The managerial style and persona of Thomas Tuchel. 🇩🇪

[Thread]

Thomas Tuchel:

“My philosophy is an aesthetic one; aesthetic means to control the ball, the rhythm to attack in every minute, and to try and score as many goals as possible.”
If there is to be a defining and key element to Tuchel’s style and philosophy, it has to be his willingness and ability to shift and alter his setup - varying on matter of opposition that his side will face.

Essentially, he epitomises the post-modern manager.
Pep Guardiola is a prime example of a manager hell-bent on positional shifting and versatility in this side.

Thomas Tuchel takes this to even bigger heights. Engrossed on the desire to have multiple formations and systems, it’s almost as if he’s managing a video game.
The need for control is another part of the game that can be attributed to Tuchel’s style.

The core aims of Tuchel - a fusion of Klopp and Guardiola - include preventing the opposition from playing through the Gegenpress and attempting to dominate at any given time.
Within Tuchel’s teams, his main intentions are to never seek counter-attacks extensively and follow a low block.

Alternatively, he looks at the higher areas of the pitch, wins back possession, and zip the ball around with super technicality.
His objectivity to play his stylish and fashionable possession, requires the appropriate personnel.

The so-called “water carriers” required nimbleness of the game, specifically the likes of Herrera and Gueye at his previous club, PSG.
Midfielders with more modest and stylish aspects of their game, are vital to Tuchel’s possession-based approach.

At Borrusia Dortmund, he had fellow Germans, Julian Weigl and Ilkay Gündogan. At PSG, he had similar profiles, Marco Veratti and Leandro Paredes.
Tuchel despises the idea of players being robotic - too static and being too drilled.

He’s a firm believer in his player’s ability to solve problems, within pressure situations. It endorses the challenge to constantly stretch his players.
His innovation and attention to detail is strikingly crafty, especially during training sessions.

Players train on slippery surfaces, very narrow and very wide pitches - which are presented with brain teasers, such as stabilising the ball with their knees.
In most recent events, Tuchel’s Chelsea got a taste of his innovative methods.

Mini-sized footballs were implemented, to increase the player’s ball control. Additionally, rucking shields were also used, to improve his player’s physicality and strength.
Despite the accolades, despite the impressive resumé that he brings, Tuchel is yet to really carve out that dynasty that so many top managers crave.

He’s a perfectionist. He wants power. He has ambition, but his lack of alignment with the club’s hierarchy has been evident.
Nevertheless, Tuchel is aware of the Chelsea culture - regarding managers.

In his full unveiling to the Chelsea faithful, Tuchel said: “It is about winning. The DNA of the club is to win and go for trophies. I am here to challenge for every trophy.” Ambitious.
It’s such early days for Tuchel at Chelsea. However, in such short space of time, he’s really bought the fans to his side.

His transparency with his players is top-tier. Handles the media, extremely well - equipped with that confidence and enthusiasm to be here. It’s refreshing.
It’s now a matter of having the suitable platform and implementing his mark on the football club.

This comes with time, it comes with character and following such a devastating sacking of Frank Lampard, it needs the backing of the supporters. It’s crucial.
End of thread.

Thank you for reading. Really means a lot. I hope this thread was insightful and informative - and worth the read.

Likes and retweets are massively appreciated! Please leave some feedback and follow for more content like this!

More from World

1/10 With respect, multiple straw men here:
A) If you mean by "legally questionable" either that Senate is barred by constitution from trying an official impeached while in office, or that there are even very strong arguments against it, I have to differ...


2/10 Constitutional structure, precedent & any fair reading of original intent dictate that argument for jurisdiction is far stronger than argument against. On original intent, see

3/10 If you mean argument against jurisdiction is plausible, sure, it's plausible. It's just weak. In practical fact, Senate can try Trump now, find him guilty & disqualify him from future office if there are sufficient votes. And no court would presume to overturn that result

4/10 b) The argument from resources is awfully hard to take seriously. Fewer than a dozen House members act as Managers for a few weeks. They are staffed, as are Senators hearing case, by folks whose job it is to do stuff like this...

5/10 Yes, Senate floor time will be taken up. But it's past time for us to stop thinking of members of either house as feeble, fluttering, occupants of a nationally-funded convalescent home. There are nearly 500 of these people with 1000s of staff and a bunch of big buildings...

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Fake chats claiming to be from the Irish African community are being disseminated by the far right in order to suggest that violence is imminent from #BLM supporters. This is straight out of the QAnon and Proud Boys playbook. Spread the word. Protest safely. #georgenkencho


There is co-ordination across the far right in Ireland now to stir both left and right in the hopes of creating a race war. Think critically! Fascists see the tragic killing of #georgenkencho, the grief of his community and pending investigation as a flashpoint for action.


Across Telegram, Twitter and Facebook disinformation is being peddled on the back of these tragic events. From false photographs to the tactics ofwhite supremacy, the far right is clumsily trying to drive hate against minority groups and figureheads.


Declan Ganley’s Burkean group and the incel wing of National Party (Gearóid Murphy, Mick O’Keeffe & Co.) as well as all the usuals are concerted in their efforts to demonstrate their white supremacist cred. The quiet parts are today being said out loud.


The best thing you can do is challenge disinformation and report posts where engagement isn’t appropriate. Many of these are blatantly racist posts designed to drive recruitment to NP and other Nationalist groups. By all means protest but stay safe.