1/ Unit economic for founders thread.

Despite being a founder and a student of the subject, I missed out on a key point growing up.

Length of relationship with your customers, order frequency, product usage and utility matter.

They didn't teach me this in business school.

2/ Structured right, products used daily vs weekly vs monthly vs yearly lead to different profitability and scalability paths.

Quiz. Which business would you pick?

a) Enterprise software - US$ 250k one time license
b) Enterprise software - US$ 30k/month recurring subscription
3/ Sound's obvious? Which one did you pick?

Twice in my life I picked A. They were both great businesses, but they didn't compare to B. Especially in the long run.

Looking back, with hindsight, I know I should have picked B.

Why?
4/ Bringing in customers is hard.

When those customers leave after a few orders, your investment in that relationship is written off.

But it is not just about the relationship or investment. It is also about scale.

What are the easiest ways to scale a business?
5/ Think about it?

a) Get more customers - acquire
b) Get existing customers to order again - retain
c) Increase order size - up sell
d) Increase order frequency - cross sell / new use case
e) Get existing customers to get you new customers - referral

(b) to (e) are free.
6/ This links back to Life time value (LTV) of a customer. LTV is a function of:

a) Length of relationship
b) Order frequency
c) Order Size
d) Contribution Margin
e) Retention rates

Crude approximation but it makes the point we want to make. Increase value by increasing these.
7/ How much of a difference can it make?

It takes 8 to 12 years to get a business to a point where it pays off for the founders. Given a choice of four different businesses which one would you pick?

a) FTC
b) Maya
c) Produce A
d) Product B
8/ (c) and (d) above are the same business. With one crucial difference.

(c) turns off customers because it delivers late with hit or miss product quality and has a terrible customer experience.

(d) is fanatical about customer service and experience.

Compare that with (a), (b)
9/ (a) has the highest price point, highest margins and a respectable LTV/CAC ratio but can only sell its product once or twice to customers.

In the long run it loses out to (d). If LTV was representative of franchise value, (d) would be 6 times more valuable than (a)
10/ It would take you the same time to build both businesses. The same time to get to an exit.

(d) would be more operationally complex because of logistic, so perhaps more headaches. Also more points of failure.

But financially speaking, which one would you rather build?
11/ They didn't teach this at business school. 20 years to pick up this lesson in real life. I wish someone sat me down and explained this 30 years ago.

Order frequency and customer shelf life matters. Pick ideas where customers buy more frequently over ideas where they buy once
12/ From @HabibUniversity Tech Management and Entrepreneurship course (MGMT 301), lecture four, unit economics for founders and building businesses that scale.

Full lecture here
https://t.co/eZGtwCLbOI

More from Economy

Interesting thread, but I don't think ecosocialists or degrowthers are arguing that if German socialists had come to power the world would be green by now. Socialism is not automatically green. Eco-socialism is what it says - a green version of socialism - to be tested /1


The historical counterfactual also in not totally convincing. So let's assume Germany and Europe went socialist. The world economy would have evolved exactly the same way it did? 🤔 I doubt it, this is too deterministic. Examples: /2

We do not know if the transition from coal to oil would have taken place when it took place, the way it did. From Timothy Mitchell we know that oil was a fix for capitalism to bypass the labour strikes of coal workers. One would think that socialists would treat workers better /3

We also do not know if socialist governments would strong arm the Middle East the way capitalists did, starting wars to secure cheap oil, and setting up puppet governments. One would want to think that Rosa Luxembourg would not go down that path..../4

We also do not know if they would have continued colonial unequal exchange, extracting raw materials as cheap as possible from the rest of the world. Without cheap oil and cheap materials, it is anyone's guess if GDP and CO2 would be where it is now. /5

You May Also Like