2 of 40
We're told these steps are necessary because Trump is supposedly a dangerous madman.
Yet it's plain as day that the madness of the last four years was caused not by Trump, but by our own national security apparatus, led by the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).
3 of 40
Only 10 days after Trump took office in 2017, FOREIGN POLICY magazine literally called for a "military coup" against him.
FP is owned by the Graham family, which used to own the Washington Post when Katharine Graham brought down Nixon.
https://t.co/eURdLfn8mk
4 of 40
FOREIGN AFFAIRS magazine echoed FOREIGN POLICY, urging "senior military leaders" to "resist orders" by Trump, and to consider removing him under the 25th Amendment.
https://t.co/9yAMhLZ2Qz
5 of 40
From the outset of Trump's presidency, FOREIGN AFFAIRS repeatedly accused him of mental instability, urging "military leaders" and "cabinet officers" to stand ready to oust him.
https://t.co/Z6BdVNZAy6
6 of 40
Coming from top foreign policy leaders, these incitements rattled the nation, establishing insurrection and coup d'etat as the "new normal" in US politics.
7 of 40
FOREIGN AFFAIRS is the official journal of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).
What is the CFR exactly?
And what's their beef with Trump?
https://t.co/YYcN2m7PW1
8 of 40
It boils down to MAGA vs. MABA.
Trump wants to Make America Great Again.
The CFR wants to Make America BRITISH Again.
It's that simple.
9 of 40
The CFR has been called the "real State Department," as it effectively controls US foreign policy.
Widely viewed as the nerve center of America's Deep State, the CFR also happens to be a front for British interests.
https://t.co/Zbm5r2LxdN
10 of 40
The CFR rose from the British Round Table Movement.
British statesman Cecil Rhodes (1853 - 1902) left a fortune to promote "British rule throughout the world" and "the ultimate recovery of the United States of America as an integral part of the British Empire..."
11 of 40
After Rhodes's death, Alfred Milner took over his movement.
Beginning in 1909, Milner set up secretive "Round Table" groups in English-speaking countries, to propagandize for a worldwide, English-speaking federation, in accordance with Rhodes's vision.
12 of 40
Full federation proved to be a hard sell.
Britain's English-speaking colonies wanted independence.
So the Round Tablers proposed a compromise.
They offered "Dominion" status or partial independence.
13 of 40
Canada was to be the model.
It had gained Dominion status in 1867.
This meant Canada governed itself internally, while Britain ran its foreign policy.
Canadians remained subjects of the Crown.
The same deal was now offered to other English-speaking colonies.
14 of 40
The Round Tablers had to work quickly.
War with Germany was expected.
Britain needed to mollify the Dominions with self-rule, so they'd agree to provide troops in the coming war.
Australia became a Dominion in 1901; New Zealand in 1907; and South Africa in 1910.
15 of 40
The United States presented a special challenge.
We had been independent since 1776.
Moreover, our relations with Britain had been stormy, marred by a bloody Revolution, the War of 1812, border disputes with Canada, and British meddling in our Civil War.
16 of 40
Beginning in the 1890s, the British waged a public relations blitz called "The Great Rapprochement," promoting Anglo-American unity.
https://t.co/qb39Y43IqQ
17 of 40
Scottish-born steel magnate Andrew Carnegie called openly for a "British-American Union," in 1893.
He expressly advocated America's return to the British Empire.
18 of 40
British journalist W.T. Stead argued in 1901 for an "English-speaking United States of the World."
https://t.co/TaRQfvOBOS
19 of 40
From the British standpoint, the Great Rapprochement was a flop.
When Britain declared war on Germany in 1914, troops poured in from every corner of the Empire.
But not from America.
The US sent troops only in April 1917, after 2 1/2 years of hard British lobbying.
20 of 40
To the British, the delay was intolerable.
It proved that Americans could not be trusted to make important decisions.
The Milner Group sought a "Canadian" solution — manipulating the US into a Dominion-like arrangement, with Britain controlling our foreign policy.
21 of 40
It had to be done quietly, through back channels.
During the 1919 Paris peace talks, Milner Group operatives worked with hand-picked US Anglophiles, many of them Round Table members, to devise formal mechanisms for coordinating US and British foreign policy.
22 of 40
On May 30, 1919, the Anglo-American Institute of International Affairs (AAIIA) was formed, with branches in NY and London.
