4. Then manually select the stocks which are going to give all time high BO or 52 high BO or already given.
Trading view scanner process -
1 - open trading view in your browser and select stock scanner in left corner down side .
2 - touch the percentage% gain change ( and u can see higest gainer of today)
Making thread \U0001f9f5 on trading view scanner by which you can select intraday and btst stocks .
— Vikrant (@Trading0secrets) October 22, 2021
In just few hours (Without any watchlist)
Some manual efforts u have to put on it.
Soon going to share the process with u whenever it will be ready .
"How's the josh?"guys \U0001f57a\U0001f3b7\U0001f483
4. Then manually select the stocks which are going to give all time high BO or 52 high BO or already given.
6 . If in 15 min chart📊 any stock sustaing near BO zone or after BO then select it on your watchlist
7 . Now next day if any stock show momentum u can take trade in it with RM
U will amazed to see it's result if you follow proper risk management.
I did 4x my capital by trading in only momentum stocks.
I will keep sharing such learning thread 🧵 for you 🙏💞🙏
Keep learning / keep sharing 🙏
@AdityaTodmal
More from Vikrant
The cash strategy 👇☢️👇
1⃣ #stock selection process - always choose that stock which are consolidating near all time high.
(Because whenever stock will give all time high breakout then it will easily give 20/30% return in 1/2 months
U can use trading view scanner for that.
2⃣volume analysis - In that consolidating period volume should be high of up move days then down move days. And last 3/4 month volume of accumulation is much higher.
3️⃣ fund diversification - always deploy your capital in 3/4 stocks, not more then that or not less then 3.
And, your 3/4 stocks must be from different different sectors.
4⃣comunding magic - If you hold 10 stocks then if 2 stocks will give 100% return then portfolio impact is 20% only. (here time period is 8/15 months)
If you hold 3 stocks out of them 2 will give 40% then ur portfolio impact is 25%
(Here time period is 1/3 months)
5⃣sectors analysis - always choose that sector stocks which are near support or breakout stage.
If any stocks is out of nifty sector then u can open stock scanner website and check their peer charts. If out of 5 , 3 are strong then u can select that company.
1⃣ #stock selection process - always choose that stock which are consolidating near all time high.
(Because whenever stock will give all time high breakout then it will easily give 20/30% return in 1/2 months
U can use trading view scanner for that.
How I turned 7lac account to 33lac in just 1 year only by cash trading.
— Vikrant (@Trading0secrets) October 14, 2021
Soon going to make full thread about my strategy of cash by which this happened.
And for cash hedging I started option selling in different a/c.
How many of u intrested for that thread? \U0001f499\U0001f49b\U0001f499 pic.twitter.com/wIyfE8fwfw
2⃣volume analysis - In that consolidating period volume should be high of up move days then down move days. And last 3/4 month volume of accumulation is much higher.
3️⃣ fund diversification - always deploy your capital in 3/4 stocks, not more then that or not less then 3.
And, your 3/4 stocks must be from different different sectors.
4⃣comunding magic - If you hold 10 stocks then if 2 stocks will give 100% return then portfolio impact is 20% only. (here time period is 8/15 months)
If you hold 3 stocks out of them 2 will give 40% then ur portfolio impact is 25%
(Here time period is 1/3 months)
5⃣sectors analysis - always choose that sector stocks which are near support or breakout stage.
If any stocks is out of nifty sector then u can open stock scanner website and check their peer charts. If out of 5 , 3 are strong then u can select that company.
I really love ❤ every tweet of @markminervini sir
But out them 5 are incredible 👍
Which are also summary of his book.
Here are that five 5⃣ tweets 👇
https://t.co/vKMVxF137t
https://t.co/nGrDHlRkuA
https://t.co/8DtxnJf0Bo
https://t.co/ROihOUjesI
But out them 5 are incredible 👍
Which are also summary of his book.
Here are that five 5⃣ tweets 👇
https://t.co/vKMVxF137t
Ignore the naysayers. They will always be here and they will always be skeptical of your dreams and try to discourage you. Success is the best revenge. And now I'll hear the excuses for my 2021 USIC performance as well. LOL! pic.twitter.com/2hziplVEzf
— Mark Minervini (@markminervini) September 29, 2021
https://t.co/nGrDHlRkuA
Rules I built a 38-year career on...
