Rig Ved 1.43.8

Here it says that there are two types of people who can cause harm to your yagya. One are the misers who although have everything, but they will not help you. The others can cause you harm by taking away the things accumulated for yagya.

1/7

But when we think spiritually actually miser means the bad sanskaar accumulated in us wherein we believe that we are poor and low, when actually we are not. When the cover on our eyes is taken away we have the true realization that we are absolute. In Jagrit we are at

2/7
oneness with this world, in swapna and TEJAS we are at oneness with Prakash, in SUSHUPTI and TURIYA we are in oneness with antaryami. So this realization is necessary.

मा नः॑ सोमपरि॒बाधो॒ मारा॑तयो जुहुरंत ।

आ न॑ इंदो॒ वाजे॑ भज ॥

3/7
Translation:

सोमपरिबाधः - Creating problems in Som yagya.

नः - We.

मा - No.

जुहुरन्त - Violent.

अरातयः - Enemy.

इन्दो - Oh Som!

वाजे - Strength/good grains.

आ भजः - Give from all aspects.

Explanation; We request you to protect us from the enemies who

4/7
want to create difficulties in Somyagya. We request you to protect us from misers and evil people. Oh Somdev! You also increase our strength.

Deep meaning:-Here it says that there are two types of people who can cause harm to your yagya. One are the misers who although

5/7
have everything,but they will not help you. The others can cause u harm by taking away the things accumulated for yagya. But when we think spiritually actually miser means the bad sanskaar accumulated in us wherein we believe that we are poor & low, when actually we are not.

6/7
When the cover on ur eyes is taken away we have the true realization that we are absolute. In Jagrit we are at oneness with this world,in SWAPNA & TEJAS we are at oneness with Prakash,in SUSHUPTI and TURIYA we are in oneness with antaryami. So this realization is necessary.

7/7
#हिन्दी and #मराठी translation 👇
https://t.co/joBAU3KCL0

Facebook page link👇
https://t.co/Y6ziyIZnS4

Instagram link👇
https://t.co/WF8bFXrqTw

#RigVedPositivity

#InspiredByAnjaninandanDass

📸 Credit - Rajesh N Sir
Just in case if you have not subscribed to my youtube channel, please do subscribe, I have already posted 6 Videos till now on different subjects, Specially Mythbusters topics. Do watch them and give your feedback in comments section.

https://t.co/W2jnWlziJC

More from Anshul Pandey

More from All

You May Also Like

A brief analysis and comparison of the CSS for Twitter's PWA vs Twitter's legacy desktop website. The difference is dramatic and I'll touch on some reasons why.

Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.

6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices

https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x


PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.

735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices

https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ


The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.

The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.