7 days 30 days All time Recent Popular
Today's Twitter threads (a Twitter thread).

Inside: Amazon warehouse union gets tech solidarity; and more!

Archived at: https://t.co/KYnbqjE9Ws

#Pluralistic

1/


Amazon warehouse union gets tech solidarity: #DoItWithRealPower

https://t.co/cby43y3aaU

2/


#15yrsago Mysterious birthday ritual at Poe’s graveside disrupted by rubberneckers https://t.co/16m4DbuG1h

#15yrsago Nutjob offers $100 bounty to UCLA students who wiretap lefty profs https://t.co/47JtauT8Vy

3/


#5yrsago Transreal Cyberpunk! Rudy Rucker and Bruce Sterling’s book of annotated, seminal cyberpunk fiction https://t.co/MTANIei5nB

4/


#5yrsago The Democratic Party’s SOPA-loving, Snowden-hating, Hillary-partisan power-broker has her first-ever primary challenger https://t.co/olMdn1u9Ey

#5yrsago Griefer hacks baby monitor, terrifies toddler with spooky voices https://t.co/m5VspAuXXa

5/
After thinking on it over the weekend, I have a couple of thoughts about this panel (both a bit negative + a tad contrarian it seems, though maybe just among the 6 panelists):


1. A constant refrain I hear from public opinion researchers is that the public wants (& practitioners should focus on) public opinion polling on policy & political 'issues', not election / candidate polling

The argument is reminiscent of anti-fast food dietary rhetoric. People should / do want issue polls because this is the 'healthy' way to engage in public opinion as opposed to the "guilty pleasure" of election polling

I think people are drawn to election polling because who ends up being an elected official is insanely consequential to the lives of many Americans. Political leaders also help "determine" the ideological focus of our politics, especially among co-partisans

It makes sense that researchers love "issue polling". We are really deeply interested in politics and what the public thinks and it's repercussions on politics. It also adds important extra dimensions to our work, especially when elections aren't ongoing.