) December 16, 2020
The fabrication of the "asymptomatic (super) spreader" is the coronation of the total nons(ci)ense in the belief system of #CoronasWitnesses.
Asymptomatic transmission 0.7%; 95% CI 0%-4.9% - could well be 0%!https://t.co/VeZTzxXfvT
8/8
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) March 24, 2020
By the way, who the f*** created this obviously (almost) worldwide definition of #CoronaDeath?
This is not only medical malpractice, this is utterly insane!https://t.co/FFsTx4L2mw