1. Military Intelligence continued:
. “Once the funds are clear and available to Paymasters and SKR / historical asset holders … all sellers will get NDAs (nondisclosure agreements) and THE PROCESS BEGINS [our guy added it BEGINS AT THE TIME THAT T4B 800# NOTIFICATIONS GO OUT,
. XXXXX
. “Chief of Redemption XXXX NYC“
. Our guy said Pelosi has been dealt with so that is why she “so graciously” [said with sarcasm and with dentures sliding around the mouth hidden by a mask. . .] said that NOW SHE WILL NO LONGER STAND IN THE WAY OF...
The Hill
Saagar Enjeti: Pelosi ADMITS She Held Up Stimulus Before Election T…
[10:32 PM]
. He said his info matches Dr. Charlie Ward who said he got a call last Thu 3 Dec that they were ready FINALLY to release the RV shotgun start—that is still the case this...
. He is also confirming parts of Tony’s info and sources that redemption center exchange staff today Mon 7 Dec were “at the banks [& redemption centers]. So the start of exchanges could be from tomorrow TUE 8 DEC. Treasury saying still before Christmas.
. He said keep praying this in,...
More from 🇺🇸I Support Our Military & Law Enforcement🇺🇸
More from Trading
You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".