— Mark Minervini (@markminervini) December 23, 2021
1. always use a stop loss
2. define your stop before you enter
3. never risk more than you expect to gain
4. nail down decent profits
5. never let a good size gain turn into a loss
6. never average down
7. never get bold when running cold
https://t.co/8DtxnJf0Bo
If you want to make great returns consistently and do it w/ minimal drawdown, you must get off the idea of being right or wrong and instead learn how to lose much less when you're wrong than you make when you're right. I'm wrong just as much as I'm right. That's why I use stops.
— Mark Minervini (@markminervini) July 20, 2021
https://t.co/ROihOUjesI
I dedicated 37 years to learning and perfecting the craft of stock trading. If there was a way around risk management, I probably would have found it. PhDs, Nobel prize winners and geniuses haven't been able to do it. Your losses must be managed smaller than your gains.. period.
— Mark Minervini (@markminervini) July 5, 2021
More from Equity
You May Also Like
1/12
RT-PCR corona (test) scam
Symptomatic people are tested for one and only one respiratory virus. This means that other acute respiratory infections are reclassified as
2/12
It is tested exquisitely with a hypersensitive non-specific RT-PCR test / Ct >35 (>30 is nonsense, >35 is madness), without considering Ct and clinical context. This means that more acute respiratory infections are reclassified as
3/12
The Drosten RT-PCR test is fabricated in a way that each country and laboratory perform it differently at too high Ct and that the high rate of false positives increases massively due to cross-reaction with other (corona) viruses in the "flu
4/12
Even asymptomatic, previously called healthy, people are tested (en masse) in this way, although there is no epidemiologically relevant asymptomatic transmission. This means that even healthy people are declared as COVID
5/12
Deaths within 28 days after a positive RT-PCR test from whatever cause are designated as deaths WITH COVID. This means that other causes of death are reclassified as
RT-PCR corona (test) scam
Symptomatic people are tested for one and only one respiratory virus. This means that other acute respiratory infections are reclassified as
4/10
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) October 22, 2020
...indication, first of all that testing for a (single) respiratory virus is done outside of surveillance systems or need for specific therapy, but even so the lack of consideration of Ct, symptoms and clinical findings when interpreting its result. https://t.co/gHH6kwRdZG
2/12
It is tested exquisitely with a hypersensitive non-specific RT-PCR test / Ct >35 (>30 is nonsense, >35 is madness), without considering Ct and clinical context. This means that more acute respiratory infections are reclassified as
6/10
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) October 22, 2020
The neither validated nor standardised hypersensitive RT-PCR test / Ct 35-45 for SARS-CoV-2 is abused to mislabel (also) other diseases, especially influenza, as COVID-19.https://t.co/AkFIfTCTkS
3/12
The Drosten RT-PCR test is fabricated in a way that each country and laboratory perform it differently at too high Ct and that the high rate of false positives increases massively due to cross-reaction with other (corona) viruses in the "flu
External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results.https://t.co/mbNY8bdw1p pic.twitter.com/OQBD4grMth
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) November 29, 2020
4/12
Even asymptomatic, previously called healthy, people are tested (en masse) in this way, although there is no epidemiologically relevant asymptomatic transmission. This means that even healthy people are declared as COVID
Thread web\u2b06\ufe0f\u2b07\ufe0f
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) December 16, 2020
The fabrication of the "asymptomatic (super) spreader" is the coronation of the total nons(ci)ense in the belief system of #CoronasWitnesses.
Asymptomatic transmission 0.7%; 95% CI 0%-4.9% - could well be 0%!https://t.co/VeZTzxXfvT
5/12
Deaths within 28 days after a positive RT-PCR test from whatever cause are designated as deaths WITH COVID. This means that other causes of death are reclassified as
8/8
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) March 24, 2020
By the way, who the f*** created this obviously (almost) worldwide definition of #CoronaDeath?
This is not only medical malpractice, this is utterly insane!https://t.co/FFsTx4L2mw
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".