#Areaofvalue analysis
#CDSL
Buy near 21 SMA support. This stock respects 21 SMA for 84% time. Backtested for last 1 year.
Candle size is getting smaller and volume also less then avg volume.
Any time it can reverse from here.
Help/Support
https://t.co/rRCfjf3KIi
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E0uTTnUVIAMButk.png)
More from SSStockAlerts
Dear Friends,
#sssnewfeature
We have implemented sector chart analysis feature and it is available from Scans, Positional and Analysis pages.
Power is given to you. Step ahead with your analysis with leading sectors analysis https://t.co/7rQ5UjCd2J
- 52 weeks high breakout stocks analysis
- You can see them in tabular format as well and get list of stocks for each sector also.
- Enhanced filter to support these sectors, so you can apply these sectors in filter also.
#sssnewfeature
We have implemented sector chart analysis feature and it is available from Scans, Positional and Analysis pages.
Power is given to you. Step ahead with your analysis with leading sectors analysis https://t.co/7rQ5UjCd2J
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E1xnUkpUcAA4fON.jpg)
Dear Friends,
— SSStockAlerts (@ssstockalerts) May 19, 2021
A Sector analysis for scans feature will be added to site.
Eg:- See analysis for 52weeks high breakout, from text tile sector has more breakouts, so concentrate on Textile sector pic.twitter.com/U0cIoEeKDy
- 52 weeks high breakout stocks analysis
- You can see them in tabular format as well and get list of stocks for each sector also.
- Enhanced filter to support these sectors, so you can apply these sectors in filter also.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E1xnjDLVUAI6O6c.png)
Dear Friends,
#Sssnewfeature
We have implemented the Price range scans to identify which are in the tight price range for the last few days. Use these scans along with the other scans like the Mark Minervini pattern(High momentum).
@krishchess @Techtrades365
1/n
- These scans can help to find out the stocks whose range is < 5% or 7%.
1. 3 candles price range below 7%
2. 5 candles price range below 7%
3. 10 candles price range below 7%
4. 3 candles price range below 5%
5. 5 candles price range below 5%
6. 10 candles price range below 5%
Why range is important?
When you enter into a trade, for setting up a stop loss if we get the stocks within the 7% price range then we can keep our sl with less than 7%.
- As per Mark Minervini, don't keep the SL with more than 8%.
https://t.co/RkaOwvfBaq
Scans => price range
#Sssnewfeature
We have implemented the Price range scans to identify which are in the tight price range for the last few days. Use these scans along with the other scans like the Mark Minervini pattern(High momentum).
@krishchess @Techtrades365
1/n
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FQe1xYWVQAEurN2.png)
- These scans can help to find out the stocks whose range is < 5% or 7%.
1. 3 candles price range below 7%
2. 5 candles price range below 7%
3. 10 candles price range below 7%
4. 3 candles price range below 5%
5. 5 candles price range below 5%
6. 10 candles price range below 5%
Why range is important?
When you enter into a trade, for setting up a stop loss if we get the stocks within the 7% price range then we can keep our sl with less than 7%.
- As per Mark Minervini, don't keep the SL with more than 8%.
https://t.co/RkaOwvfBaq
Scans => price range
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FQe2dwnVEAMUwgM.png)
#CDSL
- Stock rallied to 986 from 789(25%) in just 23days.
- Able to catch the momentum stock near its area of value.
- Find out the stocks which respect which moving average using our AOV analysis and know this type of stocks earlier before bigger move.
- Stock rallied to 986 from 789(25%) in just 23days.
- Able to catch the momentum stock near its area of value.
- Find out the stocks which respect which moving average using our AOV analysis and know this type of stocks earlier before bigger move.
#Areaofvalue analysis#CDSL
— SSStockAlerts (@ssstockalerts) May 6, 2021
Buy near 21 SMA support. This stock respects 21 SMA for 84% time. Backtested for last 1 year.
Candle size is getting smaller and volume also less then avg volume.
Any time it can reverse from here.
Help/Supporthttps://t.co/rRCfjf3KIi pic.twitter.com/KGyyAAQ1tV
More from Cdsl
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x