1. “Who Are Ireland’s Members Of The World Economic Forum Implementing The Great Reset In 2021 ? 🧵1/28
🕵️🔎 Politicians, Musicians, Clergy, Bankers, Journalists, Human Rights, Artificial Intelligence, Sustainability, Corporations & Agriculture
Leo Varadkar
Former Taoiseach, Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise and also a member of the Young Global leaders site
https://t.co/5Cq2bu04mn
Former Minister of Finance, Department of Finance of Ireland
https://t.co/y8KD9sJEhr
David McWilliams
Broadcaster, Writer and Commentator, Iconic Media Ltd and also a member of the Young Global Leaders site
https://t.co/YLRkLZ6PE6
Francesca McDonagh
Chief Executive Officer, Bank of Ireland Group
https://t.co/QLd7FonC9J
Chief Executive Officer, sub-Saharan Africa, JPMorgan Chase & Co
https://t.co/agbzP6yQU2
Eimear Farrell
Human Rights Officer
Heads Up Ireland's national Artificial Intelligence Strategy
https://t.co/QqqlooyKXx
William (Liam) Casey
Founder and Chief Executive Officer, PCH International
Interestingly, on their site https://t.co/9ek6ABLeoR there is a link to providing PPE to hospitals which is now broken
https://t.co/F8lmZIlMZE
Director-General, Development Cooperation and Africa Division, Irish Aid
https://t.co/ZVadn585Wo
Co-Founder and COO, Kinzen. Also married to Aodhán Ó Ríordáin who is an Irish Labour Party politician.
Not sure why but the link to her profile is broken 🤔
https://t.co/GCWqi2ssfk
Senior Partner and Managing Director, Boston Consulting Group.
https://t.co/YYHZ3coWWM
https://t.co/7YMwLVzDfp
Time for a bit of housekeeping. I\u2019ve collated all my\U0001f9f5and put them in one place to make them easier to find. Lots of\U0001f407\U0001f573\ufe0f to go down. Download links\U0001f447for each\U0001f9f5in a word document as well if you want to circulate. Enjoy
— Stephen Fasenfeld \U0001f600 (@fasenfeld) December 19, 2020
More from Economy
1/
Note: This report doesn’t do a dynamic analysis that makes things much clearer, but it does a thoughtful statistical analysis based upon increasingly available data.
https://t.co/5Xmt8y7lCL
A few more quotes:
2/
“The analysis also finds that lockdowns are powerful instruments to reduce infections, especially when they are introduced early in a country’s epidemic and when they are sufficiently stringent.”
3/
“lockdowns become progressively more effective in reducing COVID-19 cases when they become sufficiently stringent. Mild lockdowns appear instead ineffective at curbing infections.”
4/
“The results suggest that to achieve a given reduction in infections, policymakers may want to opt for stringent lockdowns over a shorter period rather than prolonged mild lockdowns...
5/
Surprised so many smart people bought into the idea that $600/wk UI is the same as $600/wk job guarantee (or better) or that JG jobs must be inherently inessential. I\u2019ve addressed this many times & will post a thread later. Trying not to spend precious family time on Twitter.
— Pavlina R Tcherneva (@ptcherneva) December 29, 2020
Automatic stabilization: Both $600/wk UI and JG will provide counter cyclical spending. But UI will be weaker. Counter-cyclical stabilization is not just about the absence of income. It is also about the transmission and structure of economy
Firms don't like to hire the unemployed. Mass and long-term unemployment make the problem worse. JG would recover labor markets much faster than a UI of the same amount, both b/c of the higher direct, induced & tertiary employment effects & b/c of private firm hiring preferences.
JG stabilizes spending patterns better. Uncertain job prospects may mean more cautious spending from the unemployed compared to those w/ guaranteed jobs.
UI is temporary, which makes matters worse. Even if it were permanent, it still won't resolve the problem of job scarcity.
Nations who once achieved tight full employment through active labor market policies demonstrate that unemployment does NOT fluctuate the same way it does w/o them. Direct employment, ELR type policies diminish drastically/even eliminate these amplitudes (eg postwar Japan/Sweden)
You May Also Like
If everyone was holding bitcoin on the old x86 in their parents basement, we would be finding a price bottom. The problem is the risk is all pooled at a few brokerages and a network of rotten exchanges with counter party risk that makes AIG circa 2008 look like a good credit.
— Greg Wester (@gwestr) November 25, 2018
The benign product is sovereign programmable money, which is historically a niche interest of folks with a relatively clustered set of beliefs about the state, the literary merit of Snow Crash, and the utility of gold to the modern economy.
This product has narrow appeal and, accordingly, is worth about as much as everything else on a 486 sitting in someone's basement is worth.
The other product is investment scams, which have approximately the best product market fit of anything produced by humans. In no age, in no country, in no city, at no level of sophistication do people consistently say "Actually I would prefer not to get money for nothing."
This product needs the exchanges like they need oxygen, because the value of it is directly tied to having payment rails to move real currency into the ecosystem and some jurisdictional and regulatory legerdemain to stay one step ahead of the banhammer.