Supreme Court to hear shortly a petition filed by UPSC aspirants seeking extra chance for those candidates who had given their last attempt in October 2020.

#UPSC2020 #UPSCExams

The petitioners rely on the September 30 order of the Supreme Court which directed the Centre and UPSC to consider granting an extra chance to last attempt candidates with corresponding rise in upper age limit.

#UPSC #civilservices

Report of order :

https://t.co/B1hGnduY02
A bench comprising Justices AM Khanwilkar, BR Gavai and Krishnan Murari will take up the petition seeking extra attempt for last chance USPC aspirants in a short while.

#UPSC #civilservices #upsc2020 #upscprelims2020 #SupremeCourt
The bench has taken up the petition of UPSC aspirants for extra attempt.

#UPSC #civilservices #upsc2020 #upscprelims2020 #SupremeCourt
Issue regarding grant of extra chance for last attempt UPSC candidates is under consideration of the Central Government, Solicitor General tells the bench.

#UPSC #civilservices #upsc2020 #upscprelims2020 #SupremeCourt
Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi for the petitioners submitted that the Court has directed the centre to consider grant of extra chance considering the difficulties of COVID19 last year.
#UPSC #civilservices #upsc2020 #upscprelims2020 #SupremeCourt
"It is under active consideration of the Centre. We are not taking adversarial stand", Solicitor General.
#UPSC #civilservices #upsc2020 #upscprelims2020 #SupremeCourt
What is the time frame required for this?, Justice Khanwilkar asks.

3 or 4 weeks, Solicitor General replies.

Rohatgi requests for posting on January 6.

#UPSC #civilservices #upsc2020 #upscprelims2020 #SupremeCourt
Anushre Kapadia AOR clarifies that the petition is not confined only to last chance candidates and is covering those candidates who could not give exams due to COVID19.

#UPSC #civilservices #upsc2020 #upscprelims2020 #SupremeCourt
"We are not saying anything except list this matter on January 11", Justice Khanwilkar.

#UPSC #civilservices #upsc2020 #upscprelims2020 #SupremeCourt

More from Live Law

More from Court

You May Also Like

"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."


We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.

Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)

It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.

Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".