This statement is thought provoking. Except those having hatred towards Hinduism, every individual endowed with positive vision, accepts this truth.
Agree or Disagree - This Country is Hindu Country
During an informal discussion some time back in St. Louis USA, a researcher of medical sciences said, ‘After attaining independence, couple of leaders left Hindus without their own country’.
This statement is thought provoking. Except those having hatred towards Hinduism, every individual endowed with positive vision, accepts this truth.
All the people in this country were declared as Hindus. Even to this day, some remember the slogan ‘Hindustan Hamara’ i.e. Hindustan belongs to all of us.
But, foreigners mentioned it as India. Some prominent leaders of the day confirmed the same.
After the ruthless partition of this country purely based on religion into two other Muslim countries, then..
Hindu religion did not come into existence based on books or preachers. This word is completely national. Dharma, Knowledge,..
The Hindu Dharma that existed even before them belonged to this country. Doctrine of these three have always been that their religion and party ideology are the only refuge..
Hence, they have been making very serious attempts in the direction of converting this country into theirs, while all the time hating & creating violence against those opposing..
Their strong trust is , ‘Entire culture of Bhaarata is Hindu religion’. In fact, their opinion is not far from truth.
What is the country for Hindu religion?
All the leaders are kindly requested to answer this question.
Which country has the roots for this religion?
Malayachala, Ganga, Yamuna, Godavari, Krishna,
Kaveri, Tungabhadra, Tamraparni, Mahaanadi,
Ayodhya, Madhura, Maya, Kashi, Puri,
Dwaraka, Venkatachala, Arunachala,
Kanyakumari, that country which is the
motherland of faith centers of all Hindus..
If every one of us ask to provide a country of our own…what will be given?
It goes without saying that such land where our religious texts, beliefs exist, that land should be given. That means ‘Bhaarata’ should be given.
country shall be preserved.
In 1896 itself when Bharat was under foreign rule, Swami Vivekananda emphasized..
This is just the expression of truth. Every country in the world that respects Hindu Dharma reminisces only about Bharat but not any other country, whenever they think about Hindu religion.
In places where those two religions that advocate to kill or call them sinners those who are not following their religion,..
and fear as minorities, is hidden? Because of this unjust method, approximately in 7 states, Hindus quickly
became a minority.
integrity or destroying the civilization of this country. (Kerala, Northeastern states, Kashmir, West Bengal are
striking examples)
More from Brahmasri Samavedam Shanmukha Sarma
You May Also Like
fascinated by this man, mario cortellucci, and his outsized influence on ontario and GTA politics. cortellucci, who lives in vaughan and ran as a far-right candidate for the italian senate back in 2018 - is a major ford donor...
his name might sound familiar because the new cortellucci vaughan hospital at mackenzie health, the one doug ford has been touting lately as a covid-centric facility, is named after him and his family
but his name also pops up in a LOT of other ford projects. for instance - he controls the long term lease on big parts of toronto's portlands... where doug ford once proposed building an nfl stadium and monorail... https://t.co/weOMJ51bVF
cortellucci, who is a developer, also owns a large chunk of the greenbelt. doug ford's desire to develop the greenbelt has been
and late last year he rolled back the mandate of conservation authorities there, prompting the resignations of several members of the greenbelt advisory
his name might sound familiar because the new cortellucci vaughan hospital at mackenzie health, the one doug ford has been touting lately as a covid-centric facility, is named after him and his family
but his name also pops up in a LOT of other ford projects. for instance - he controls the long term lease on big parts of toronto's portlands... where doug ford once proposed building an nfl stadium and monorail... https://t.co/weOMJ51bVF
cortellucci, who is a developer, also owns a large chunk of the greenbelt. doug ford's desire to develop the greenbelt has been
and late last year he rolled back the mandate of conservation authorities there, prompting the resignations of several members of the greenbelt advisory
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".