Mollyycolllinss Categories Business
3 Lords, one Sir, and 12 men who, combined, have had major govt. or Tory jobs. In total, they’ve donated at least £7.3m to the Conservatives, and won 37 Covid19 contracts worth £2.1bn. @allthecitizens presents: GREEDS UNITED

Over £2.1bn has been awarded to friends and donors of the Tory party since the start of this pandemic. Of some £15bn worth of Covid contracts reviewed by @allthecitizens at least 15% have gone to Tory advisors/donors/MPs/personal connections… KICK OFF!

The Manager is Lord Ashcroft. A £350m contract to “support medical & clinical services" was scored by Medacs Healthcare, whose parent company, Impellam, is owned by Conservative grandee. Through companies etc. he’s donated £5.8m to the party. NO LIMIT! https://t.co/Twb5gJ5BYL

Last night @allthecitizens found a 1/3rd billion gov contract won by a company linked to Conservative donor Lord Ashcroft.
— The Citizens (@allthecitizens) January 20, 2021
\xa3350m Covid19 award goes to company run by Impellam, where former Tory treasurer has \u2018significant interest\u2019. THREAD: pic.twitter.com/eXZxIJJpFM
Next is David Meller. Meller Designs netted £154.7m from 7 PPE deals ranging from hanitiser to face masks via the rapid procurement process. The company’s owned by David Meller, who’s donated almost £60,000 to the Conservative party since 2009. YES! https://t.co/XZdyJLtay7

Haraldur Agustsson. Globus Shetland and Alpha Solway, companies run by Conservative Leaders’ Group member Agustsson, won £104m in PPE supply deals. Globus Shetland contract was more than the company's total turnover for previous 2 years. FOUL!
https://t.co/I0Txtqd4M3

We have spent months looking at UK gov Covid 19 contracts, and wondered if major Tory Donors are winning any? What of Alpha Solway - does it have links to a Conservative party donor club? It won 6 PPE contracts worth nearly \xa311 million: pic.twitter.com/QswaRUwXLc
— The Citizens (@allthecitizens) October 23, 2020
A thread in which I prove (using ONLY published Pfizer trial data) that the UK CMOs and JCVI have not so much ignored the science, as left it bleeding at the roadside.
Intrigued?
Read
The trial data said that after a single dose of the Pfizer vaccine coverage was 52%. Six days after the second dose that rose to nearly 91%. The new policy to delay 2nd dose is based on the idea that the 91% was in fact due to the first dose. We must hope that is true.
— Krishnan Guru-Murthy (@krishgm) December 30, 2020
From the moment, the decision was announced to delay 2nd vaccine doses, I've felt uneasy.
This is not my field of expertise, but I trained as a scientist (two chemistry degrees), worked professionally in IT, and understand the importance of testing.
My principal concern was about the Pfizer vaccine.
As vaccines go, it's "new tech", the first mRNA vaccine and the results are stunning.
Perhaps one should be cautious about deviating from a clinical trial procedure, at least until there is greater experience of mRNA vaccines?
I've been investigating this for over a week and haven't been able to sleep properly since I started.
At best, the 12 weeks strategy was based on one critical assumption, namely that the 2nd dose has NO effect on efficacy in the first 7 days after it is given.
And if it did?
My journey started with a friend pointing me towards an article in @bmj_latest which indicated that a single dose of @pfizer vaccine had an efficacy of
What is the future of public opinion polling? Register for tomorrow\u2019s live panel of #polling, #media, and #surveyresearch experts as they discuss what we can and should expect from #publicopinionpolls. https://t.co/6YHlSinIez @pete_enns @doug_rivers @jennagiesta @pollcat pic.twitter.com/Ucq9rSsFkX
— Roper Center (@RoperCenter) January 20, 2021
1. A constant refrain I hear from public opinion researchers is that the public wants (& practitioners should focus on) public opinion polling on policy & political 'issues', not election / candidate polling
The argument is reminiscent of anti-fast food dietary rhetoric. People should / do want issue polls because this is the 'healthy' way to engage in public opinion as opposed to the "guilty pleasure" of election polling
I think people are drawn to election polling because who ends up being an elected official is insanely consequential to the lives of many Americans. Political leaders also help "determine" the ideological focus of our politics, especially among co-partisans
It makes sense that researchers love "issue polling". We are really deeply interested in politics and what the public thinks and it's repercussions on politics. It also adds important extra dimensions to our work, especially when elections aren't ongoing.
Below are 12 Tweets of his BEST tweets, I found them to be extremely accurate.
You can learn in 1 Thread what took me 11 years to learn (in sales as well as in business)
THREAD:
1/12
Your network isn't far off from your net
Build relationships with:
— Sales Notepad \U0001f4d2 (@SalesNotepad) September 26, 2020
- Lawyers
- Tax advisors
- Accountants
- Sales Consultants
- Marketing Experts
- Graphic Designers
- Fitness/Mental Health Coaches
Your contacts are the real "money".
Network your way to success.
2/12
The more you give, the more you
Be generous with money, it somehow comes back to you.
— Sales Notepad \U0001f4d2 (@SalesNotepad) January 2, 2021
3/12
Don't be like the
Why most don\u2019t succeed:
— Sales Notepad \U0001f4d2 (@SalesNotepad) January 7, 2021
1. They start
2. They see progress
3. They slow down
4. They start comparing
5. They lose motivation
6. Game over
Play your own game to win.
4/12
Think about the future, the long term, never short
Banks don't like Bitcoin.
— Sales Notepad \U0001f4d2 (@SalesNotepad) January 17, 2021
Taxis don't like Uber.
Hotels don't like AirBnB.
Bookstores don't like Amazon.
Cinemas don't like Netflix.
9-5\u2019s don\u2019t like remote work.
Innovation is not always liked.