๐ธ Link:
https://t.co/zG165Xa3JB
๐ธ Click on the above link -> Add to Favourites -> Add on Chart from favourites and start using it !
2/20
๐ฑ ๐ง๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ป๐ด๐๐ถ๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ป๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฎ๐น๐น ๐ง๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐๐ต๐ผ๐๐น๐ฑ ๐ธ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ผ๐๐:
๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฎ
๐งต Thread ๐งต
Retweet And I will Link a 36 Page PDF
๐ธ Link:
https://t.co/zG165Xa3JB
๐ธ Click on the above link -> Add to Favourites -> Add on Chart from favourites and start using it !
2/20
๐ธ Cashflows
๐ธ Income Statements
๐ธ Balance sheets
๐ธ PE,PB ratios
๐ธ Marketcapitlization
๐ธ Statistics
3/20
๐ธ There are 8 columns you can basically select any financial you want
๐ธ You can select quarterly or Yearly values and can also write
๐ธ The names of the financiaLS Example : EPS Qtr3
๐ธ You can Change colours , font size
4/20
You cannot track each and every indicator like ( ๐ ๐ผ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐๐ด๐ , ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ , ๐ ๐๐๐ ) etc , you can use plot this custom strategy to understand whether the trend is positive or negative of those indicators
5/20
๐ธ Click on the above link -> Add to Favourites -> Add on Chart from favourites and start using it !
6/20
๐ธ You can change the weightage of the indicators like 50-50 for MAs and Oscillator or 70-30
๐ธ You can select different TF from chart to do MTF analysis
๐ธ Change the colour of bullish and bearish signals
7/20
๐ธ You want to calculate the returns of stock say over 10 Years how much CAGR returns it has given , this is the indicator
๐ธ https://t.co/i92ISnJPZi
๐ธ Just select 2 time periods and it will automatically calculate the CAGR .
8/20
๐ธ Select 2 points you want to calculate CAGR and if you wish to compare it with any asset then can use
๐ธ Compare to โ and select the symbol like nifty , Gold or Nasdaq
9/20
๐ธ Tired of people copying or stealing your charts
๐ธ Use this watermark indicator where you can add your names or brand name anywhere in your chart
10/20
๐ธ https://t.co/ZPVKnUWcgn
๐ธ Click on the above link -> Add to Favourites -> Add on Chart from favourites and start using it !
๐ธ Increase Decrease the size of texts , change colours , change the positions
11/20
๐ธ https://t.co/ZPVKnUWcgn
๐ธ Click on the above link -> Add to Favourites -> Add on Chart from favourites and start using it !
๐ธ Increase Decrease the size of texts , change colours , change the positions
11/20
What Is RSI Divergence?
๐ธ With RSI divergence, ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ฎ ๐๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ณ๐ถ๐ฐ ๐๐๐ผ๐ฐ๐ธ ๐๐ต๐ผ๐๐ ๐น๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ต๐ถ๐ด๐ต๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ป ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐๐ฝ๐๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ต๐ถ๐๐ ๐ต๐ถ๐ด๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ต๐ถ๐ด๐ต๐
15/20
18/20
7 less known Tradingview Indicators that all traders should know about
— JayneshKasliwal (@JayneshKasliwal) June 2, 2022
A thread\U0001f9f5
I have designed many beginner to advanced
— JayneshKasliwal (@JayneshKasliwal) September 24, 2022
Option Strategies free of cost
Here is a thread of all \U0001f9f5
A Retweet would help :)
More from JayneshKasliwal
More from All
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
