#DELTACORP
Channel from 2020 bottom broken.
Can go down to 200 if 250 is broken on closing basis.
Definite exit if someone is holding from lower levels.
More from Mayank Narula
Monthly divergence may come into play.
I said best case scenario is market dump over next few months, and it's happening now.
I won't be surprised if it takes off to new all time high after flushing out new entrants.
#BITCOIN
— Mayank Narula (@Mayank_Narula1) March 5, 2022
Pending RSI divergence on monthly chart which requires a dip under 13805 to get resolved.
But monthly RSI divergences can go on for years before the resolution.
Best case scenario will be panic dump over next few months. pic.twitter.com/hi67hMg9sZ
More from Deltacorp
153 ✅
188 ✅
209 ✅
Now 225 🔥
Khelo India khelo
271 - 364 intact
delta corp - follow up and updated chart
— Vibhor Varshney (@nakulvibhor) September 2, 2021
started tracking at 153 , then gave again at 188
now 209
supportive trendline is still intact from 1.5 years
making HH-HL
making round bottom in big picture
target 271 - 364
disc - personally holding in folio https://t.co/KhOsxZEoQR pic.twitter.com/h8KFg4WfQk
Now above Fibonacci retracement
0.618%(268) and likely move higher towards next Fibonacci retracement level
0.786(327 ) and than ATH cross.
#Probability
DELTACORP
— Waves_Perception(Dinesh Patel) Stock Market FARMER (@idineshptl) August 13, 2020
116
Just a perspective pic.twitter.com/Qymzx8VfsR
You May Also Like
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?