Exactly 1 year ago, I wrote my first post on LinkedIn.

It blew up.

A few months later, I figured Twitter out.

Now I have 51k followers across both platforms + massive credibility + a profitable side hustle.

All I did was follow these 4 writing principles:

1. Write an attention-grabbing hook
2. Prioritize structure
3. Make it about your audience
4. Deliver on your promises

Let's get specific ↓
1. Write an attention-grabbing hook

People want to know:

-Why should I read this?
-How will it help me?
-What will I learn?

To answer those Qs:

-Poke at pain points to light up emotions
-Add credibility to build trust
-Build intrigue to pique interest
-Leave a cliffhanger
There's a difference between shitty and valuable hooks.

Shitty hooks are regurgitated and soulless.

Or, they're clickbait (designed to capture attention but have zero value).

Here's how to write valuable & differentiated hooks instead:

https://t.co/xFus07265S
2. Prioritize structure

The best writing, presented in the wrong order, won't move the needle.

Your narrative arc needs to match your format, e.g.:

-Storytelling
-Listicles
-How to

Here's a snapshot of a "How to" vs. a "Lessons" listicle:

cc @KateBour
Beyond the content format as a whole, you also need to strategically structure your hooks/individual tweets/paragraphs.

There are several formulas and frameworks out there.

Here's the one I use most often:

SCQA ↓
1. Situation (summary)
2. Complication (problem)
3. Question (transition)
4. Answer (solution)

E.g.

-Clickbait posts attract followers
-But disinterested audiences rarely buy
-The key to valuable growth that converts?
-Content that resonates & builds authority
The above example could work as a hook or in the body part of your post.

Here's my favorite example of this format in a hook:

cc: @amandanat
3. Make it about your audience

People want to learn, grow, overcome problems, & reach goals.

You can talk about yourself but in the context of helping others.

Posts that are specific, direct, and outcome-driven perform much better than generalized, self-serving shares.

E.g.↓
Self-centered:

"My business is killing it. I've created amazing processes. Here's my story."

Audience-centered:

"I've built my business to $X MRR in 2 years. How? Documented processes from day 1 so I could delegate & focus on sales. Here are 7 lessons to scale efficiently."
The 2nd example does these things well:

-Adds quantifiable proof ($X MRR in 2 years)
-Gets specific with outcomes (delegate to save time + focus on sales)
-Tells the reader exactly what they'll learn (scale efficiently)

This builds trust and intrigue, which leads to clicks.
4. Deliver on your promises

You want readers to:

-Feel like they're learning
-Experience zero friction
-Stay interested throughout

To do that:

-Share unique insights
-Add the "why" and "how"
-Show, don't just tell

This helps them...
-Visualize the concepts you’re explaining
-Extract takeaways they can act on
-Reach “aha!” moments
-Get past objections
-Stay entertained

Consider:

-Why does this matter to my audience?
-How can the reader act on this?
-Can I back this up with data?
-What's the impact of this?
All of this said, writing advice means nothing if you don't:

-Know who you are
-Know who your audience is

This is not a one-and-done exercise.

Both you and your audience will continuously evolve.

Pay attention to those changes and shift your strategy accordingly.
I hope this helps you create more impactful social posts!

Follow me @ericasmyname for more.

And comment and retweet as you please :)

For easy sharing: https://t.co/2hATQoGeU9

More from All

@franciscodeasis https://t.co/OuQaBRFPu7
Unfortunately the "This work includes the identification of viral sequences in bat samples, and has resulted in the isolation of three bat SARS-related coronaviruses that are now used as reagents to test therapeutics and vaccines." were BEFORE the


chimeric infectious clone grants were there.https://t.co/DAArwFkz6v is in 2017, Rs4231.
https://t.co/UgXygDjYbW is in 2016, RsSHC014 and RsWIV16.
https://t.co/krO69CsJ94 is in 2013, RsWIV1. notice that this is before the beginning of the project

starting in 2016. Also remember that they told about only 3 isolates/live viruses. RsSHC014 is a live infectious clone that is just as alive as those other "Isolates".

P.D. somehow is able to use funds that he have yet recieved yet, and send results and sequences from late 2019 back in time into 2015,2013 and 2016!

https://t.co/4wC7k1Lh54 Ref 3: Why ALL your pangolin samples were PCR negative? to avoid deep sequencing and accidentally reveal Paguma Larvata and Oryctolagus Cuniculus?

You May Also Like

Funny, before the election I recall lefties muttering the caravan must have been a Trump setup because it made the open borders crowd look so bad. Why would the pro-migrant crowd engineer a crisis that played into Trump's hands? THIS is why. THESE are the "optics" they wanted.


This media manipulation effort was inspired by the success of the "kids in cages" freakout, a 100% Stalinist propaganda drive that required people to forget about Obama putting migrant children in cells. It worked, so now they want pics of Trump "gassing children on the border."

There's a heavy air of Pallywood around the whole thing as well. If the Palestinians can stage huge theatrical performances of victimhood with the willing cooperation of Western media, why shouldn't the migrant caravan organizers expect the same?

It's business as usual for Anarchy, Inc. - the worldwide shredding of national sovereignty to increase the power of transnational organizations and left-wing ideology. Many in the media are true believers. Others just cannot resist the narrative of "change" and "social justice."

The product sold by Anarchy, Inc. is victimhood. It always boils down to the same formula: once the existing order can be painted as oppressors and children as their victims, chaos wins and order loses. Look at the lefties shrieking in unison about "Trump gassing children" today.