After 5126 failed prototypes over 5 years, any inventor would have given up

But Sir James Dyson stayed put and

- Invented a product which completely transformed the market
- Set up a company with 7 billion $ revenues
- Became the richest man in UK

A thread on Dyson 🧵

1/

1970s - James Dyson was a UK born industrial designer. He was fed up using the traditional vaccum cleaner with disposable bag which would stop working because of dust clogging

He tried using a cyclone based system which would extract the dust without clogging

2/
He even constructed a small prototype & connected it with the traditional vaccum cleaner with bag removed. It seemed to work decently

He presented the concept to many. But most of them rejected saying if the idea was so great, big companies would already have thought of it

3/
1979 - But Dyson didn't give up. He was able to raise an initial investment from another inventor friend and via some loan from the bank

He started developing the cyclonic vaccum system in the shed behind his house.

4/
Between 1979 and 1984, Dyson developed 5126 prototypes before getting the right one without a bag finalized

He tried licensing this invention to the companies in UK and US who can manufacture and sell the product. And give Dyson some royalties on sales

5/
The manufacturing companies turned Dyson down because it would mean an end to the vaccum bag market which was around 500 million $ back then

And thus manufacturing Dyson's vaccum cleaners meant loss of recurring revenues

6/
1984- Only 1 company agreed to work with Dyson. Rotork agreed to manufacture and sell the first version of Dyson's design.

But it sold only 500 units in the first year. Hence they decided to drop the product

7/
1985 - A Japanese company, Apex Ltd agreed to license the product and launched it in Japan under the name G-Force for 2000$

It became a big hit in Japan and won the International design fair prize in 1991

8/
1991 - Using the licensing fees from sales in Japan, Dyson decided to set up Dyson Appliances Ltd. He started manufacturing the DC 01 version of the product from a facility in Wiltshire

9/
Dyson started advertising DC 01 with the tagline say goodbye to the bag. With a clear benefit of saving on dust bags, the sales took off

https://t.co/VY0gxWVqum

10/
Dyson was particularly known for its unique design, known as the Apple of Appliances

It took design decisions which were against findings of market research. Eg: DC 01 retained transparent container for dust despite of market research suggesting otherwise.

11/
But the transparent dust container became a very popular feature of DC 01 after launch as it showed the effectiveness of the product to the consumer instantly

2001 - Company had expanded to US and other European nations. DC 01 had captured close to 47% market share in UK

12/
2004- company started entering Asian markets like China, Singapore and Malaysia

2005 - Became the No 1 selling vaccum cleaner in US by value

13/
Today Dyson sells vaccum cleaners, hand dryers, LED lamps, hair dryers and multiple other electronic appliances in around 65 countries. And generates close to 7.5 billion$ in revenues

14/
Also known as the Apple of appliances, Dyson has made Sir James Dyson the richest man in UK with a networth of 16.2 billion $

If he would not have continued after 5126 attempts, Dyson would not have come into existence

15/15

More from Business

This is a GREAT argument to pull up when talking to people about minimum wage. Some others nested below


A large number of new jobs being created are minimum to low wage, so looking for a new job generally won’t increase pay.

Raising minimum wage helps things not directly related.

Helps Infant mortality? Yup.

Lowers Suicide? Yup.

Reduce smoking rates? You bet.

It also boosts the local economy! Minimum to low wage earners spend more % of their money, so an increase means more is spent, often in community!

Low paying jobs are often in sectors which would gain from this. More people spending money in your shop makes your business more money! Now you have more profits and increased labor costs are covered.

You May Also Like

And here they are...

THE WINNERS OF THE 24 HOUR STARTUP CHALLENGE

Remember, this money is just fun. If you launched a product (or even attempted a launch) - you did something worth MUCH more than $1,000.

#24hrstartup

The winners 👇

#10

Lattes For Change - Skip a latte and save a life.

https://t.co/M75RAirZzs

@frantzfries built a platform where you can see how skipping your morning latte could do for the world.

A great product for a great cause.

Congrats Chris on winning $250!


#9

Instaland - Create amazing landing pages for your followers.

https://t.co/5KkveJTAsy

A team project! @bpmct and @BaileyPumfleet built a tool for social media influencers to create simple "swipe up" landing pages for followers.

Really impressive for 24 hours. Congrats!


#8

SayHenlo - Chat without distractions

https://t.co/og0B7gmkW6

Built by @DaltonEdwards, it's a platform for combatting conversation overload. This product was also coded exclusively from an iPad 😲

Dalton is a beast. I'm so excited he placed in the top 10.


#7

CoderStory - Learn to code from developers across the globe!

https://t.co/86Ay6nF4AY

Built by @jesswallaceuk, the project is focused on highlighting the experience of developers and people learning to code.

I wish this existed when I learned to code! Congrats on $250!!
I’m torn on how to approach the idea of luck. I’m the first to admit that I am one of the luckiest people on the planet. To be born into a prosperous American family in 1960 with smart parents is to start life on third base. The odds against my very existence are astronomical.


I’ve always felt that the luckiest people I know had a talent for recognizing circumstances, not of their own making, that were conducive to a favorable outcome and their ability to quickly take advantage of them.

In other words, dumb luck was just that, it required no awareness on the person’s part, whereas “smart” luck involved awareness followed by action before the circumstances changed.

So, was I “lucky” to be born when I was—nothing I had any control over—and that I came of age just as huge databases and computers were advancing to the point where I could use those tools to write “What Works on Wall Street?” Absolutely.

Was I lucky to start my stock market investments near the peak of interest rates which allowed me to spend the majority of my adult life in a falling rate environment? Yup.