Specifically, it would raise the minimum wage to $9.50 on the day of passage, then by $1.50 one year later, increasing by $1.50 each year until it reached $15 in 2025.

One other detail that the NBC screenshots leave out: After 2025, this bill would index the minimum wage to median wages, raising it automatically every year. https://t.co/StmCH7PVYT
Here's the full text of the bill. https://t.co/oD5yT2oK3R
The minimum wage bill introduced today would phase out the tipped minimum wage loophole, raising it by $2.50 a year until the tipped minimum wage reached parity with the regular minimum wage in 2025.
Similarly, it phases out the separate minimum wage for disabled workers on the same timetable.
The timeline for the minimum wage hike in this bill sucks, but the indexing and elimination of sub-minimum wages for tipped and disabled workers is really good and important.
(There's a reason why Bernie and Jayapal are lead sponsors on this bill.)
To answer a couple of questions people have asked: First, most of the provisions of this bill would take effect before the 2024 election, if the bill passes this year.
If this bill passes in its present form this year, the minimum wage will be $14 on Election Day 2024, and the sub-minimum wage for tipped and disabled workers will be $12.50, en route to being phased out entirely the following year.
Second, any midterm Democratic congressional losses wouldn't effect the law, since Biden could veto any attempt to repeal or amend it while he remained in office.
Third, any attempt to rescind the final-year raises or the subsequent indexing couldn't be implemented by a president alone—they'd have to pass congress as well.
Fourth, the indexing after the minimum reaches $15 pegs the minimum wage to the median wage nationally. It can't go down if that median goes down, and goes up by a parallel percentage to the median.
(Most years, indexing to the median wage is better for workers than indexing to inflation—by my calculation, if the 2009 $7.25 minimum wage had been indexed to median wages it'd be a bit over $10 now, but only about $9 if indexed to inflation.)
Good question. And no, the Labor Secretary's role is just to calculate and announce the amount of the wage hike, based on the median national wage as determined by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The Secretary doesn't have discretion in setting the wage. https://t.co/JtI1Tbu0b1
Wow. here's something interesting—this bill is actually considerably BETTER than the symbolic minimum wage bill the Dems passed in the House in 2019. https://t.co/GuaUnlArpU
The 2019 bill, like this one, phased in completely in 2025, but with smaller, later incremental steps. And while it narrowed the tipped-wage and disabled-worker gaps, it didn't eliminate them entirely, even in the final phase of the bill.
(The 2019 bill would have eliminated the youth minimum wage, which this bill also does, on a similar time schedule.) https://t.co/Rpb0wuv5Vc
In 2019, the Dems knew their bill was going nowhere. That this one is more aggressive both in benchmarks and in principles is a good sign.

More from Finance

Ivor Cummins has been wrong (or lying) almost entirely throughout this pandemic and got paid handsomly for it.

He has been wrong (or lying) so often that it will be nearly impossible for me to track every grift, lie, deceit, manipulation he has pulled. I will use...


... other sources who have been trying to shine on light on this grifter (as I have tried to do, time and again:


Example #1: "Still not seeing Sweden signal versus Denmark really"... There it was (Images attached).
19 to 80 is an over 300% difference.

Tweet: https://t.co/36FnYnsRT9


Example #2 - "Yes, I'm comparing the Noridcs / No, you cannot compare the Nordics."

I wonder why...

Tweets: https://t.co/XLfoX4rpck / https://t.co/vjE1ctLU5x


Example #3 - "I'm only looking at what makes the data fit in my favour" a.k.a moving the goalposts.

Tweets: https://t.co/vcDpTu3qyj / https://t.co/CA3N6hC2Lq
I'm lucky to attain financial freedom before 30.

I credit Fintwit for my learnings.

Here's 10 key concepts every investor must know:

1. $$ needed to retire
2. Researching a business
3. Reading annual reports
4. Reading earnings calls
5. Criteria of a multi bagger

(Read on...)

6. Holding a multi bagger
7. Economic moats
8. When to buy a stock
9. Earnings vs cashflow
10. Traits of quality companies

Here's my 10 favourite threads on these concepts:

1. How much $$ do you need to retire

Before you start, you must know the end game.

To meet your retirement goals...

How much $$ do you need in your portfolio?

10-K Diver does a good job explaining what's a safe withdrawl rate.

Hint: It's NOT


2. Research a business

Your investment returns are a lagging indicator.

Instead, your research skills are the leading predictor of your results.

Conclusion?

To be a good investor, you must be a great business researcher.

Start with


3. Reading annual reports

This is the bread and butter of a good business analyst.

You cannot just listen to opinions from others.

You must learn to deep dive a business and make your own judgments.

Start with the 10k.

Ming Zhao explains it

You May Also Like