I'm now going to ad-lib my long-threatened thread about Mission: Impossible and my single favourite sequence in motion pictures (take that, Red Shoes ballet sequence). Here's the film on the iPlayer right now. The sequence in question is the one in the thumbnail. Of course!

The sequence really begins with a choreographed bit of sitting-on-a-train, wherein Ethan Hunt gives a broad sketch of his plan. Essentially he says "We all have jobs to do" but what those jobs are is basically secret. Heist movies can go both ways. This one hangs on surprise.
The heist target is an IMF mainframe - they're going rogue and infiltrating their own agency. It's crucial to what the scene, and film, means at the most basic level. The institution is corrupt, our 'heroes' are pitted against it. Lots of the film is foggy but *this* is clear.
The remainder of the early train scene has one major purpose: to tell us the mission is impossible. This sequence delivers on the basic promise of the film (the whole series, arguably). The impossibility of the mission is exciting for the crew, compounding audience excitement.
Though this scene doesn't tell us what Hunt's solution is, it's crucial that it lays out the problem in a very clearly readable way. The vault's high security is hammered home. We're shown *and* told at the same time.
In a way, it's like being presented with all of the evidence in a murder mystery - the things we remember later when the crime is solved so the resolution is satisfying. At the same time, it's more raising of the stakes. Every locked door is another puzzle that needs solving.
Some of the problems seem like total red herrings - the key code on the door, the retinal scan - because Hunt and co. are going to bypass them entirely rather than take them head-on. But they have another use later...
What an eccentric keypad, by the way. Numbers and... well, why not just letters? As Donloe only uses the numbers maybe the symbols have another specific use. Nothing ever comes of them - maybe it's something to revisit and twist in Mission: Impossible 7 and 8.
When we first see the 'black vault' it's nothing of the sort. It's an interesting design - divergent from the description in the shooting script (the one credited to Robert Towne). Oh - and note the clock on the wall. It's 10:00 right now.
In the script, "the glass and tile walls of the room overlook computer storage towers." On the screen, the walls themselves seem to be computers. The production design feels like the room is "inside" the data, that getting in here is getting to the centre of things.
Now some rules that ARE directly important: three systems operating whenever the the technician is out of the room. Again, De Palma *shows* us what he can while we're also being told.
Cutting back to "Oh crap" reaction shots is a simple, effective bit of stakes-raising.
The room changes dramatically when the Intrusion Countermeasures are active/not active. Why? Well, it's for our good, really. The change is very plainly established during another bit of show and tell.
(You'll see the time tick over to 10:01 in the same shot, in fact - time pressure becomes a thing later on)
Now we come to the most interesting element of the whole scene. The iced tea.
That's a heck of a place to put your tea, isn't it, Mr Donloe? It's almost as if he wants it to fall on the floor. A cheeky bit of cheating to make the next bit work - showing us that the security system works and what that looks like.
The 'red for danger' colouring is pretty straightforward. I think there's a little more going on. I think this sequence adds up to a war against the body. Against the rubbishness of biology. Against human imperfection. So, the tea is organic and wet in a crisp, dry machine world.
So far, all of this has been established in a scene without score, with emphatic, 'signposting' sound effects in a tense silence. What a perfect mood to explode with the exciting Mission: Impossible theme - and what a way to say "We're off an running." Music and sirens blaring!
The first portion of the heist is the infiltration of the Langley campus, done with good ol' disguises and IMF maskcraft. We had no idea at all this was coming, but it's well-told and exciting to watch unfolding. The dialogue is as urgent and active as the camera.
We've learned all about the videofeed spy glasses earlier. Reprising them now works well in a "rule of three" sense, bolstering a crucial late sequence in the film, but they're also put to good use right now, to quickly and simply show us the alarm hack unfold.
I could single out tiny, elegant details all day. Even simple choices like the hand on the shoulder here, pre-empting/motivating the camera move, are cinematic, clear ideas.

More from Culture

Best books I read in 2020

1. Atomic Habits by @JamesClear

“If you show up at the gym 5 days in a row—even for 2 minutes—you're casting votes for your new identity. You’re not worried about getting in shape. Youre focused on becoming the type of person who doesn’t miss workouts”


Good Reasons for Bad Feelings

https://t.co/KZDqte19nG

2. “social anxiety is overwhelmingly common. Natural selection shaped us to care enormously what other people think..We constantly monitor how much others value us..Low self-esteem is a signal to try harder to please others”


The True Believer by Eric Hoffer

https://t.co/uZT4kdhzvZ

“Hatred is the most accessible and comprehensive of all unifying agents...Mass movements can rise and spread without belief in a God, but never without a believe in a devil.”


Grandstanding

https://t.co/4Of58AZUj8

"if politics becomes a morality pageant, then the contestants have an incentive to keep problems intact...politics becomes a forum to show off moral qualities...people will be dedicated to activism for its own sake, as a vehicle to preen"


Warriors and Worriers by Joyce Benenson

https://t.co/yLC4eGHEd4

“Across diverse cultures, a man who lives in the house with another man’s children is about 60 times more likely than the biological father to kill those children.”
One of the authors of the Policy Exchange report on academic free speech thinks it is "ridiculous" to expect him to accurately portray an incident at Cardiff University in his study, both in the reporting and in a question put to a student sample.


Here is the incident Kaufmann incorporated into his study, as told by a Cardiff professor who was there. As you can see, the incident involved the university intervening to *uphold* free speech principles:


Here is the first mention of the Greer at Cardiff incident in Kaufmann's report. It refers to the "concrete case" of the "no-platforming of Germaine Greer". Any reasonable reader would assume that refers to an incident of no-platforming instead of its opposite.


Here is the next mention of Greer in the report. The text asks whether the University "should have overruled protestors" and "stepped in...and guaranteed Greer the right to speak". Again the strong implication is that this did not happen and Greer was "no platformed".


The authors could easily have added a footnote at this point explaining what actually happened in Cardiff. They did not.

You May Also Like

MASTER THREAD on Short Strangles.

Curated the best tweets from the best traders who are exceptional at managing strangles.

• Positional Strangles
• Intraday Strangles
• Position Sizing
• How to do Adjustments
• Plenty of Examples
• When to avoid
• Exit Criteria

How to sell Strangles in weekly expiry as explained by boss himself. @Mitesh_Engr

• When to sell
• How to do Adjustments
• Exit


Beautiful explanation on positional option selling by @Mitesh_Engr
Sir on how to sell low premium strangles yourself without paying anyone. This is a free mini course in


1st Live example of managing a strangle by Mitesh Sir. @Mitesh_Engr

• Sold Strangles 20% cap used
• Added 20% cap more when in profit
• Booked profitable leg and rolled up
• Kept rolling up profitable leg
• Booked loss in calls
• Sold only


2nd example by @Mitesh_Engr Sir on converting a directional trade into strangles. Option Sellers can use this for consistent profit.

• Identified a reversal and sold puts

• Puts decayed a lot

• When achieved 2% profit through puts then sold