Alex1Powell Categories Trading
7 days
30 days
All time
Recent
Popular
I was still in high school in 2000, so obviously wasn't investing.
But the more I read, the more I realize it wasn't just a using "eyeballs" for valuation problem.
Thread below:
First up Xilinx
They were the leaders (and still are) with ~40% share in FPGAs. The end market was growing. They were growing fast as shown in this chart for fiscal year 2001 ending in March 2001
The CAGR was lot higher in closer to 2000 - it was growing 50%+. Until 2001 that is. That's when revenues dropped 30% due to market correction.
Xilinx - an innovator and leader in FPGAs - did not reach same stock price until 2018!
Next up - Microsoft
It was growing fast, Bill Gates was talking of PC plus era where internet would enable new features
But MSFT got multiple compression problem as covered in this excellent tweet from @corry_wang
Stock price to dropped from the highs of late 1999 and didn't get back till 2016, despite quadrupling earnings in the next
But the more I read, the more I realize it wasn't just a using "eyeballs" for valuation problem.
Thread below:
First up Xilinx
They were the leaders (and still are) with ~40% share in FPGAs. The end market was growing. They were growing fast as shown in this chart for fiscal year 2001 ending in March 2001
The CAGR was lot higher in closer to 2000 - it was growing 50%+. Until 2001 that is. That's when revenues dropped 30% due to market correction.
Xilinx - an innovator and leader in FPGAs - did not reach same stock price until 2018!
Next up - Microsoft
It was growing fast, Bill Gates was talking of PC plus era where internet would enable new features
But MSFT got multiple compression problem as covered in this excellent tweet from @corry_wang
Stock price to dropped from the highs of late 1999 and didn't get back till 2016, despite quadrupling earnings in the next
12/ "The multiple matters just as much as the growth"
— Corry Wang (@corry_wang) September 1, 2020
Sorry guys, I couldn't resist fitting at least one truly hot take in here... pic.twitter.com/NuT7dIeRBd
If you are someone who spends more time on analyzing markets during trading, then this for you. Certain traders will create their own bullish or bearish view in their mind but seek confirmation for their trades which is called as confirmation bias. #tradingpsychology 1/15
We do not like people or information that contradicts our thoughts. We like them when they confirm what we think. Hence, we tend to place more weight on information that confirms our trade position. Example- You think market is bullish & wanted to go on a long position,
Next a new bullish bar prints on the chart. You would think "Yes, my bullish proposition is still valid" (even though this bullish bar is smaller range)
A bearish bar prints. But you think "this bar lacks momentum" (because you already have firm belief that market is bullish)
One more bearish bar follows, pushing against a support level. But you would think "the support level is holding" Bullishness confirmed. Buy more! (even though this bar closed below the support level with clear momentum.)
During Trading hours, Your maximum time is spent on? Are you spending more time on analyzing your trades before placing the order or after placing the order?
— Kirubakaran Rajendran (@kirubaakaran) December 14, 2020
We do not like people or information that contradicts our thoughts. We like them when they confirm what we think. Hence, we tend to place more weight on information that confirms our trade position. Example- You think market is bullish & wanted to go on a long position,
Next a new bullish bar prints on the chart. You would think "Yes, my bullish proposition is still valid" (even though this bullish bar is smaller range)
A bearish bar prints. But you think "this bar lacks momentum" (because you already have firm belief that market is bullish)
One more bearish bar follows, pushing against a support level. But you would think "the support level is holding" Bullishness confirmed. Buy more! (even though this bar closed below the support level with clear momentum.)
I've been asked if I'm back involved in $UMDK given the apparent improvement in financials in the 1H PnL.
The short answer is NO. Of course this is not investment advice, DYODD, and I have no position in the stock either way but...
THREAD
I dumped this and moved on when the lack of disclosures + impossible to understand W/C moves made this simply a 'too hard' bucket for me. Post 1H, the qs remain...
I originally thought this biz was levered to rising adoption of Payback, through a licensing/low-touch take-rate type model. That apparently is not the case. Instead most of the growth is from the new 'consulting' segment - but there is no disclosure of what that entails...
...Nor is there disclosure of any clients; nor the revenue split b/w commerce/consulting and the legacy biz; nor any attempt at explanation for how the biz has suddenly exploded in growth...
...meanwhile of course receivables/payables improved HoH but keep in mind the AG (holdco/top level) entity still has essentially zero cash...and all the cash generated by the biz (apparently) sits in an (unaudited) sub...
I'm not casting aspersions but this is đ€đ€
The short answer is NO. Of course this is not investment advice, DYODD, and I have no position in the stock either way but...
THREAD
Small follow-up: NOT involved anymore as degree of difficulty just too high now. But noticed that 1H update that was previously labeled as '11/20' for release on $UMDK website is now 'Q4 2020' - ie probably slipping to Dec.
— Jeremy Raper (@puppyeh1) October 19, 2020
Why further delays? Are auditors pushing back? \U0001f9d0\U0001f9d0 https://t.co/jlaeNY6ypq
I dumped this and moved on when the lack of disclosures + impossible to understand W/C moves made this simply a 'too hard' bucket for me. Post 1H, the qs remain...
I originally thought this biz was levered to rising adoption of Payback, through a licensing/low-touch take-rate type model. That apparently is not the case. Instead most of the growth is from the new 'consulting' segment - but there is no disclosure of what that entails...
...Nor is there disclosure of any clients; nor the revenue split b/w commerce/consulting and the legacy biz; nor any attempt at explanation for how the biz has suddenly exploded in growth...
...meanwhile of course receivables/payables improved HoH but keep in mind the AG (holdco/top level) entity still has essentially zero cash...and all the cash generated by the biz (apparently) sits in an (unaudited) sub...
I'm not casting aspersions but this is đ€đ€