As an agency owner, it's important to set clear expectations and guidelines from day one of a client relationship
Here's the contract we use to do that
*thread*
This is an important precedent to set, because the client-agency relationship requires input from both sides in order to be successful.
We keep this brief and save the details for our onboarding call.
Of course, we get paid for each call we book for the client and charge a setup fee to take care of the initial expenses needed to get campaigns started.
Unless you're dealing with a bad client, you should never run into an issue with interest... 7 days is more than enough time to pay an invoice.
This amendment sets clear expectations on the quality of booked calls.
We still need to be paid for every call booked, or else we'd have to charge a lot more than $300 per call.
Here's a thread on how to setup a client feedback loop for the quality of calls booked 👇
https://t.co/H9514Wcbxa
how to create & automate a client feedback loop to get real-time insights from clients on the quality of booked calls
— andre \u26a1\ufe0f (@andrehaykaljr) June 30, 2021
**thread** pic.twitter.com/K8rv3KOyjc
Something to note here is the 90 day commitment, which gives us plenty of time to optimize campaigns without the risk of the agreement being ended.
This 14 day window lets us wind down campaigns and take advantage of any conversations that may still lead to booked calls.
Needs to be clear that you as the agency are in charge of the work, not the client.
They protect your time and effort, give the client more clarity on the relationship, and establish clear responsibilities for both sides to get started working together.
And as always be sure to follow me for more actionable threads just like this one @andrehaykaljr :)
More from All
You May Also Like
Ivor Cummins has been wrong (or lying) almost entirely throughout this pandemic and got paid handsomly for it.
He has been wrong (or lying) so often that it will be nearly impossible for me to track every grift, lie, deceit, manipulation he has pulled. I will use...
... other sources who have been trying to shine on light on this grifter (as I have tried to do, time and again:
Example #1: "Still not seeing Sweden signal versus Denmark really"... There it was (Images attached).
19 to 80 is an over 300% difference.
Tweet: https://t.co/36FnYnsRT9
Example #2 - "Yes, I'm comparing the Noridcs / No, you cannot compare the Nordics."
I wonder why...
Tweets: https://t.co/XLfoX4rpck / https://t.co/vjE1ctLU5x
Example #3 - "I'm only looking at what makes the data fit in my favour" a.k.a moving the goalposts.
Tweets: https://t.co/vcDpTu3qyj / https://t.co/CA3N6hC2Lq
He has been wrong (or lying) so often that it will be nearly impossible for me to track every grift, lie, deceit, manipulation he has pulled. I will use...
... other sources who have been trying to shine on light on this grifter (as I have tried to do, time and again:
Ivor Cummins BE (Chem) is a former R&D Manager at HP (sourcre: https://t.co/Wbf5scf7gn), turned Content Creator/Podcast Host/YouTube personality. (Call it what you will.)
— Steve (@braidedmanga) November 17, 2020
Example #1: "Still not seeing Sweden signal versus Denmark really"... There it was (Images attached).
19 to 80 is an over 300% difference.
Tweet: https://t.co/36FnYnsRT9
Example #2 - "Yes, I'm comparing the Noridcs / No, you cannot compare the Nordics."
I wonder why...
Tweets: https://t.co/XLfoX4rpck / https://t.co/vjE1ctLU5x
Example #3 - "I'm only looking at what makes the data fit in my favour" a.k.a moving the goalposts.
Tweets: https://t.co/vcDpTu3qyj / https://t.co/CA3N6hC2Lq