My SCREENING TECHNIQUE Based #hypothetical #Portfolio
6th Upd - 26Sep2021

📍Purely based on my Financial Data Screening !

NO TIPS!
NO MEDIA!

📌#Screener Names in👇🧵summarizes Fundamental, Momentum, Valuation traits hence saves tons of analysis time.

@Vivek_Investor

1

Stocks & Screening Technique Methodologies !

@Coolfundoo 🌟25 , 22, 20, 19

2
Stocks & Screening Technique Methodologies !

@Coolfundoo 🌟18, 17, 16

3
Stocks & Screening Technique Methodologies !

@Coolfundoo 🌟15, 14

4
Stocks & Screening Technique Methodologies !

@Coolfundoo 🌟 14 (continued), 13, 12

5
Stocks & Screening Technique Methodologies !

@Coolfundoo 🌟 11, 10

6
Stocks & Screening Technique Methodologies !

@Coolfundoo 🌟 9, 8

7
Stocks & Screening Technique Methodologies !

@Coolfundoo 🌟 7, 6

8
Stocks & Screening Technique Methodologies !

@Coolfundoo 🌟6 continued

9
Stocks & Screening Technique Methodologies !

@Coolfundoo 🌟5

10
Stocks & Screening Technique Methodologies !

@Coolfundoo 🌟4

11
Stocks & Screening Technique Methodologies !

@Coolfundoo 🌟3

12
How can you use this #thread ?

If you find your business in the above list, read the #screener names which are elaborate enough to tell various fundamental, momentum, valuation traits thus giving head-start for the research.

RT 1st #tweet 🔝if this helps !
@Atulsingh_asan

13

More from Screening Stocks Enjoy 'My StressBusters'

More from Screeners

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?