A farmer from Abohar - Fazilka region of Punjab has the following to say..
I have been actively farming for 2 decades now & I have witnessed many things happening at the APMC’s..I have seen classification of C grade grain miraculously change into B grade..
Similarly I have also

witnessed the weigh bridge weigh in the empty truck at 39 tons and the full truck at 55 tons and later found that the unloaded truck weighed 43 tons at another weigh bridge.
There are over 30,000 registered arthiyas in Punjab.
These 30,000 employ another 3,00,000 sub agents or
sidekicks or people who wouldn’t have made it into doing anything anyplace were it not for the patronage network of these 30,000. There are only 1500 farming villages in Punjab.
So 3,30,000 divided by1500 is about 220 people on average per village doing the work of middlemen.
Why is this the case? It’s a long story and high time people are made aware.
We had a food shortage & a hand to mouth existence until the 1970’s.
Norman Borlaugh pioneered a variety of wheat which gave 10 X the yield but needed 3X the fertiliser.
The Punjab was chosen as the battleground against hunger. Enterprising Sikh farmers worked hard to create what we know as the Green Revolution.
Since there were huge shortages, laws were made which didn’t allow for stockholding or selling at farm gates.
Then came the Essential Commodities Act/
APMC Act (farmers were compelled to sell only at APMC’s to licensed traders - remember license permit quota Raj)
As an assurance to the farmer for his hard work, Minimum Support Price(MSP) was guaranteed..
No matter what the quantum the sarkar would pick it up & provide farmers with a minimum amount as compensation per quintal or ton as the case maybe..
Getting money out of the sarkari treasury was a laborious process. Thus was born the breed of middle men who walked the corridors
of power & worked with corrupt sarkari babus! Not forgetting political patronage! Thus networks flourished..
220:1 is the ratio of middlemen to a single village in Punjab today..
This business got integrated backwards &
corruption was professionalized..
For instance there are families who own very large tracts of land (100 acre plus holding)..
The thekedar comes & takes the theka of growing on the land. For those unfamiliar with the word, Theka is also referred to as contract. I know there are grumblings about corporates
contracting with farmers directly now. I also know why. You should too.
Anyway to cut a long story short plenty of farmers do not receive their due at the end of each cropping season..
What is grown?
What grade or quality?
For how much is it sold?
For how much is it sold?
Would it have fetched a similar price in the open market?
Where is it sold?
How is it sold?
Who’s the end beneficiary?
Does anybody consume it or does it go waste?
Was there a better way to do what’s being done?
Does anyone care to think on the above questions?
As long as 1receives his cheque why should he care?
The Jamkhedkar committee reports that over 40%of the grain acquired under MSP by FCI is either unfit for consumption or is simply wasted.1out of every 2 kgs acquired is wasted..
Years of corruption have today given birth to this..
MSP has ensured that there is no necessity to seek a profitable enterprise..
It has also given birth to the patronage networks which survive off the sarkari treasury and refuse to breakaway..
It has given rise to a political class which thrives & survives on corruption n dishonesty
There was no sunset clause on this. Nobody foresaw a time of surplus production on food grains..
Result is other states like Haryana, UP, Bihar, Rajasthan & MP all produce surplus of grain
They also have their own MSP mechanisms which have proliferated & created similar political patronage networks..
Since more is acquired at Mandis in Punjab, grain from UP/Bihar also find their way into the mandi system of Punjab..
The trucks being under weight and over paid for &
the grades changing are common malpractices. One can go for a few days to the mandi & figure out how to make a killing by doing this..
Soon enough, you will also be one of those “know it all” in the mandi. After all information is power
All this is paid for by you dear tax payer
The annual bill for this is approximately 8 lakh crores.
Why don’t the farmers grow something else?
Something more profitable?
The truth is if I am being paid for doing 'NOTHING', why bother with competing!
What is the incentive to compete?
I would rather go and picket the roads leading into Delhi to ensure that the existing system isn’t threatened..
QUITE A RACKET!!!!!!!!
WHAT A SHAME!!
#ModiHaiToMumkinHai
#ModiWithFarmers
#BharatBandhNahiHoga
Long thread my friends..
Tagging
@mayfair1958
@shivaniojha
@rohit121171
@aparnasridhar7
@chittukuruvi4
@JumbuTweeple
@SriRamya21
@Maha_periyava_
@ind_vignesh

More from Farmer protest

Do read this thread. 🙏
Since Farmers protest, Troll Army has been hyperactive digging out old and unrelated vidoes/images and linking it to Farmers protest to demean the protesters. Just like they did for CAA/NRC protesters in Dec-Feb.
Here are a few #AltNewsFactCheck
1/n

A photo that predates both the farmers' protest and the introduction of agricultural reform ordinances approved in June was falsely shared as Muslim man disguised as Sikh to participate in the agitation. #AltNewsFactCheck
2/n
https://t.co/y37jn81Gw9


A photo of an elderly woman participating in a farmers' protest in Punjab in October was shared with the false claim that she is 'Shaheen Bagh Dadi' Bilkis Bano who was present in the recent farmers' protest. #AltNewsFactCheck 3/n

https://t.co/VU524UGTw4


An old video of few Sikhs along with Pakistani fans raising pro-Pak, Khalistan chants during cricket World Cup match in UK is viral as farmers' protest. BJP's Priti Gandhi, Punit Agwaral shared this and later took it down. #AltNewsFactCheck 4/n
https://t.co/i2f2myjfxK


A photograph shot during anti-CAA protests in Shaheen Bagh in February has been shared with the false claim that it shows 'Hathras Bhabhi' at farmers' protest. #AltNewsFactCheck 5/n
https://t.co/ucZ6s44j5U

You May Also Like

I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x


The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x

Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x

The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x

It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x