However, anti-British feeling was rising in America.
Many blamed England for dragging us into war.
The NY branch separated from London in 1920.
23 of 40
Upon separation, the London branch was renamed the British Institute of International Affairs (BIIA).
In 1926, the BIIA received a royal charter, becoming the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA), commonly known as Chatham House.
https://t.co/fo9F7vRmCb
24 of 40
Meanwhile, the New York branch became the Council on Foreign Relations in 1921.
After separating from Chatham House, the CFR continued working closely with its British counterpart, under a strict code of secrecy called "Chatham House rules."
25 of 40
The CFR pushes two agendas:
1. Anglo-American unity
2. Globalism
These are the same goals set forth in Rhodes's will, which called for a global Anglo-American union so powerful it would "hereafter render wars impossible..."
https://t.co/Itns8LheRM
26 of 40
The CFR is undeniably a front for British interests.
But that doesn't explain its hatred for
@realDonaldTrump. What has Trump done to threaten British interests?
And why is the threat deemed so severe that the CFR would call for military mutiny?
27 of 40
I believe the answer can be found in the original writings of the Rhodes group.
In THE AMERICANIZATION OF THE WORLD (1901), W.T. Stead — Rhodes's close
collaborator — argued that Britain had only two choices.
Britain must MERGE with America or be REPLACED by her.
28 of 40
By the 1890s, British leaders already knew that policing their Empire had become too costly.
Granting self-rule to the Dominions saved some money, by making the Dominions responsible for their own defense.
But military spending was still too high.
29 of 40
In 1906, British banker Lord Avebury complained that the U.S. was getting rich at Britain's expense.
While the US profited from the Pax Britannica, Britain spent 60 percent more than America on its military, to keep the world safe for business.
https://t.co/NUzlJrx5WX
30 of 40
Today, the situation is reversed in Britain's favor.
Now America polices the world, while British investors get rich from the Pax Americana.
British military spending is now a fraction of ours.
Coincidence? Or planning?
31 of 40
British elites were not content with transferring the cost of empire to America.
They also wanted to retain control of imperial policy, thus having their cake and eating it too.
With the help of the CFR, they have come very close to attaining this goal.
32 of 40
The "New Imperialist" movement in Britain seeks to rebuild the UK's global influence, on the back of the US military.
British historian Andrew Roberts announced this new movement in a January 8, 2005 article in the Daily Mail.
https://t.co/ch6gEzXpvT
33 of 40
Calling for the "recolonisation of Africa," Roberts boasted that most African dictatorships would collapse at the "mere arrival on the horizon of an aircraft carrier from an English- speaking country..."
DOWNLOAD PDF
https://t.co/FDYs2iltVO
34 of 40
Roberts did not say WHICH "English-speaking country" would be expected to provide aircraft carriers for such adventures, but I'll give you three guesses.
35 of 40
More than a hundred years have passed since W.T. Stead warned that Britain must merge with America or be replaced by her.
Little has changed.
British elites still face the same choice.
They cannot accept an American-led world.
So they must find ways to control us.
36 of 40
15 years after announcing the "New Imperialism," Roberts and his fellow imperialists continue pushing for Cecil Rhodes's dream of an English-speaking union, this time in the form of the so-called CANZUK Treaty.
https://t.co/hnyBqeRky1
37 of 40
In his book A HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH-SPEAKING PEOPLES SINCE 1900, Roberts breezily suggests that America would be better off as a Commonwealth Realm.
If you don't know what a Commonwealth Realm is, see the thread below.
https://t.co/QYXYRo1keK
38 of 40
On pages 512-514, Roberts notes that, if America were a Dominion like Canada, we would have been spared the national trauma of Watergate.
The Queen would have simply stepped in and fired Nixon.
No need for any democratic process.
https://t.co/saWbtZTfqU
39 of 40
Trump has taught us that MAGA and MABA don't mix.
The instant we get a president who stands up for America, the British go loco.
It's clear we cannot be "great" and "British" at the same time.
We must choose one or the other.
https://t.co/8f9y1VCOMc
40 of 40
For further reading on the hidden history of the CFR, see these books by Prof. Carroll Quigley (1910-1977):
TRAGEDY AND HOPE (1966)
THE ANGLO-AMERICAN ESTABLISHMENT (1981)
See also Inderjeet Parmar's THINK TANKS AND POWER IN FOREIGN POLICY (2004).
