Book II of #WealthOfNations! It's all about stock! Not the kind you fill with chicken and noodles, but the kind that (according to #AdamSmith) makes commercial society go 'round. (II.intro)
https://t.co/FlxQLGdjbW
#WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets

First! A quick review: without division of labor, every person must provide everything they need. No one accumulates or stores up stock. You do what you can with what you have when you have it. (II.intro.1) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
But once the division of labor develops (remember, it’s the secret sauce!) we have so many wants that we can’t provide for them all ourselves. Most of them are provided for by others, and we purchase their labor with our own. (II.intro.2) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
Here's why this all matters when we think about stock: we can’t purchase other people’s labor until we have completed (and been paid for) our own. So we need a stock of supplies to sustain us until we can finish our work and get paid. (II.intro.2) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
Obviously, we need that BEFORE we start working in this way. So to get the division of labor you need the accumulation of stock. It’s an ingredient of the secret sauce. (All the best sauces are made with stock!) (II.intro.3)
https://t.co/wi1HtrmBPb
#WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
Stock isn't just necessary to the division of labor, Smith says that it also inevitably leads to it. (II.intro.4) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
Why does the division of labor follow from the accumulation of stock? We want to use our stock as effectively as possible, and the division of labor is more effective, more efficient, and more wealth-increasing than solo production. (II.intro.4) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
Once you have enough stock hanging around to support you for a few months or years, you can stop worrying about just survival. But, says Smith, many of the laboring poor never get past this point. (II.i.2) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
But if you can get to this place of security, you start to think that maybe you could do something better with your saved up stock than just leave it hanging around. Something like...create wealth! (II.i.2) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
Suddenly, you think of your stock not just as a pile of stuff, but as two piles of stuff! One pile will support you immediately (Smith, of course, subdivides that pile up. Smith loves a good subdivision). (II.i.2) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
The other pile of stuff is capital, and it can make you wealthy! (II.i.2) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
You can use capital to make yourself wealthy in two ways.

1) Use it to raise, make, or buy stuff to sell to others.
2) Use it to improve land, or buy machinery and tools for your business.
(II.i.4–5) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
Merchants only need 1). Other occupations need both 1) and 2) in varying amounts. (II.i.6–10) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
(Smith clearly knows nothing about making clothes. Anyone who thinks that all you need is a package of needles isn’t paying attention. And didn’t he do a whole thing on pins back in Book One? Who does he think is using all those pins?!) (II.i.8) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
(And also...that whole section on the improvements in textiles?! Why are we, the SmithTweeters, more on top of this than Smith? Harrumph. It's probably because we read @vpostrel and follow @AmericanDuchess and @zackpinsent) (I.xi.o.5–12; II.i.8) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
Anyway. Moving on. The general stock of a country divides itself in much the same way as we divide our personal stock. (II.i.11) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
First, there’s the stock of stuff that we use but have not consumed (yet). This is stuff like clothing, houses, the SmithTweeters' drawerful of tea, etc. These don’t add to the national revenue. (II.i.12) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
Second, there’s fixed capital, which is stuff that adds to the national revenue without changing hands. This is stuff like machinery, land improvements, and education/skills. They make a nation wealthier, but don’t move wealth around. (II.i.13–17) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
Last, there is circulating capital. This only makes money for anyone when it is traded and exchanged. This is made up of money, perishable provisions, manufacturing materials, and finished work that has not yet been sold. (II.i.19–22) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
We regularly draw stuff from circulating capital to put it into fixed capital and stock to help sustain ourselves. Fixed capital needs circulating capital to refill its supplies, to pay the workers who run the machines, etc. (II.i.25) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
The ONLY reason we need fixed and circulating capital is to maintain and increase the stock of goods and provisions that supplies a nation’s people. The wealth of the people depends on how well capital is employed. (II.i.26) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
But we also refill circulating capital from stock. The stock provides goods that are worked up into finished work, which can then circulate and replenish the fixed capital. It all goes around and around! (II.i.27) https://t.co/S5CZ50XKS2
#WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
It HAS TO go around and around. Stock is always getting worn out and consumed, so we need to be producing even if all that we get out of it is wealth levels that stay the same. (II.i.27) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
The farmer replenishes the things the merchant used to make his goods, and the merchant replenishes the finished goods the farmer has used or worn out. (II.i.28) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
If you’re living in a stable, secure nation, you have to be “perfectly crazy” not to use your stock in these ways. (II.i.30) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
But not all societies are lucky. In some, people are continually threatened by violence, and then they bury or hide their stock in case they have to flee. It’s a sorry solution to a real problem. And it often leads to great loss of wealth. (II.i.31) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
Buried treasure is a pretty exciting (if more depressing than we'd have expected) note to go out on here. (II.i.31) But don't worry if you're feeling overheated. We'll back tomorrow to talk—at length—about money. 💰 #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets

More from @AdamSmithWorks

More from Trading

You May Also Like

1/“What would need to be true for you to….X”

Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?

A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:


2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to

- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal

3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:

Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.

Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.

4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?

To get clarity.

You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.

It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.

5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”

Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.
Rig Ved 1.36.7

To do a Namaskaar or bow before someone means that you are humble or without pride and ego. This means that we politely bow before you since you are better than me. Pranipaat(प्राणीपात) also means the same that we respect you without any vanity.

1/9


Surrendering False pride is Namaskaar. Even in devotion or bhakti we say the same thing. We want to convey to Ishwar that we have nothing to offer but we leave all our pride and offer you ourselves without any pride in our body. You destroy all our evil karma.

2/9

We bow before you so that you assimilate us and make us that capable. Destruction of our evils and surrender is Namaskaar. Therefore we pray same thing before and after any big rituals.

3/9

तं घे॑मि॒त्था न॑म॒स्विन॒ उप॑ स्व॒राज॑मासते ।
होत्रा॑भिर॒ग्निं मनु॑षः॒ समिं॑धते तिति॒र्वांसो॒ अति॒ स्रिधः॑॥

Translation :

नमस्विनः - To bow.

स्वराजम् - Self illuminating.

तम् - His.

घ ईम् - Yours.

इत्था - This way.

उप - Upaasana.

आसते - To do.

स्त्रिधः - For enemies.

4/9

अति तितिर्वांसः - To defeat fast.

मनुषः - Yajman.

होत्राभिः - In seven numbers.

अग्निम् - Agnidev.

समिन्धते - Illuminated on all sides.

Explanation : Yajmans bow(do Namaskaar) before self illuminating Agnidev by making the offerings of Havi.

5/9