What are the concerns of young Russians? And how will they shape the future of their country & its relationship with Europe? The Levada Centre has done a fascinating study. Buckle up for a long thread. But be aware, it might shatter your Illusions.

First, young Russians are proud of their country and support the forceful restoration of Moscow's role in the international system under Putin. Around 69% agree with the statement “I am proud to be a citizen of Russia”. 2/X
Half of the respondents are sure that Russia’s prestige and international clout will keep growing and many lament that Moscow’s interests are not sufficiently emphasized on the international stage. 3/X
Young Russians are less religious than the overall population and the church is highly polarizing. At the same time, a vast majority considers itself to be Orthodox Christian. No signs of a demographic “Islamisation” of Russia. 4/X
To put it mildly: young Russians are not woke. Many do not want to live in the same neighborhood with Roma (75%), homosexual (61%), refugees (49%), Jews (27%), or people from the Caucasus (34%). 5/X
Young Russians trust Putin & the military more than democratic institutions like the Duma. The reasons for this can (probably) be related to the perceived role of the president and the army as guarantors of national security & dignity, seen apart from domestic policies. 6/X
The Kremlin’s idea of a sovereign or “controlled” democracy seems in line with the political ideology of young Russians. While many of them strongly support democracy and the need for political opposition, over 40% also fully support “a leader who rules with a strong hand". 7/X
Is Putin only popular because he controls state television? That’s at best part of the story. The digital shift is very evident among Russian youth. Over 80% get their information from the Internet, only 50% from television. 8/X
What's the ideology of young Russians? Social democratic ideas are most popular, followed by nationalism, liberalism, and communism. This does not differ greatly from the general population. But note that Russian nationalism is significantly more popular amongst the young. 9/X
What’s the view on Europe? Young Russians are estranged from Europe & the West. Many don’t identify with “Western” culture. Most see Europe & Russia in a state of confrontation. Only 52% believe that the relationship between Russia and the West can be truly friendly. 10/X
Young Russians blame (mostly) America for the conflict between Russia and Europe. Similar to the Russian government, they see NATO as a dividing force and Europe as a vassal of American interests. Note, that Putin gets hardly any blame for the escalating tensions. 11/X
Young Russians fully support their government in the Ukrainian conflict. And they are willing to pay the price for it. 67% would not support the return of Crimea if sanctions were lifted and 55% support providing support to the Donetsk & Lugansk enclaves in Eastern Ukraine. 12/X
So, what should we conclude from this? Two things: First, Putin is not going to be replaced by a Liberal. And second, the Kremlin’s foreign policy is primarily shaped by popular demand, not by Putin. Let me elaborate. 13/X
Putin might leave soon, or he might stay on for another decade. But whatever happens, he will not be replaced by a pro-Western Liberal like Navalny. The Russians don’t like these people. Navalny polls at 2%, behind the nationalists and communists. 14/X

https://t.co/fKziDKgTvY
Most Russians support conservative domestic policies, state intervention in the economy & a robust foreign policy. Thus Putin will be replaced by a chosen successor or a populist-nationalist who doubles down on standing up to the Oligarchs & NATO. Think of Orban or Duterte. 15/X
Ironically, the only way to replace Putin with someone like Navalny would be to ignore the will of the people. Only a Coup d'état engineered by parts of the elite, like the end of the Soviets, could boost a Navalny into the Kremlin. Elections will not. 16/X
Waiting until Putin is gone to negotiate with his successor will therefore not work. Russian foreign policy is fundamentally shaped by public opinion, not just by Putin’s worldview. Russians are willing to face Western sanctions and see NATO as the clear aggressor. 17/X
This leaves Europe with two options: 1) Following Clausewitz, we can use war to force our will upon the enemy. This seems stupid because we might lose, and even winning will probably get us killed. 2) As Macron and others have suggested, engaging in diplomacy. 18/X
Now diplomacy does not mean surrender. Europe clearly should not allow Russia to further carve up Ukraine or infringe on EU/NATO territory. Military deterrence, democracy promotion, and political unity are thereby crucial. 19/X
But accepting some of Moscow’s interests in its immediate neighborhood will be a necessary precondition for easing tensions. Russia is simply not going to accept further NATO expansion without a fight of some sort. (Read Mearsheimer on this.) 20/X

https://t.co/tppM81FizL
Additional sanctions will not change the Kremlin’s mind, since the Russian people are not deterred by them. Any additional economic pain will be seen as another form of Western aggression. This is clearly shown in the Levada study. 21/X
To conclude: Europe must decide if it wants to keep Moscow close. I think we should. We, therefore, need to consider the viewpoints of the Russian people, even if they diverge from ours.

More from World

1/10 With respect, multiple straw men here:
A) If you mean by "legally questionable" either that Senate is barred by constitution from trying an official impeached while in office, or that there are even very strong arguments against it, I have to differ...


2/10 Constitutional structure, precedent & any fair reading of original intent dictate that argument for jurisdiction is far stronger than argument against. On original intent, see

3/10 If you mean argument against jurisdiction is plausible, sure, it's plausible. It's just weak. In practical fact, Senate can try Trump now, find him guilty & disqualify him from future office if there are sufficient votes. And no court would presume to overturn that result

4/10 b) The argument from resources is awfully hard to take seriously. Fewer than a dozen House members act as Managers for a few weeks. They are staffed, as are Senators hearing case, by folks whose job it is to do stuff like this...

5/10 Yes, Senate floor time will be taken up. But it's past time for us to stop thinking of members of either house as feeble, fluttering, occupants of a nationally-funded convalescent home. There are nearly 500 of these people with 1000s of staff and a bunch of big buildings...

You May Also Like

1/12

RT-PCR corona (test) scam

Symptomatic people are tested for one and only one respiratory virus. This means that other acute respiratory infections are reclassified as


2/12

It is tested exquisitely with a hypersensitive non-specific RT-PCR test / Ct >35 (>30 is nonsense, >35 is madness), without considering Ct and clinical context. This means that more acute respiratory infections are reclassified as


3/12

The Drosten RT-PCR test is fabricated in a way that each country and laboratory perform it differently at too high Ct and that the high rate of false positives increases massively due to cross-reaction with other (corona) viruses in the "flu


4/12

Even asymptomatic, previously called healthy, people are tested (en masse) in this way, although there is no epidemiologically relevant asymptomatic transmission. This means that even healthy people are declared as COVID


5/12

Deaths within 28 days after a positive RT-PCR test from whatever cause are designated as deaths WITH COVID. This means that other causes of death are reclassified as